Johan Romin

Johan Romin wrote that the Nobel laureate Navi Pillay led the UN commission that accused Israel of genocide in Gaza. He referred to an article where he reviewed the commission's evidence and described it as weak and based on uncertain third-hand information in the media. https://t.co/ZN6ecwuWKT #Nobelpris #Folkmord #Gaza (translated)

Johan Romin wrote that he had 322 higher education credits, which according to him corresponded to almost 5.5 years at university, and that he was therefore not completely uneducated. He also wondered how many higher education credits Owe had. https://t.co/J3Ktu0DbMr #högskolepoäng #utbildning #universitet (translated)

Johan Romin wrote that a woman, when asked if the parties had come to any agreement during the day, answered that they had not. He added that they were therefore not even in agreement about being disagreeable. https://t.co/pPMa3IWqxd #politik #partier #överenskommelse (translated)

Johan Romin wrote that Swedish journalists had long struggled to understand the situation in Gaza. He claimed that Hamas was driving the recurring wars and many casualties, describing the movement's goal as the annihilation of Israel and the expulsion or killing of the country's Jews. According to Romin, Hamas representatives had said this in interviews, and the movement's actions did not contradict their stated goals. Romin wrote that Hamas had been building tunnels for decades with funding from the Western world, while TV crews did not understand what the work was about. He recounted that he had filmed in Hamas tunnels without then understanding their purpose. In 2015, he claimed to have filmed an ongoing tunnel construction at a street corner in northern Gaza and was arrested and interrogated by Hamas. He also wrote that Hamas had worked to foster a new generation of terrorists and suicide bombers. As an example, he mentioned a studio at the al-Aqsa television channel, where, according to him, there was a Quran on the table and a picture of Goofy alongside a child about to sacrifice himself for the al-Aqsa mosque. #Gaza #Hamas #Israel (translated)

Johan Romin asked why the other user had been aggressive and unpleasant in their comment. He wrote that the people were not refugees but economic migrants seeking a better life, and claimed that they could have returned to Sweden. According to Romin, 200,000 of them did, and he referred to research on the matter. He also suggested that the other user might not want to read it. #migration #ekonomi #forskning (translated)

Johan Romin criticized the setup in Agenda and wrote that the program first featured a segment with two leftist Social Democrats and then a studio with two more. He argued that this followed a discussion based on the premise that the Left Party should be included in the government and that the Centre Party should change its stance. #Agenda (translated)

Johan Romin wrote that she had gone to the elections with a government alternative that was not real, as both KD and L had said no. He claimed that one could not promise a certain government when the intended coalition parties had rejected it from the start. https://t.co/HpI4JSmE4Z #politik #val2023 #regering (translated)

Johan Romin asked what a woman meant by saying that Jesus had migrated and wondered if she was referring to him being born in Nazareth and traveling to Jerusalem, a distance of a hundred kilometers. He also questioned what that had to do with Sweden and the Center Party. #migration #religion #politik (translated)

Who said this a few years ago: "We therefore support the election of Andreas Norlén as Speaker, a Speaker who can unite, not divide." Yes, it was the Social Democrats. Today they describe the Left Party's support for Norlén as almost a betrayal. https://t.co/zhVqFf68WM #politik #Sverige #demokrati (translated)

Lena Hallengren tar verkligen priset idag: I riksdagens talarstol sa hon nyss att det är S "yttersta önskan att vi återgår till praxis", men i nästa mening säger hon att S ska rösta för Centerpartiets Kerstin Lundgren som 3:e vice talman – vilket är helt emot riksdagens praxis. #politik #riksdagen #Sverige