Taylor Swift Brazil wrote that its members were on their way to a protest and that the TSBR correspondent was already on the front line. The account also declared support for Lula on behalf of the swifties. https://t.co/vUd0VN8C2Y #SWIFTIES #Lula #Manifestação (translated)
Uma pulseira para cada signo com o símbolo, um cristal e a pedra natural correspondente! ♈♉♊♋♌♍♎♏♐♑♒♓ Pagto por transf. banc., envio para toda a Europa. Pedidos: envie mensagem no whatsapp @SylviaRoque #macrame #bracelet #handcrafted #zodiac #naturalstone Quarteira, Algarve, Portugal 🇵🇹 💗 13 🇧🇷 13 ⭐ 13 🇧🇷 13 💗 13 🇧🇷 13 ⭐ 13 🇧🇷 13
The US president hopes to ease his party's pain before next month's midterm elections, writes the BBC's North America correspondent. #TrumpRussiaDeal #FuelPrices #MidtermElections2026
The US president hopes to ease his party's pain before next month's midterm elections, writes the BBC's North America correspondent. #FuelPrices #TrumpRussiaDeal #USElections2022
The Minister of Education, Fernando Alexandre, stated that the unfreezing of tuition fees, scheduled for the 2027/2028 academic year, will not drive students away from higher education, as there will be a corresponding increase in social support, ensuring that no one is excluded for economic reasons. #Educação #EnsinoSuperior #Propinas (translated)
BBC correspondent Joe Inwood explains how Pillay's childhood in South Africa led her to become a driving force in international law from Myanmar to Gaza. #NaviPillay #NobelPeacePrize #HumanRights
In Kiev, the Russian missile attack is transforming life under the bombs into a slow, desolate winter decline, as described by our correspondent. #Kiev #Ukraine #Guerre (translated)
A new film paints the Meta founder as a villain. But the tech firm seems immune to bad publicity, writes our North America tech correspondent. #Meta #SocialMedia #AI
"Maricarmen symbolized the many tenants in Spain who do not feel well protected and for prospective tenants who cannot find a home due to high prices," said Spain correspondent Edwin Winkels earlier. #wooncrisis #huurprijzen #Madrid (translated)
The BBC's Europe correspondent Nick Beake reports from a large demonstration in northern France. #StudentProtests #FranceDemonstrations #EducationFunding
The mass evacuation of American bombers from the UK points to concern in the Pentagon, our security correspondent writes. #USMilitary #IranTension #RAF_Fairford
BBC Ukraine correspondent Dan Johnson is near Kyiv's Northern Bridge, which has been hit for the second day in a row. #Ukraine #Russia #Kyiv
The post said NRK had returned to Budapest four months after Péter Magyar came to power, but a pre-arranged interview with the prime minister was cancelled after its team had arrived at Parliament. #Ungarn #NRK #PéterMagyar #NO #HU
Correspondent Guy Hoeks reflects on his time in Germany, where he observes the increasing fear and frustration of the Germans and notes that many still long for Angela Merkel, while the current political and economic situation gives the impression that Germany is beginning to resemble a third-world country. #Merkel #Duitsland #Heimwee (translated)
Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Vasco filed an appeal on Friday (02) at the TJRJ against the decision of the 2nd Civil Court that did not analyze its urgent request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors and suspended the process for 20 days, after a statement from Fla-Flu Serviços in 48 hours. According to Tutinha, Vasco argued that it needs to indicate the stadium to CONMEBOL by 10/05 for the match on 10/20 at 21:30, and that the suspension could make a subsequent decision pointless. The club requested that Judge Rose Marie Pimentel Martins, from the 5th Chamber of Public Law, grant the request directly for Maracanã to be made available. As an alternative, it requested the end of the suspension and that the first-instance judge analyze the preliminary injunction without waiting for the appeal related to the popular action. Tutinha reported that Vasco also contested the technical criteria used to deny the stadium and claimed a contradiction in the concessionaire's position on the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Vasco, Flamengo, and Fluminense. The club stated that the restrictions should be applied in a non-discriminatory manner and cited ten official matches held at Maracanã in May 2026, nine of them between the 9th and 30th, including games on consecutive days: Fluminense x Bolívar on 05/19, and Flamengo x Estudiantes on 05/20; Flamengo x Cusco on 05/26, and Fluminense x Deportivo La Guaira on 05/27. According to Tutinha, Vasco also mentioned the indication of Maracanã by PMERJ as the most suitable option for security planning. Among the requests, it included non-discriminatory commercial and operational conditions, a maximum ticket load according to the authorized capacity, and a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)
🚨 VASCO CONTESTS TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF FLA-FLU, POINTS OUT VIOLATION OF CONCESSION RULES AND CITES DECISION FROM TJRJ IN ACTION FOR MARACANÃ Vasco filed an obligation lawsuit on Wednesday (1st) with a request for urgent protective measures to try to secure the Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. In the action, the club directly questions the technical criteria used by Fla-Flu to deny the stadium, points out unequal treatment, supports violations of concession rules, and also explores a contradiction involving the Memorandum of Understanding. 📌 WHAT FLA-FLU ALLEGED In response to Vasco, the concessionaire pointed to the accumulated wear of the lawn, the climatic conditions of July and August, and the need to preserve the intervals designated for field maintenance. For 10/20, Fla-Flu specifically mentioned games of Fluminense on 10/18 and Flamengo on 10/22. With Vasco x Boca between these matches, there would be three games in five days. According to the concessionaire, this sequence would prevent procedures such as helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and repair of damage to the lawn. 📌 VASCO QUESTIONS THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION The first counterpoint is the lawn itself. Vasco highlights that, three days after the denial, it was announced that the existing field would be removed and new Bermuda Celebration rolls would be placed, with the return of football scheduled for 10/08. Vasco x Boca will be on 10/20. The club's thesis is that it would not be possible to use the accumulated wear of the old lawn as justification for a match that will take place 12 days after the return of football to the renewed field. 📌 GREENLEAF DOCUMENT IS USED BY VASCO Vasco also retrieves the technical planning prepared by Greenleaf, the company responsible for lawn maintenance, in August. According to the action, the document shows that the same procedures cited by Fla-Flu to deny Vasco x Boca have already been carried out in a concentrated manner between matches. The petition states that helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and damage repair have even been grouped in a single day after a match, even in a winter scenario and lawn wear. The question posed by Vasco is direct: if this work could be done in August to accommodate the sequence of games from Flamengo and Fluminense, why couldn't it be repeated in October, after the complete lawn replacement? 📌 INTERVAL BETWEEN GAMES Vasco also contests the argument of three games in five days by comparing the situation with the recent calendar of the Maracanã. The action argues that sequences with reduced intervals for Flamengo and Fluminense matches have already been admitted. For Vasco, if the necessary interval for lawn recovery is decisive for denying a match, that criterion must be applied equally to all clubs. 📌 SHOWS AND OTHER EVENTS The action also points out that the Maracanã hosts shows, religious gatherings, and events from other sports, including the installation of structures and occupancy of the field area. Vasco questions how the administration can reconcile these events with lawn preservation, yet considers it technically unfeasible to host a semifinal of CONMEBOL. According to the data presented in the action, at least seven extraordinary events unrelated to official football were held between 2025 and 09/30/2026. 📌 CONCESSION NOTICE Vasco cites item 3.4 of the Terms of Reference, which gives priority to football events from the official calendars of FIFA, CONMEBOL, CBF, and FERJ over other events. Vasco x Boca is an official semifinal of CONMEBOL. The action argues that there would be an "inversion of this priority" by accommodating shows and other events and denying the stadium for a match that, under the concession rules cited by the club, should have priority. The petition mentions "distortion of the concessionaire's obligations" and "violation of the equal treatment required by the Concession Notice." 📌 UNEQUAL TREATMENT Vasco summarizes its challenge in four points: • the lawn replacement would change the premise of accumulated wear; • Greenleaf's own planning would demonstrate that maintenance could be carried out between matches; • the calendar would show reduced intervals that have already been admitted for Flamengo and Fluminense; • other events are reconciled with the necessary care for field preservation. As a result, Vasco asserts that restrictions are being applied selectively. The action further cites clause 13.2 of the Concession Contract, which prohibits favoritism and unjustifiably different, discriminatory treatment, or "without technical criteria" that results in restricted access to the Complex. 📌 THE CONTRADICTION POINTED OUT BY VASCO Fla-Flu claims not to recognize the validity of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025. At the same time, according to Vasco, it uses the document itself—especially the provision for four matches conditioned on availability and operational conditions—to justify the denial. Vasco points out contradictory behavior and invokes the principle of good faith. 📌 PREVIOUS DECISION OF TJRJ The action also cites the Instrument Appeal No. 3023517-70.2026.8.19.0000. On that occasion, Justice Alexandre Freitas Câmara analyzed the discussion regarding the absence of Fla-Flu's signature on the Memorandum. The magistrate stated that Flamengo and Fluminense, members of the concessionaire, had signed the document and pointed out that disregarding it later could represent contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. 📌 RECOMMENDATION FROM BEPE The issue of public safety also appears as an argument for the use of the Maracanã. According to the action, BEPE (Specialized Battalion for Policing in Stadiums) recommended holding the match at the Maracanã due to the magnitude of the confrontation and the expected public turnout. Vasco uses this recommendation to argue that the Maracanã is not just a preference of the club. The petition points to the stadium as the option that best meets capacity, location, structure, security, and operational conditions to host the match against Boca. 📌 SÃO JANUÁRIO IS NOT AN OPTION Vasco also differentiates the situation from the previous process involving Vasco x Vitória, when it did not obtain a preliminary injunction to use the Maracanã. This time, according to the action, São Januário cannot host the semifinal. The South American Manual requires a minimum capacity of 30,000 spectators starting from the semifinals, while the petition indicates São Januário has approximately 21,880 seats. Vasco acknowledges the Nilton Santos Stadium as an alternative but argues that having another stadium does not resolve the issue brought to Justice: is there legitimate technical and contractual basis for Fla-Flu to deny Maracanã? 📌 WHAT VASCO SEEKS Vasco is seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Fla-Flu to make the Maracanã available for Vasco x Boca on 10/20 at 9:30 PM. The request includes the maximum ticket allocation corresponding to the authorized capacity, the use of necessary facilities for organizing the match, the implementation of a mosaic, and temporary installation of banners in the same manner allowed for the clubs that are members of the concessionaire. In case of non-compliance, Vasco requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million. Vasco must inform CONMEBOL by October 5 where it will hold the return match of the semifinal. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)
Israeli citizens heroically thwarted a terrorist attack and saved hundreds of lives. Perhaps even more if the plane had crashed in Tel Aviv. The NOS reports: "Pilot tries to let plane heading to Israel crash." And then asks the correspondent: "Does Israel see this as an attempt at a terrorist attack?" Why does the NOS have the pathological urge to immediately downplay when Israel is a victim? At the same time, they are quick to portray Israel as a terrorist state as soon as a Hamas or Hezbollah member is killed. #SaneerdeNPO #SaneerdeNPO #Israël #terrorisme #media (translated)
BBC correspondent Azadeh Moshiri reports from Delhi, where hundreds of women are protesting. #WomenAgainstViolence #DelhiProtests #EndRapeCulture
12 oktober 2017, Ambassade Hotel Amsterdam: urenlange ontmoeting met Jared Taylor, een Amerikaan uit de alt-rightbeweging die meent dat ‘het blanke ras’ met uitsterven wordt bedreigd, aldus De Correspondent. #Extreemrechts #Normalisering #Politiek
O Sport Club do Recife informa que o Superior Tribunal de Justiça Desportiva (STJD) deferiu a liminar requerida pelo Clube e determinou ao Náutico a readequação dos valores dos ingressos destinados à torcida visitante para o clássico deste sábado, nos Aflitos. A decisão reconhece a aplicação do item 7.1 do Manual de Competições da CBF, observada a legislação referente à meia-entrada. Em cumprimento à decisão do STJD, o Sport comercializará os ingressos adquiridos antecipadamente pelo valor de R$50,00, correspondente ao dobro do menor preço praticado pelo time mandante, conforme estabelece a legislação. Para garantir que o torcedor rubro-negro não fosse prejudicado enquanto a questão era analisada, o Sport adquiriu antecipadamente a carga de ingressos pelo valor exigido pelo mandante, deixando expressamente resguardados os seus direitos. A diferença será integralmente absorvida pelo Clube neste momento, que buscará posteriormente o devido ressarcimento pelas vias competentes. O Sport informa também que não adquiriu nenhum ingresso meia-entrada. A venda dos ingressos será realizada pela plataforma FUTEBOLCARD. O Sport Club do Recife continuará utilizando todos os meios legítimos e institucionais para defender o direito da sua torcida de acompanhar o Leão onde quer que ele jogue. #SportClubdoRecife #Ingressos #Futebol
