Search

SandroSca had described Spalletti's Juventus as a team that maintained possession, surrounded the opponents, and won back many balls, forcing them into their own half. In his opinion, however, the play was slow and lacking in incisiveness, with wingers oriented towards dribbling or makeshift full-backs, little quality in the midfield, and a center forward who did not fulfill that role. He had also noted that the team conceded a goal from the opponent's first shot. https://t.co/gmdCxSnmU4 #Juventus #SerieA #Calcio (translated)

Marie🌸 stated that Checo was posting excellent times despite the car he was driving. She pointed out that he had recorded times similar to Alonso's and that, at some moments, he had been faster than Albon, although the latter was on medium tires. She also noted that Bottas, on medium tires, had been up to a second slower than Checo. #F1 #ChecoPerez #Carrera (translated)

Felipe Zuleta Lleras published a satirical message in which he claimed that leftists had run out of internet. In an ironic tone, he said he hoped they could manage to open doors, use scissors, and take a spiral notebook without the help of the network, and added that La Brincona had made them dance. #Urgente #Lentos #Solidaridad (translated)

Federico Albano wrote that Max Verstappen had not received penalties. According to reports from the stewards, the driver had completely lifted his foot off the accelerator and was already 70 km/h slower compared to a flying lap. Albano added that Lewis Hamilton was braking and that, to avoid surpassing Verstappen, he would have had to brake sharply, creating an even more dangerous situation. Albano stated that he believed the decision was logically correct, but he did not recall similar cases and still had some doubts. He finally observed that Verstappen would start from pole the following day and that, in his opinion, he already had the sprint in the bag. #SingaporeGP #F1 #Verstappen #SingaporeGP (translated)

Federico Albano wrote that Ferrari had been very quick with the medium tires, but in SQ3 they lost the necessary tenths to fight for pole when it was crucial to extract the maximum from the tires and especially from the engine. In his view, the car was competitive in various phases and direction changes, but it lost speed on the straights due to aerodynamic drag and low power. He added that the gap to Mercedes and Red Bull increased on the straights and decreased in parts of the mixed sections. Albano called Leclerc's lap “super” and wrote that Hamilton had risked everything in SQ3 but had made several mistakes. Until that moment, according to him, Lewis seemed to have an even better pace than Charles, but the Monegasque finished with two very strong laps. The author attributed pole to Verstappen, noting it had yet to be confirmed, and described Red Bull as the strongest team at the moment. According to his analysis, the car was very fast on the straights, stable in the mixed sections, and capable of limiting losses in slow corners. Verstappen had gained 0.3 seconds on Leclerc already at the end of the first sector, all on the straights, Albano wrote. In his opinion, Red Bull had found the right setup, and the data reminded him of 2022: the car had less downforce, but Verstappen's driving style hid the effect, while speed on the straights remained decisive. Albano described Mercedes as disappointed: Russell had clocked 0.5 seconds faster than Antonelli, but the update package, which he described as extensive, costly, and awaited, was not working. He added that Kimi had also refused the new wing. According to the data he examined, the front end was no longer functioning well, exhibiting understeer in medium-speed corners and difficulty turning the car in slow corners; the increase in aerodynamic drag also hindered deployment. Albano wrote that Antonelli struggled even under braking because he no longer trusted the front end and that, despite the differences between the Singapore and Sepang tracks, what he had seen so far reminded him of the same script. According to Albano, McLaren was not far off but had disappointed in terms of track characteristics and seemed to struggle with a lack of grip, especially when maximum performance was needed. He noted that Ferrari and McLaren, on one side, and Red Bull and Mercedes, on the other, were developing different concepts that ended up producing similar characteristics, except for the Mercedes updates, which in his view were not working. Finally, Albano wrote that the sprint would show whether those cars would be able to create overtaking opportunities or if the race would turn into a train, awaiting the decisive qualifying for Sunday. #Formula1 #SingaporeGP #Motorsport (translated)

The author wrote that Max Verstappen did not receive a penalty for overtaking Lewis Hamilton under yellow flag. According to his publication, the stewards considered that the overtaking was unintentional due to the significant speed difference between them. He added that Verstappen was 70 km/h slower than on the previous lap and still overtook Hamilton. (translated)

Sture Fjäder wrote that the red-green coalition in Helsinki had passed a decision stating that the city would no longer accept advertising related to fossil fuels, such as advertising for flying. He questioned whether those who supported the decision would themselves give up flying on their travels, and assessed that they would not do so. Fjäder described the action as green posturing. #viherposeeraus https://t.co/qbovaaryzX #Helsinki #ilmastonmuutos #kestäväkehitys (translated)

Sture Fjäder wrote that Helsinki, according to him, bans all advertisements that use fossil fuels. He criticized the city council's bans and stated that he was glad to have moved away from Helsinki. #lentomainontakiellot https://t.co/LKwKKDcned #Helsinki #mainonta #ympäristö (translated)

Tanja Aidanjuuri wrote that the plan in Helsinki to ban advertising of fossil fuels could, according to her, cost the city nearly 100 million euros in advertising revenue. She criticized the proposal as unnecessary and absurd and listed as examples of potentially restricted advertising gasoline and diesel cars, flights, cruises, synthetic clothing, plastic products, and fossil fuels. Aidanjuuri described that the Greens in Vantaa could, in her opinion, follow the same line and that advertising would then practically be limited to, for example, veggie sausages, rainbow flags, and new mosques. She also pointed out that taxpayer money would be used for the handling of the matter. Aidanjuuri cited a proposal stating that the advertising ban would be investigated in the preparation of the next outdoor advertising agreement for Helsinki's public areas and that the advertising agreements of Urban Traffic Ltd would also be taken into account. The assessment would examine, among other things, the legal boundaries of the ban, its climate and environmental impacts, effects on the city's economy, the city's own communication and marketing, as well as the media landscape. The proposal also mentioned the possibility of examining advertising's ethical principles more broadly and limiting outdoor advertising from entities considered to violate human rights and particularly polluting industries. #Helsinki #ilmastonmuutos #mainonta (translated)

Mats Uotila wrote that the representatives of the Left Alliance, the Greens, and the SDP had returned by plane from a study trip to Vienna shortly before the Helsinki city council's vote and supported a ban that would prevent, for example, the display of airplane advertisements on the city's billboards. Uotila considered this action hypocritical. #Helsinki #politiikka #ympäristö (translated)

The author claimed that Trump and his so-called Secretary of Defense had lost more aircraft than the United States in any war since the Vietnam War. He described this as an achievement and asked what kind of America was being made again. #EliTrump #Sotaministeri #USA #FI (translated)