Search

Jeje questioned Nunes Marques if he would also administratively suspend Flávio Bolsonaro's channel for spreading false news. He said he wanted to file a civil petition with the minister and classified the far-right and bolsonarism as pathetic. #Bolsonaro #ExtremaDireita #NotíciaFalsa (translated)

The merchants of the Gaia Handicraft Market are facing the threat of unemployment due to the market's closure until December to make way for luxury hotels, which has generated a petition with more than 500 signatures in defense of the continuation of artisanal activity in the area. #VilaNovaDeGaia #MercadoDeArtesanato #Desemprego (translated)

The journalist stated that Flávio Bolsonaro's campaign had asked the Electoral Court for the suspension of 32 Instagram pages until after the second round, the removal of 221 posts, and restrictions on other profiles, including media outlets and parliamentarians. According to the author, another 16 profiles were mentioned in requests for removal, content restriction, or monitoring, without a request for complete suspension. Among the profiles he recommended to follow and support, the journalist mentioned Mídia Ninja, Pragmatismo, Thiago Resiste, Leonel Radde, Gleisi Hoffmann, CUT Brasil, PT na Câmara, Maria do Rosário, Pimenta, Rogério Correia, and Duda Salabert. He also cited, among the accounts targeted by other measures, Brasil com Lula, PT-RJ, Pedro Uczai, PT Boa Viagem, and Ana Paula Lima. The author criticized the requests and stated that the petition included profiles without posts classified as false in the table presented by the lawyers. He also said that the requests were awaiting a judicial decision and that, in that action, there was no order to suspend accounts on X. The publication indicated the TSE as the source, in the process AIJE 0602742-32.2026.6.00.0000. #LiberdadeDeExpressão #Censura #Eleições2023 (translated)

Allan Dos Santos related Minister Fux's decision to investigate Alexandre de Moraes’s actions to his own judicial experience in 2021. According to him, the magazine IstoÉ was ordered to pay moral damages and to grant a right of response for reports that accused him, along with Terça Livre, of receiving public money from Carlos Bolsonaro during the Bolsonaro government. Dos Santos stated that the cases were proceeding in the common court of Brasília, but that after the conviction, a law firm linked, according to him, to corruption scandals of the PT appealed directly to Moraes's office. The lawyer submitted Pet 9748, which, by the minister's determination, was converted into constitutional complaint Rcl 48870. According to Dos Santos, Moraes annulled the convictions in both cases. He added that the PGR expressed that the complaint was unfounded, seeing no legal basis to annul the convictions, and that Moraes denied his lawyers' appeals, preventing the court from reviewing the case. Dos Santos also said that petitions questioning the validity of the complaint were ignored and argued that deputies and senators should take the case to Fux. #Justiça #DireitosHumanos #Corrupção (translated)

Danteskoo stated that Vasco submitted a petition to Judge Adriana Franco in the afternoon, asking her to reconsider her decision after the 5th Chamber of Public Law dismissed, according to him, objections related to the connection and prevention with a Popular Action filed by a fan. According to the author, the club requested the immediate continuation of the process and the analysis of the request for urgent protection to play at Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20. #Vasco #Maracanã #BocaJuniors (translated)

The Football Planet reported that 17 clubs were accompanying Flamengo in a lawsuit in the Supreme Court against the end of betting: Fluminense, Botafogo, América-MG, Athletic Club, Atlético-GO, Avaí, Botafogo-SP, Ceará, Chapecoense, CRB, Criciúma, Cruzeiro, Goiás, Juventude, Mirassol, Novorizontino, and Vila Nova. According to the publication, Vasco, Palmeiras, Corinthians, Santos, and Internacional did not join the group. São Paulo, Ponte Preta, Vitória, Guarani, and Portuguesa SAF had submitted a petition to Minister Luiz Fux the day before. The publication cited O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas. #Flamengo #Futebol #STF (translated)

DataFut reported that Flamengo, Fluminense, Botafogo, Cruzeiro, Mirassol, América, Athletic, Atlético Goianiense, Avaí, Botafogo-SP, Ceará, Chapecoense, CRB, Criciúma, Goiás, Juventude, Novorizontino, and Vila Nova had appealed to the STF against the MP of BETS, according to O Globo. It also stated that São Paulo, Ponte Preta, Vitória, Guarani, and Portuguesa had submitted a petition to Luiz Fux on Thursday and that Vasco, Palmeiras, Corinthians, Santos, and Inter differed from the clubs in Serie A. #Futebol #STF #MPdasBETS (translated)

🚨 VASCO CONTESTS TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF FLA-FLU, POINTS OUT VIOLATION OF CONCESSION RULES AND CITES DECISION FROM TJRJ IN ACTION FOR MARACANÃ Vasco filed an obligation lawsuit on Wednesday (1st) with a request for urgent protective measures to try to secure the Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. In the action, the club directly questions the technical criteria used by Fla-Flu to deny the stadium, points out unequal treatment, supports violations of concession rules, and also explores a contradiction involving the Memorandum of Understanding. 📌 WHAT FLA-FLU ALLEGED In response to Vasco, the concessionaire pointed to the accumulated wear of the lawn, the climatic conditions of July and August, and the need to preserve the intervals designated for field maintenance. For 10/20, Fla-Flu specifically mentioned games of Fluminense on 10/18 and Flamengo on 10/22. With Vasco x Boca between these matches, there would be three games in five days. According to the concessionaire, this sequence would prevent procedures such as helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and repair of damage to the lawn. 📌 VASCO QUESTIONS THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION The first counterpoint is the lawn itself. Vasco highlights that, three days after the denial, it was announced that the existing field would be removed and new Bermuda Celebration rolls would be placed, with the return of football scheduled for 10/08. Vasco x Boca will be on 10/20. The club's thesis is that it would not be possible to use the accumulated wear of the old lawn as justification for a match that will take place 12 days after the return of football to the renewed field. 📌 GREENLEAF DOCUMENT IS USED BY VASCO Vasco also retrieves the technical planning prepared by Greenleaf, the company responsible for lawn maintenance, in August. According to the action, the document shows that the same procedures cited by Fla-Flu to deny Vasco x Boca have already been carried out in a concentrated manner between matches. The petition states that helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and damage repair have even been grouped in a single day after a match, even in a winter scenario and lawn wear. The question posed by Vasco is direct: if this work could be done in August to accommodate the sequence of games from Flamengo and Fluminense, why couldn't it be repeated in October, after the complete lawn replacement? 📌 INTERVAL BETWEEN GAMES Vasco also contests the argument of three games in five days by comparing the situation with the recent calendar of the Maracanã. The action argues that sequences with reduced intervals for Flamengo and Fluminense matches have already been admitted. For Vasco, if the necessary interval for lawn recovery is decisive for denying a match, that criterion must be applied equally to all clubs. 📌 SHOWS AND OTHER EVENTS The action also points out that the Maracanã hosts shows, religious gatherings, and events from other sports, including the installation of structures and occupancy of the field area. Vasco questions how the administration can reconcile these events with lawn preservation, yet considers it technically unfeasible to host a semifinal of CONMEBOL. According to the data presented in the action, at least seven extraordinary events unrelated to official football were held between 2025 and 09/30/2026. 📌 CONCESSION NOTICE Vasco cites item 3.4 of the Terms of Reference, which gives priority to football events from the official calendars of FIFA, CONMEBOL, CBF, and FERJ over other events. Vasco x Boca is an official semifinal of CONMEBOL. The action argues that there would be an "inversion of this priority" by accommodating shows and other events and denying the stadium for a match that, under the concession rules cited by the club, should have priority. The petition mentions "distortion of the concessionaire's obligations" and "violation of the equal treatment required by the Concession Notice." 📌 UNEQUAL TREATMENT Vasco summarizes its challenge in four points: • the lawn replacement would change the premise of accumulated wear; • Greenleaf's own planning would demonstrate that maintenance could be carried out between matches; • the calendar would show reduced intervals that have already been admitted for Flamengo and Fluminense; • other events are reconciled with the necessary care for field preservation. As a result, Vasco asserts that restrictions are being applied selectively. The action further cites clause 13.2 of the Concession Contract, which prohibits favoritism and unjustifiably different, discriminatory treatment, or "without technical criteria" that results in restricted access to the Complex. 📌 THE CONTRADICTION POINTED OUT BY VASCO Fla-Flu claims not to recognize the validity of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025. At the same time, according to Vasco, it uses the document itself—especially the provision for four matches conditioned on availability and operational conditions—to justify the denial. Vasco points out contradictory behavior and invokes the principle of good faith. 📌 PREVIOUS DECISION OF TJRJ The action also cites the Instrument Appeal No. 3023517-70.2026.8.19.0000. On that occasion, Justice Alexandre Freitas Câmara analyzed the discussion regarding the absence of Fla-Flu's signature on the Memorandum. The magistrate stated that Flamengo and Fluminense, members of the concessionaire, had signed the document and pointed out that disregarding it later could represent contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. 📌 RECOMMENDATION FROM BEPE The issue of public safety also appears as an argument for the use of the Maracanã. According to the action, BEPE (Specialized Battalion for Policing in Stadiums) recommended holding the match at the Maracanã due to the magnitude of the confrontation and the expected public turnout. Vasco uses this recommendation to argue that the Maracanã is not just a preference of the club. The petition points to the stadium as the option that best meets capacity, location, structure, security, and operational conditions to host the match against Boca. 📌 SÃO JANUÁRIO IS NOT AN OPTION Vasco also differentiates the situation from the previous process involving Vasco x Vitória, when it did not obtain a preliminary injunction to use the Maracanã. This time, according to the action, São Januário cannot host the semifinal. The South American Manual requires a minimum capacity of 30,000 spectators starting from the semifinals, while the petition indicates São Januário has approximately 21,880 seats. Vasco acknowledges the Nilton Santos Stadium as an alternative but argues that having another stadium does not resolve the issue brought to Justice: is there legitimate technical and contractual basis for Fla-Flu to deny Maracanã? 📌 WHAT VASCO SEEKS Vasco is seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Fla-Flu to make the Maracanã available for Vasco x Boca on 10/20 at 9:30 PM. The request includes the maximum ticket allocation corresponding to the authorized capacity, the use of necessary facilities for organizing the match, the implementation of a mosaic, and temporary installation of banners in the same manner allowed for the clubs that are members of the concessionaire. In case of non-compliance, Vasco requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million. Vasco must inform CONMEBOL by October 5 where it will hold the return match of the semifinal. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

URGENT: VASCO GOES TO COURT OVER MARACANÃ! Vasco da Gama filed a lawsuit on Thursday (1st) for an obligation to act with a request for urgent protection against FLA-FLU Serviços S.A., the concessionaire of Maracanã. The objective is to guarantee the match Vasco x Boca Juniors, for the CONMEBOL Sudamericana semifinal, at Maracanã, on October 20, at 9:30 PM. The urgency is huge: Vasco needs to inform CONMEBOL by October 5 which stadium will host the match. In the action, the club argues that São Januário does not meet the minimum capacity requirement established for the semifinals of the competition and emphasizes the structure of Maracanã to host a confrontation of this magnitude. The petition also cites a statement from the Military Police in favor of holding the game at the stadium. Vasco also claims to have a Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025 that provided for the use of Maracanã in matches of CBF, FIFA, or CONMEBOL competitions, in addition to establishing that any refusal should be based on technical and operational criteria. The preliminary request is clear: for the court to order the availability of Maracanã for Vasco x Boca Juniors, including the necessary conditions for the execution and organization of the match. The club also requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance with the possible court order and urgently requires the concessionaire to be notified so that the stadium can be confirmed with CONMEBOL within the deadline. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

NOW: Kim Kataguiri, lawyer for Renan Santos, asks the STF to FORCE Globo to include the candidate in the debate and accuses the network of possible “MANIPULATION OF THE ELECTION.” In the action, the defense argues that the exclusion of Renan, while another candidate with lower performance in the polls was invited, represents arbitrary treatment. The request seeks a preliminary decision determining Renan's participation in Globo's presidential debate this Thursday (1st) at 9:30 PM, on equal conditions with the other candidates. The petition, signed by deputy and lawyer Kim Kataguiri, even states that Renan's absence has the “intention of manipulating the election.” The accusation is a defense argument and will still be analyzed by the STF. #DebatePresidencial #STF #Manipulação (translated)

🚨 NOW! Flamengo anticipates the clubs and files a request with the STF against the Provisional Measure that prohibited the bets. The Red-Black club requested today to Minister Luiz Fux to participate in the action that questions the MP. The club also wants its statement to be considered in the analysis of the request for suspension of the MP. In the petition, Fla states that the prohibition affects the FINANCING OF SPORTS. The club cites its master sponsorship of R$ 268.5 million per year, valid until the end of 2028. Flamengo considers the 10 days for the exit of the betting companies insufficient and warns about the effects of the sudden loss of revenue in football, in Olympic sports, in women's football, and in the youth categories. President Bap has criticized the MP since its signing. Other clubs are also organizing to act TOGETHER. The movement follows the initiative of the National Syndicate of Professional Football Associations (Sinafut) in the action of the National Association of Games and Lotteries (ANJL) and the Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR). In addition to the suspension of the MP, the union requests a 6-MONTH transition. The mobilization against the MP brings together bets, clubs, federations, and the CBF. #Flamengo #Apostas #Futebol (translated)

Petição pede reabertura das rachadinhas de Flávio Bolsonaro após reportagem do ICL Representação usa revelação sobre cofre mantido pelo senador para sustentar existência de provas novas e pede quebra de sigilo e depoimento de Flávio LEIA 👇️ https://t.co/fKgp7OpnUx #FlávioBolsonaro #Política #Justiça

Fux expõe o ministro Dino, que tem atuado como militante lulista na corte. Fux demonstra como Dino usurpou não apenas a competência do TSE, mas de todos os ministros do Supremo, utilizando um processo que não tinha nada a ver com o tema em discussão para decidir sobre o caso e ainda expressamente afirmar que "outros pedidos de extensão podem ser deduzidos mediante petição nesses autos". "Não é exagero dizer que a decisão usurpa a competência dos demais ministros", afirmou Fux. #Justiça #Supremo #Política

⚠️ URGENTE Após análise detida da brilhante decisão do Ministro Flávio Dino, nossa interpretação é de que TODAS as publicações censuradas foram liberadas. O ministro determinou que as plataformas digitais sejam notificadas "para restabelecimento da postagem objeto da petição e das demais que tenham sido excluídas pelo mesmo fundamento" #LiberdadeDeExpressão #Censura #DireitosHumanos

Vou postar aqui o meu trecho preferido da petição que nós apresentamos em defesa do Antonio Tabet e da liberdade de expressão de todos nós: "O Representante [Flávio Bolsonaro] pretende resolver essa ausência [de menção a seu nome] afirmando que o contexto tornaria evidente a identidade do destinatário. Ocorre que a identificação contextual continua a depender de elementos externos ao enunciado; e o fato de o Representante ter se reconhecido na descrição é revelador, mas não transforma a frase em referência nominal. Ironicamente, foi o próprio Representante quem se apresentou em juízo para sustentar que a expressão "família miliciana" somente poderia designá-lo e aos seus. A espontaneidade dessa identificação pode ser politicamente eloquente; processualmente, porém, não substitui o ônus de demonstrar que a postagem efetivamente o identificava de forma objetiva. A tutela de urgência serve para proteger o candidato objetivamente atingido, mas não transforma toda autopercepção em nexo jurídico apto a justificar censura prévia de perfil de terceiro." #LiberdadeDeExpressão #DireitosHumanos #Justiça