Bonifacio Castellane

Bonifacio Castellane argued that, in a state where half of the population worked in the public sector or was part of what he called the "Gramscian parastate," it was quite plausible that the person responsible for tax collection would run for the leadership of the country. #Politica #Italia #Società (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane argued that expanding welfare would fuel social conflict, because it would never be enough and would leave an increasing number of people excluded, ready to ask why others received help and they did not. He also stated that the "Gramscian Parastate" was killing the organism that hosted it and that we had now reached that point. #welfare #conflittoSociale #esclusione (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane defined a political regression as presenting it as an injustice to prevent someone from occupying another person's house. He attributed this backwardness to 15 years spent arguing that a man dressed in women's clothes was a woman and had menstruation. #ingiustizia #politica #diritti (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane recalled that the Consulta took eight years to rule on the Porcellum and 20 months on Renzi's Italicum. He then doubted that a decision would come "by February" and sarcastically commented that not voting in the referendum was the right choice. #Porcellum #Italicum #Referendum (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane wrote that the left in Brussels had voted against the ban on the Muslim Brotherhood and the burqa. He ironically added that that vote aimed to defend Christianity, not to protect the raw materials of the "Gramscian Parastate." #Bruxelles #Sinistra #Burqa (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane argued that robots should be banned, as Bernie and Mamdani were allegedly trying to do, or find the funds to support 10 million immigrants who, according to him, were demanding more money while threatening to burn everything down. He predicted interesting years ahead. #robot #immigrazione #società (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane wondered why, in his opinion, it was considered necessary to expand welfare to prevent second-generation immigrants from burning down schools, while at the same time wanting to contain social costs by introducing euthanasia for the elderly and depressed people. #Welfare #Immigrazione #Società (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane maintained that there was no right to be supported by the State, distinguishing it from the right to produce goods, which could range from bread to the Sistine Chapel. He added that anyone could choose to donate what they possessed, but that such a choice did not create an acquired right for the recipient, and he concluded that desires were not equivalent to rights. #Diritti #Libertà #Economia (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane wrote that France allocated 57% of its GDP to public spending and wondered why immigrants were burning schools while asking for more spending. He argued that the level of spending already reached meant that the country could spend even more and clarified that his message was not ironic. #Francia #SpesaPubblica #Immigrazione (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane reported that Fazzolari believed that Vannacci would receive as many votes as Fini or Alfano and that, consequently, it was not necessary to talk to him. Castellane added that Fazzolari would surely have been right, but he wondered whether, conversely, he understood the political price to pay or if the matter only interested him to a certain extent. #politica #voti #Italia (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane argued that those who spoke about housing costs in Milan and the expulsion of the middle class should acknowledge Sala's role, whom he accused of implementing that process. He also asked whether these people were pretending to ignore it and whom they believed they could deceive. #Milano #CetoMedio #Casa (translated)

Bonifacio Castellane observed that those who hoped immigrants would set schools on fire and those who wondered why such episodes did not happen in Italy, in his view, were calling for a huge electoral boost for Giorgia Meloni. He argued that no one on the right wished for such events, even knowing they would favor the right. He justified this difference with two reasons he defined as anthropological: he said that a person on the right would prefer to avoid damage to the Trevi Fountain or the loss of votes, while a person on the left would prioritize the release of their emotions, trusting that the "Gramscian Parastate" would then remedy the consequences. #Immigrazione #Politica #Elettorale (translated)