Wagner Thomazoni

Wagner Thomazoni questioned whether Cellbit felt persecuted for his political positions and if he was aware of the effects of cancel culture. He also asked if he believed that thousands of people — including mothers, grandmothers, fathers, and children — had been imprisoned for years due to protests, and challenged the idea that elderly women with Bibles were about to stage a coup d'état. Thomazoni stated that there were thousands of political prisoners condemned in exceptional trials and that some may have died in prison after being denied medical care. He also accused the current government of appointing a minister to the Supreme Court who allegedly used state power to persecute a journalist and break the confidentiality of their source after reports exposing crimes. Finally, he criticized Cellbit for, according to him, remaining indifferent to these issues as he lived in a protected bubble. #Cancelamento #Política #DireitosHumanos (translated)

Wagner Thomazoni wrote that the left was realizing that the real world differed from the Twitter bubble, where, according to him, its members blocked those who disagreed and supported the removal of right-wing profiles. He stated that, in general, the louder a group was on the platform, the lower its representation was in the real world. #LiberdadeDeExpressão #Realidade #DireitosCivis (translated)

Her only mistake is pretending that this was not already happening in 2022 because she needs to maintain the narrative of "coup." However, it's good that this year the press is being less complicit with the true dictatorship of the country. #golpe #ditadura #imprensa (translated)

Damn, they managed to cancel the Globo debate! Look at the level to which the legal insecurity of this country has reached! Anyone who still pretends this is a democracy has to get screwed. #democracia #insegurançaJurídica #debate (translated)

Why hasn't the MBL done a live with Emanuel for him to deny this whole story and put the doubts to rest once and for all? There’s already audio of the Phallic Man. If they let Emanuel speak, it will become clear once and for all whether the voice of the Phallic Man is his or not. Of course, this would only be a problem if Emanuel is the Phallic Man and if it becomes impossible to pretend that his voice can’t be recognized, because then it wouldn’t be possible to pretend that they themselves didn’t know who he was since the moment that audio leaked… But it is what it is, the MBL wouldn’t want to shield a possible Nazi who was with them, right? Can anyone find a reasonable reason why this live with Emanuel still hasn’t happened? Isn’t it better to settle the controversy once and for all in such a simple way? #MBL #Emanuel #polêmica (translated)

I was really curious to know the official explanation from MBL and the first impression is horrible, as it already starts with an easily verifiable lie. I haven't watched the entire podcast yet, but in this excerpt here, Arthur is objectively lying. The case 1505278-93.2026.8.26.0454 is accessible to any lawyer. I was able to access it through mine and asked her to explain it to me. The case is NOT about Nazism and the profile The Phallic Man is NOT among the accused! In fact, it is exactly the OPPOSITE! The legal group of MBL says NOT TO INVESTIGATE Phallic Man because they already knew he was Emanuel and even say that he is with the movement! The reported profiles are: - Ian Lucas - Robberbaron - Hansa And the police report is for extortion, absolutely NOTHING TO DO with Nazism! If there really is a request for investigation into Nazism regarding the Phallic Man profile by MBL, this document has simply never been presented, at least as far as I know. The only document I know that talks about him is this one, and it seems to be the one Arthur is talking about because he cites the fact that the document identifies Phallic Man as Emanuel. “If Phallic Man was not accused, why is he in the document?” Because there were records of interaction between him and some investigated profiles, including participation in Spaces, and that is why the legal group of MBL appears to clarify that there is no need to worry about him because he is with MBL. In other words, the document that Arthur uses as “evidence” that they are not with the guy because they reported him actually proves exactly the opposite, that they did not want to report the guy because they are together! Arthur says in the podcast “don’t believe me, you can research” - but he knows that the party’s supporters will not research anything and will only repeat the lie. Those who really research will see that he is inverting reality. It's concerning that they are lying dramatically about something so serious. #MBL #FakeNews #Justiça (translated)

MBL does not advocate for null votes on principle, especially since they campaigned for Nunes, whom they called a bandit since the first round, with the excuse that "Boulos was worse." They know that Lula is worse for the country, but they think Lula is better for them as a political group... It has never been so obvious that the campaign for a null vote is just a veiled campaign for Lula... They are practically admitting this publicly now. #VotoNulo #Política #Eleições (translated)

I can't understand this strategy of "let's win this election by making everyone hate us, except for the tiny bubble of trained cattle who accept absolutely all the party's impositions without questioning anything!" Nothing else makes sense in this movement. https://t.co/82OadoorX2 #Política #Eleições2024 #Brasil (translated)

As pessoas mais estúpidas desse país vão tentar te convencer de que esses dois gols, com o Brasil totalmente postado na defesa, foram culpa de um atacante que estava jogando do lado oposto ao lance dos dois gols, porque “ele não pressiona e fez o Brasil perder o meio de campo” sendo que antes dele entrar o Brasil já tinha menos de 30% de posse de bola e a Noruega já tinha trocado mais que o dobro de passes. O Brasil já tinha escolhido chamar a Noruega pro seu campo de defesa e deixá-los com a bola desde o primeiro minuto de partida. Você pode culpar o Ancelotti pela estratégia, pode culpar até o Endrick porque foi ele quem errou o bote que deixou o norueguês cruzar livre pro Haaland, além de ter perdido um gol cara-a-cara (mas também acho errado cobrar um moleque de 19 anos jogando sua primeira Copa, porém ele deu alguns motivos pra isso), você pode culpar o Gabriel Magalhães que foi superado pelo Haaland como se fosse um cone, pode culpar o Danilo por deixar o Haaland dominar, escorar e armar o chute sem dar o bote e ainda tomando no meio das pernas, se você for MUITO LOUCO pode até tentar culpar o Alisson por não ter feito um milagre, mas culpar o atacante que estava do outro lado do campo fazendo exatamente a mesma coisa que os outros atacantes fizeram durante todo o jogo, respeitando completamente a orientação do treinador? Aí você é simplesmente um completo iletrado em futebol. “Ah, mas o Neymar tem que ser cobrado porque é o mais experiente” - Então faz mais sentido cobrar de Casemiro e Marquinhos, que são tão experientes quanto e compunham o sistema defensivo que foi tantas vezes vencido com facilidade nessa Copa, não o maior artilheiro da história da seleção que entrou no final, cumpriu sua função e ainda fez o gol de honra. “Mas o Neymar ficou tretando com o goleiro!” - Aí é realmente só doideira pra encontrar qualquer motivo por mais besta que seja pra criticar e culpar o cara. Na pior das hipóteses ele desestabilizou o goleiro adversário e meteu gol nele, você achar que a provocação do Neymar teve qualquer impacto na eliminação só não faz sentido mesmo. Neymar nessa Copa era um reserva de luxo, entrou duas vezes no final das partidas e contribuiu mais ofensivamente que vários dos nossos titulares. Vini Jr era pra ser nosso craque titular e simplesmente sumiu nos jogos decisivos. Bruno Guimarães, por mais que tenha feito uma boa Copa, não pode perder um pênalti daqueles… Na lista de “culpados” pela eliminação o Neymar tá sem dúvida no final da fila. Qualquer análise que chegue num resultado diferente disso é puro hate imbecil de quem só assiste futebol de 4 em 4 anos e olhe lá (não a toa é a opinião mais recorrente entre a mulherada do Twitter kkkkk se você concorda com elas, já deve saber que a chance de estar errado é enorme). #Futebol #Brasil #CopaMundo