Katrīna Iļjinska wrote that among the three candidates — Jaunzeme, Kalviņa, and Kaspars Gorkšs — her choice would be in favor of Gorkšs, although she is not knowledgeable about football. Iļjinska claimed that the VID led by Jaunzeme has severely affected many small and medium enterprises, including her own, and that Jaunzeme had refused to participate in uncomfortable interviews. Regarding Kalviņa, Iļjinska wrote that she leads an institution that organizes a lot of what she considers pointless courses at the expense of state funds, and a significant portion of the expenses is related to catering. Iļjinska viewed this as wasteful. She also pointed out that neither entrepreneurs nor organizations like the Employers' Confederation would keep in office a leader who is not competent and capable. Iļjinska considered Gorkšs' selection, made by Andris Kulbergs, to be obvious for a government that promised to defend entrepreneurs' interests and implement reforms. She expressed that it would be strange if the new government chose someone from the previous administration for reform implementation, as she believed they would be unable to execute the reforms. Iļjinska identified the most peculiar aspect of the process as the competition requirements but considered them understandable since the competition was prepared during the previous government with the intention of changing nothing; hence, she believed the resistance was logical. #futbols #valdība #uzņēmējdarbība (translated)
