Search

Trump - Peskov stated - said he believes the moment has come for a new president. Why? Because the Ukrainian president must make very important and very difficult decisions to stop this war. Either Zelensky takes on this responsibility and shows the political will, or he does not. #SanzioniUE #GuerraInUcraina #SicurezzaEnergetica (translated)

Sabrina F. wrote that defending fundamental rights should not be defined as racism and distinguished her critique of a model of society from hostility towards a religion. She argued that in that model, the law would be subordinate to a sacred text, that changing faith or loving a person of the same sex could lead to severe penalties, and that in 2026, in ten states, the death penalty could be at risk for the latter reason. She also cited marriages with girls aged 9 and restrictions imposed on women, including beatings by moral police for the veil. According to Sabrina F., the separation between religion and law and equality before the law were principles enshrined in the Constitution. She criticized what she described as a selective silence on the rights of LGBTQ+ people and women: she wrote that in half of the planet, rainbow flags could lead to life imprisonment or the death penalty and recalled the case of a twenty-year-old beaten by the moral police for the veil. She added that in too many countries opening a church could lead to prison and argued that accepting laws applied differently in the same society was neither inclusion nor openness. #DirittiUmani #LibertàDiCredo #GiustiziaSociale (translated)

Trump – Peskov stated – said he believes it is time for a new president. Why? Because the Ukrainian president must make very important and very difficult decisions to stop this war. Either Zelensky takes on this responsibility and demonstrates political will, or not. #Ucraina #Trump #Zelensky (translated)

Trump - Peskov stated - said he believes it is time for a new president. Why? Because the Ukrainian president has to make very important and very difficult decisions to stop this war. Either Zelensky takes on this responsibility and shows political will, or he does not. This was said to the Ria Novosti agency by the Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry Peskov. #Zelensky #Trump #Ucraina (translated)

Luigi Marattin responded to Corrado Formigli, who in the Corriere had described as "an embarrassing confusion" what the deputy said on Piazzapulita. Marattin mentioned that he has been reading investigative journalism and historical studies on conflicts for decades and cited Il Legionario, a book about Giustino De Vuono, arguing that its author documented the presented theses. Marattin accused the documentary Naza of making unfounded accusations. He cited the bombing which, according to the mentioned reconstruction, would have killed 500 civilians, stating that no evidence of either the attack or the death toll had been presented. He argued that the only source was Hamas's word, treated as truth, while Israeli accounts were dismissed as propaganda. He added that he had said on air that, in wartime, he did not consider the reports of the involved parties reliable and preferred those from independent observers. For this reason, he described Israel's decision not to allow foreign journalists into Gaza, even at their own risk, as a mistake. Marattin accused Formigli of not listening to this point and of silencing dissenters, imposing his own opinion. Finally, he wrote that he would have liked to read a "mea culpa" from the host for his statements about Israeli children on October 7. #giornalismodinchiesta #storia #media (translated)

The author wrote that a company that believed it compromised the professional integrity of one of its leading journalists should have removed him, rather than offering him important assignments like those given to Sigfrido Ranucci. https://t.co/enpmiqeEoq #giornalismo #integrità #notizie #IT (translated)

SandroSca said he did not believe that the agreement between Gravina and Marotta for Malagò, with Viglione as the general secretary, could be realized. He wondered how it was possible after, in his opinion, it had emerged that Viglione had pressured Rocchi and had not monitored Malagò's requirements. He also questioned media reports that Percassi wanted Malagò. https://t.co/7ztq1i6bSL #Calcio #Sport #PoliticaSportiva (translated)

Paola had described Gianmarco as optimistic for believing that the program was followed all over the world: in her opinion, it was watched by Twitter users passionate about reality shows and some general viewers who fell asleep in front of the Wheel without changing the channel. https://t.co/s5CXwHFU7J #ottimismo #reality #televisione (translated)

BICCY.IT recalled that, in the early days, Piera had responded to Varsi's compliments by saying she was in a relationship and loved him. According to the site, after Roncaccia's arrival, she had expressed doubts about the relationship and said that things were not going well. BICCY.IT therefore questioned whether Roncaccia was not the cause of the breakup. #GFVip #GFVip #realityshow #amore (translated)

Marmitta wrote that the gym was crowded with people training for Hyrox and expressed disbelief, using an offensive expression referring to people with disabilities. He criticized those who, in his opinion, followed trends without thinking and added that he would have died smiling if a bomb had fallen on the gym at that moment. #inclusione #sport #hyrox (translated)

I would have been really happy if Ljubicic had taken Cahill's place. On paper, he was (is, always will be) the perfect fit. In terms of mentality, rationality, and the way he reads tennis, he has always spoken a language very similar to that of Sinner. But this was precisely what did not persuade me completely. In my mind, therefore it counts for zero, I would like a gram of chaos within the order, to explore all the margin that Jannik still has. In my opinion, it is bigger than one might think. Good luck to Felix, he made a great move! #tennis #sinner #faa #tennis #sinner #sport (translated)

Do you want me to believe that Malagò did not have the requirements for the FIGC presidency and that the office that validated the compliance is that of Viglione, who had an agreement with Marotta & Malagò to become General Secretary? The same Viglione who pressured Rocchi? I will NEVER believe it! https://t.co/ynPTJQKymK #FIGC #Malagò #calcio (translated)

No. There is nothing to discuss. There is nothing to ascertain. If there are two opposing scientific results, particularly one positive and two negative, that element cannot be used as evidence against the suspect or the accused. This is due to the principle that a conviction must be issued beyond a reasonable doubt, for the presumption of innocence, for the "favor rei." Because we live in a rule of law state. The DNA of Chiara Poggi on the pedals of Alberto Stasi's bicycle was one of the seven pieces of evidence that led to his conviction. Judicially and humanly. In the ruling of the Court of Appeal in 2014, it is clearly stated that according to the RIS interviewed during the first-degree trial in 2009, that DNA was significant, highly cellular, and compatible with blood substance. In fact, it was so significant that white blood cells could be seen with the naked eye. And that the tests conducted in 2009 yielded negative results regarding the blood presumably because two years had passed. All this was reported. But they forgot to mention that the day after the positive result, two additional tests (which were incomprehensible given the clear result of the first test) had yielded negative results. And when the experts appointed by the first-degree judge asked for all the laboratory results related to the pedals, they only provided the positive one. I want to believe that I live in a place where those who hold great responsibilities take on the consequences of their actions or omissions. I am not interested if, according to the law, the consequences will not be criminal because they have become statute-barred in their illegality. I care that those responsibilities be clarified and made known to everyone. To everyone. And I am sure that will happen. #garlasco #garlasco #giustizia #presunzioneDiInnocenza #diritto (translated)

Una volta, quando ero bambino, mio ​​padre mi disse: "Se non segui la religione della nostra famiglia – quella che i nostri antenati hanno seguito per migliaia di anni – non avrai il mio amore". Io risposi: "Se c'è una condizione, allora tu ami i tuoi antenati, ami la tua religione, ami i tuoi ideali e la tua morale... ma non ami me. Se l'amore non è incondizionato non è amore, e se non è incondizionato, io non lo accetterò. Non credere che solo tu abbia la capacità di amarmi; anch'io ne faccio parte. Posso rifiutarlo. Se dovessi scorgere anche solo un minimo condizionamento celato dietro di esso, sarei l'ultima persona ad accettarlo. Posso vivere senza il tuo amore, ma non posso accettare un amore che comporti una condizione. Non è affatto amore". Deve averci riflettuto tutto il giorno. La sera, mentre stavo per andare a dormire, venne da me e disse: "Mi dispiace. Capisco ciò che hai detto. Forse, in nome dell'amore, stavo solo cercando di imporgli i miei ideali". E come può l'amore imporre ideali a qualcuno? L'amore ti accetta semplicemente per quello che sei; non c'è bisogno di essere qualcun altro. Osho ❤💞❤