Search

The Wizard of the White Boots wrote that he had missed Betis in recent days and celebrated that the team had made the best start in its history in the First Division. He also encouraged enjoying the team and expressed that he wanted more. https://t.co/7l5JEed4WM #Betis #LaLiga #Fútbol (translated)

DAZN Spain noted that Marc Márquez positively evaluated his weekend in Mandalika and said that on Thursday he would have accepted finishing with no difference compared to Martín and three points fewer than Bezzecchi. https://t.co/WiTJKAnzAq #MotoGP #IndonesianGP #MarcMárquez (translated)

Donald Trump has signed a diesel supply agreement with Vladimir Putin that could facilitate the financing of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and provoke criticism from Ukrainian leaders, while the United States temporarily authorizes the operation with Russian diesel until April 2027. #GuerraEnUcrania #Trump #Putin (translated)

"Today we signed a loan agreement of 1 billion euros with Spain under the framework of the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) for the rapid scaling up of Spanish defense capabilities and preparedness," Kubilius informed in a social media post. #Defensa #UniónEuropea #SAFE (translated)

Tronk introduced Romina Uhrig as "cornered" at DDM and stated that her disability certificate was signed by three professionals appointed by Walter Festa, according to what was published in the Official Bulletin of the province of Buenos Aires. #RominaUhrig #Discapacidad #PolíticaArgentina (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Vasco filed an appeal on Friday (02) at the TJRJ against the decision of the 2nd Civil Court that did not analyze its urgent request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors and suspended the process for 20 days, after a statement from Fla-Flu Serviços in 48 hours. According to Tutinha, Vasco argued that it needs to indicate the stadium to CONMEBOL by 10/05 for the match on 10/20 at 21:30, and that the suspension could make a subsequent decision pointless. The club requested that Judge Rose Marie Pimentel Martins, from the 5th Chamber of Public Law, grant the request directly for Maracanã to be made available. As an alternative, it requested the end of the suspension and that the first-instance judge analyze the preliminary injunction without waiting for the appeal related to the popular action. Tutinha reported that Vasco also contested the technical criteria used to deny the stadium and claimed a contradiction in the concessionaire's position on the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Vasco, Flamengo, and Fluminense. The club stated that the restrictions should be applied in a non-discriminatory manner and cited ten official matches held at Maracanã in May 2026, nine of them between the 9th and 30th, including games on consecutive days: Fluminense x Bolívar on 05/19, and Flamengo x Estudiantes on 05/20; Flamengo x Cusco on 05/26, and Fluminense x Deportivo La Guaira on 05/27. According to Tutinha, Vasco also mentioned the indication of Maracanã by PMERJ as the most suitable option for security planning. Among the requests, it included non-discriminatory commercial and operational conditions, a maximum ticket load according to the authorized capacity, and a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

🚨 VASCO CONTESTS TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF FLA-FLU, POINTS OUT VIOLATION OF CONCESSION RULES AND CITES DECISION FROM TJRJ IN ACTION FOR MARACANÃ Vasco filed an obligation lawsuit on Wednesday (1st) with a request for urgent protective measures to try to secure the Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. In the action, the club directly questions the technical criteria used by Fla-Flu to deny the stadium, points out unequal treatment, supports violations of concession rules, and also explores a contradiction involving the Memorandum of Understanding. 📌 WHAT FLA-FLU ALLEGED In response to Vasco, the concessionaire pointed to the accumulated wear of the lawn, the climatic conditions of July and August, and the need to preserve the intervals designated for field maintenance. For 10/20, Fla-Flu specifically mentioned games of Fluminense on 10/18 and Flamengo on 10/22. With Vasco x Boca between these matches, there would be three games in five days. According to the concessionaire, this sequence would prevent procedures such as helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and repair of damage to the lawn. 📌 VASCO QUESTIONS THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION The first counterpoint is the lawn itself. Vasco highlights that, three days after the denial, it was announced that the existing field would be removed and new Bermuda Celebration rolls would be placed, with the return of football scheduled for 10/08. Vasco x Boca will be on 10/20. The club's thesis is that it would not be possible to use the accumulated wear of the old lawn as justification for a match that will take place 12 days after the return of football to the renewed field. 📌 GREENLEAF DOCUMENT IS USED BY VASCO Vasco also retrieves the technical planning prepared by Greenleaf, the company responsible for lawn maintenance, in August. According to the action, the document shows that the same procedures cited by Fla-Flu to deny Vasco x Boca have already been carried out in a concentrated manner between matches. The petition states that helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and damage repair have even been grouped in a single day after a match, even in a winter scenario and lawn wear. The question posed by Vasco is direct: if this work could be done in August to accommodate the sequence of games from Flamengo and Fluminense, why couldn't it be repeated in October, after the complete lawn replacement? 📌 INTERVAL BETWEEN GAMES Vasco also contests the argument of three games in five days by comparing the situation with the recent calendar of the Maracanã. The action argues that sequences with reduced intervals for Flamengo and Fluminense matches have already been admitted. For Vasco, if the necessary interval for lawn recovery is decisive for denying a match, that criterion must be applied equally to all clubs. 📌 SHOWS AND OTHER EVENTS The action also points out that the Maracanã hosts shows, religious gatherings, and events from other sports, including the installation of structures and occupancy of the field area. Vasco questions how the administration can reconcile these events with lawn preservation, yet considers it technically unfeasible to host a semifinal of CONMEBOL. According to the data presented in the action, at least seven extraordinary events unrelated to official football were held between 2025 and 09/30/2026. 📌 CONCESSION NOTICE Vasco cites item 3.4 of the Terms of Reference, which gives priority to football events from the official calendars of FIFA, CONMEBOL, CBF, and FERJ over other events. Vasco x Boca is an official semifinal of CONMEBOL. The action argues that there would be an "inversion of this priority" by accommodating shows and other events and denying the stadium for a match that, under the concession rules cited by the club, should have priority. The petition mentions "distortion of the concessionaire's obligations" and "violation of the equal treatment required by the Concession Notice." 📌 UNEQUAL TREATMENT Vasco summarizes its challenge in four points: • the lawn replacement would change the premise of accumulated wear; • Greenleaf's own planning would demonstrate that maintenance could be carried out between matches; • the calendar would show reduced intervals that have already been admitted for Flamengo and Fluminense; • other events are reconciled with the necessary care for field preservation. As a result, Vasco asserts that restrictions are being applied selectively. The action further cites clause 13.2 of the Concession Contract, which prohibits favoritism and unjustifiably different, discriminatory treatment, or "without technical criteria" that results in restricted access to the Complex. 📌 THE CONTRADICTION POINTED OUT BY VASCO Fla-Flu claims not to recognize the validity of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025. At the same time, according to Vasco, it uses the document itself—especially the provision for four matches conditioned on availability and operational conditions—to justify the denial. Vasco points out contradictory behavior and invokes the principle of good faith. 📌 PREVIOUS DECISION OF TJRJ The action also cites the Instrument Appeal No. 3023517-70.2026.8.19.0000. On that occasion, Justice Alexandre Freitas Câmara analyzed the discussion regarding the absence of Fla-Flu's signature on the Memorandum. The magistrate stated that Flamengo and Fluminense, members of the concessionaire, had signed the document and pointed out that disregarding it later could represent contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. 📌 RECOMMENDATION FROM BEPE The issue of public safety also appears as an argument for the use of the Maracanã. According to the action, BEPE (Specialized Battalion for Policing in Stadiums) recommended holding the match at the Maracanã due to the magnitude of the confrontation and the expected public turnout. Vasco uses this recommendation to argue that the Maracanã is not just a preference of the club. The petition points to the stadium as the option that best meets capacity, location, structure, security, and operational conditions to host the match against Boca. 📌 SÃO JANUÁRIO IS NOT AN OPTION Vasco also differentiates the situation from the previous process involving Vasco x Vitória, when it did not obtain a preliminary injunction to use the Maracanã. This time, according to the action, São Januário cannot host the semifinal. The South American Manual requires a minimum capacity of 30,000 spectators starting from the semifinals, while the petition indicates São Januário has approximately 21,880 seats. Vasco acknowledges the Nilton Santos Stadium as an alternative but argues that having another stadium does not resolve the issue brought to Justice: is there legitimate technical and contractual basis for Fla-Flu to deny Maracanã? 📌 WHAT VASCO SEEKS Vasco is seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Fla-Flu to make the Maracanã available for Vasco x Boca on 10/20 at 9:30 PM. The request includes the maximum ticket allocation corresponding to the authorized capacity, the use of necessary facilities for organizing the match, the implementation of a mosaic, and temporary installation of banners in the same manner allowed for the clubs that are members of the concessionaire. In case of non-compliance, Vasco requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million. Vasco must inform CONMEBOL by October 5 where it will hold the return match of the semifinal. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

URGENT: VASCO GOES TO COURT OVER MARACANÃ! Vasco da Gama filed a lawsuit on Thursday (1st) for an obligation to act with a request for urgent protection against FLA-FLU Serviços S.A., the concessionaire of Maracanã. The objective is to guarantee the match Vasco x Boca Juniors, for the CONMEBOL Sudamericana semifinal, at Maracanã, on October 20, at 9:30 PM. The urgency is huge: Vasco needs to inform CONMEBOL by October 5 which stadium will host the match. In the action, the club argues that São Januário does not meet the minimum capacity requirement established for the semifinals of the competition and emphasizes the structure of Maracanã to host a confrontation of this magnitude. The petition also cites a statement from the Military Police in favor of holding the game at the stadium. Vasco also claims to have a Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025 that provided for the use of Maracanã in matches of CBF, FIFA, or CONMEBOL competitions, in addition to establishing that any refusal should be based on technical and operational criteria. The preliminary request is clear: for the court to order the availability of Maracanã for Vasco x Boca Juniors, including the necessary conditions for the execution and organization of the match. The club also requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance with the possible court order and urgently requires the concessionaire to be notified so that the stadium can be confirmed with CONMEBOL within the deadline. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

Important statement from José Boto, director of Flamengo: “The Flamengo will not delay a salary. When the president says 'how am I going to pay Paquetá?', it’s not Paquetá, it’s the agreements made. It's like you at home. You count on the salary and if they don't pay, you won't be able to pay for the house, the car... And that's what happens here. We have important commitments in January!" https://t.co/yP9KuRgTxz #Flamengo #Futebol #Salário (translated)

"Flamengo will not delay a salary. When the president says 'how am I going to pay Paquetá?', it’s not about Paquetá, it’s about the agreements made. It's like you at home. You count on the salary and if they don’t pay, you won’t be able to pay for the house, the car... And that’s what happens here. We have important commitments in January!" https://t.co/ZlPSyQMbQ2 #Flamengo #Futebol #Salário (translated)

🇪🇸🇺🇸 Impulsamos la colaboración en infraestructuras y transportes con América Latina y el Caribe con el Memorando de Entendimiento que he firmado en Miami con @igoldfajn, presidente del Banco Iberoamericano de Desarrollo. https://t.co/0Ux6YwWxeT #Infraestructura #Colaboración #Desarrollo #ES #US #LA #CR

🚨 ATENCIÓN | Fernando Alonso ha firmado un CONTRATO A LARGO PLAZO con Aston Martin ‼️ Él será quién decida CUÁNDO y CÓMO retirarse ⚠️ Se ve VARIOS AÑOS MÁS en Fórmula 1 🐐 LA HISTORIA CONTINÚA... https://t.co/rsQTCcglPr #Formula1 #AstonMartin #FernandoAlonso

Esta es la dirección del Pacto Histórico provisional Se convoca la elección popular de delegados para la configuración democrática del Movimiento Pacto Histórico La votación será abierta, cualquier persona puede participar y votar en cualquier lugar del país, en las mesas electorales, cualquier persona se puede afiliar al movimiento, siempre que esté de acuerdo en el programa progresista del movimiento y la lucha por la democracia y la justicia social en Colombia u la Justicia Social. Se crearán equipos especiales para la investigación del fraude electoral y se exigirá que el candado Hash que impide la modificacion de un documento PDF, como ordena la ley, sea reincorporado a los formularios E14 como ordena la ley y el tratado internacional firmado por Colombia para impedir el fraude en elecciones locales. Se creará el equipo de defensa jurídica porque los perseguidos por el gobierno en su consigna de "destripar el progresismo" por ser un crimen de lesa humanidad incluído los extranjeros que ayudan en este camino e implica sanción penal nacional e internacional. Se creará un espacio comunicacional, que sea capaz de enfrentar el efecto de las granjas de bots que apoyan a Abelardo creando una matrix de falsedad y manipulación sobre la conciencia ciudadana. #PactoHistórico #JusticiaSocial #DemocraciaColombiana