Search

Planeta do Futebol reported that, after an unfavorable court decision, the Fla-Flu Consortium asked the court to reject a new appeal from Vasco regarding ticket sales for the match against Boca Juniors. The concessionaire stated that the club should assume the risks of having sold tickets while the injunction could still be suspended. The Consortium argued that the appeal had lost its object due to the proximity of the deadline and that it repeated already rejected arguments. It advocated for the match to be held at Nilton Santos Stadium and stated that there would still be time to reorganize the event. According to the publication, Vasco urgently requested reconsideration of the suspension and claimed that it had begun sales for Maracanã after receiving court authorization. The club argued that the capacity of Nilton Santos, which is 44,661 people, was less than the 46,014 tickets sold, which would require cancellations and refunds. It also pointed out the need to accommodate 4,000 visiting fans and maintain separation areas between the supporters. The appeal from Vasco and the statement from the Fla-Flu Consortium were awaiting analysis from Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, reported Planeta do Futebol, based on ESPN Brazil. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

The Football Planet reported that Cauan Barros, from Vasco, was admitted to a hospital in Rio de Janeiro after a car accident. According to initial information cited by the PodCruzmaltino profile, the player suffered a deep cut on his left foot and was receiving medical attention. https://t.co/n0Jst3xOdf #Vasco #CauanBarros #Acidente (translated)

The Football Planet reported that Vasco would appeal the court decision that overturned the injunction requiring the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for the match against Boca Juniors. According to the publication, the club would not publicly comment and would try to regain the stadium through behind-the-scenes negotiations. This information was attributed to ESPN Brazil and Pedro Ivo Almeida. #Vasco #Maracanã #FlaFlu (translated)

The Planet of Football reported that a decision by Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães suspended the injunction that required the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. According to the publication, the legal dispute continued. The judge reportedly understood that Marco Antônio Ibrahim could not alone review the decision of the rapporteur Alexandre de Carvalho Mesquita and that the appeal should be analyzed by the rapporteur himself or by a panel. She also reportedly pointed out the risk of having three rival fan bases in the same area, as Flamengo vs. Botafogo, for basketball, would be held that evening at Maracanãzinho. According to the report, Suely cited a report from BEPE that deemed Nilton Santos suitable to host the match and stated that the police's preference for Maracanã did not make its use indispensable for safety. The decision, the publication added, did not determine whether Vasco had the right to the stadium nor whether the consortium's refusal was legitimate. The writ of security would be forwarded to rapporteur Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, and the decision would be submitted to the Special Body of TJ-RJ. The publication attributed the information to the newspaper O Globo. #Maracanã #Vasco #Justiça (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that the Fla-Flu Consortium appealed to the president of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro to try to reverse the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the profile, the consortium filed a writ of security and requested an urgent measure while the appeal was being analyzed. The consortium stated it had authorized six requests from Vasco since the start of the concession, including classics against Flamengo and Fluminense. The authorization for the match with Boca Juniors would remain valid, unless the court accepted the request, the profile added, citing O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Futebol (translated)

Wesley Curty stated that they tried to ridicule and suffocate CRVG, but lost again. He asked for the announcement to be respected and described the public stadium as the second home of the Vasco fans. He also used derogatory language about unhoused people, demanded that the lawn be prepared for the "Bacalhau," stated that the manager was not the owner, and ended with a provocation. https://t.co/CwiQkmYd84 #CRVG #Vasco #Futebol (translated)

Planeta do Futebol reported that the Justice of Rio de Janeiro had accepted, on that day, an appeal from Vasco and ordered the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for the semifinal of the South American Cup against Boca Juniors. According to the profile, the appellate judge considered public safety and the protection of fans to be more relevant than the issues regarding the pitch claimed by the consortium. The publication stated that the decision took into account favorable expressions from the Public Ministry and the Military Police, a memorandum between the parties regarding the use of the stadium by Vasco, and the deadline set by Conmebol, which would expire the following day. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)

The page Planeta do Futebol reported that the Justice of Rio de Janeiro rejected, on this date, a new request for the Vasco x Boca Juniors match to be held at Maracanã. The popular action attempted to involve the Government of Rio. According to the publication, the judge assessed that the new arguments did not change previous decisions and that the preference for Maracanã for security reasons did not require the stadium to be made available. The decision also mentioned an opinion from the Military Police that considered Nilton Santos suitable. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that BEPE considered São Januário inadequate to host Vasco x Boca Juniors, citing difficulties in separating the fans, controlling the visitors, and organizing access. According to the profile, the battalion pointed to Maracanã as the most suitable option. Vasco needed to indicate the stadium to Conmebol by Saturday. The Public Ministry of Rio recommended the release of Maracanã and suggested to Governor Ricardo Couto an intervention to make the match possible, the profile wrote. The consultation of the Fla-Flu Consortium with BEPE regarding Nilton Santos concluded that the stadium was suitable, although the battalion maintained a preference for Maracanã. The profile emphasized that Vasco had not made this inquiry. São Januário received positive opinions from the Fire Department and the City Hall, but its chances of being released were small, according to the publication. The profile added that Pedrinho would continue trying to obtain Maracanã through the Justice system, with São Januário as a backup plan. Nilton Santos was the plan C: Vasco had not yet officially approached Botafogo, although Pedrinho had already sought information about the stadium. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that Vasco did not intend to request the Nilton Santos stadium from Botafogo and preferred Maracanã to face Boca Juniors, although it could also play at São Januário. According to the profile, after having a preliminary injunction denied by the Court of Rio de Janeiro, the club was preparing an appeal in Brasília and was counting on its good relationship with the CBF to try to obtain a favorable decision from the STF. The publication cited O Globo Esportes and journalist Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #Botafogo #Maracanã (translated)

The Football Planet reported that Pedrinho, president of Vasco, argued with a council member during a meeting of the Deliberative Council. According to the publication, Pedrinho said that the council member made a serious accusation and would need to prove it in court, as well as insulting him. The publication attributed the information to Jota P. Fragoso and the video to CRVG TV. https://t.co/CpZiOvpNWM #Vasco #Futebol #Polêmica (translated)

The Planet of Football reported that a judge from Rio de Janeiro denied, on the 6th, an appeal from Vasco to play against Boca Juniors at the Maracanã. According to the publication, the decision could still be changed until Saturday, the deadline for the club to indicate the location to Conmebol. The judge reportedly considered a more in-depth analysis of the evidence regarding the pitch, the calendar, and the operation necessary, in addition to requesting a response from the Fla-Flu Consortium. Vasco claimed unequal treatment and selective application of criteria, according to the post. The publication added that the Public Ministry recommended the use of the Maracanã, but the judge considered the recommendation non-binding for the Fla-Flu Consortium and insufficient to replace the contractual, technical, and operational assessments. #Vasco #Maracanã #BocaJuniors (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that the information presented in the follow-up of the Judicial Recovery detailed the financial situation of Vasco and the SAF in 2026. According to him, the updated balance of loans was R$ 287.9 million: R$ 282.4 million in principal and R$ 5.5 million in interest and adjustment. Of this total, R$ 84 million corresponded to Crefisa and R$ 203.9 million to Almirante. Tutinha reported that the loan from Crefisa had a yield of CDI + 7% per year and quarterly amortizations until September 2028. Of the contracts with Almirante, R$ 156.5 million were updated by the CDI, maturing in December 2027, and R$ 47.4 million by the INPC, with maturities in July and August 2027. In July and August, according to him, two loans were contracted with Almirante Participações, of R$ 40 million and R$ 5.6 million, both with a single payment due in 2027. The operation of R$ 40 million also provided for a fiduciary assignment of part of the LFU receivables linked to the commercial appeal criterion. The consolidated tax debt of the recovering companies was approximately R$ 271 million and reached R$ 334 million with adjustments, fines, and interest, wrote Tutinha. During negotiations with the PGFN, Vasco and the Prosecutor's Office supposedly agreed to temporarily reduce the installments of the installments to R$ 580 thousand monthly until the consolidation of a new transaction. The cash balance reported on August 31 was R$ 5.6 million. Between January and August, the cash flow recorded R$ 201.4 million in receipts related to economic rights of athletes, according to Tutinha. Rayan accounted for R$ 171.9 million; Leandrinho was also mentioned with R$ 9.3 million; João Victor, with R$ 5.6 million; Luiz Gustavo, with R$ 5.3 million; Loide, with R$ 2.1 million; and Galarza, with R$ 2 million. Tutinha attributed the increase in marketing revenues in June to the receipt, in a single installment, of R$ 25 million from the master sponsorship contract with SportingBet. The SAF reported, according to Tutinha's account, that cash outflows in August were lower because R$ 46.6 million in payments were deferred to September: R$ 32.6 million in transfer fees, R$ 5.5 million in commissions, R$ 4.5 million in signing bonuses, R$ 3.4 million in taxes, and R$ 630 thousand in TEF. The cash flow recorded R$ 56.8 million in restructuring disbursements between January and August. The breakdown presented by the SAF, however, totaled R$ 59.1 million: R$ 21.9 million for the CNRD, R$ 19.5 million for tax installment plans, R$ 6.8 million related to Judicial Recovery, R$ 5.3 million for the Judicial Administrator and legal and financial advisors, R$ 4.3 million in transfers to the CRVG and R$ 1.3 million for BACEN. Tutinha observed that the itemized amounts did not match the total recorded in the cash flow. According to the numbers disclosed by him, the SAF had 46,347 active clients in the supporter program in January and 35,790 in August, a reduction of approximately 10.5 thousand. Of the clients registered in August, 35,214 were up to date with their payments. Tutinha also wrote that Vasco claimed to be meeting its obligations under the Judicial Recovery Plan on time and settling debts incurred after the recovery request and extrajudicial credits. In the CNRD, the club was to allocate R$ 15 million per year for the payment of three plans; the credits were adjusted by the IPCA and were not subject to discounts. Regarding the agreement concluded in September, Tutinha reported that 777 declared it did not oppose the establishment of the New SAF, the creation of the UPI Equity, the judicial sale of 90% of the shares, nor the transfer of the shares to the winner of the competitive process. The former controller also reportedly stated that it would withdraw from incidents and appeals related to Judicial Recovery and relinquish respective claims. Tutinha affirmed that the numbers outlined the financial operation of Vasco as the club moved towards a new phase of restructuring and the completion of the sale of the New SAF. #Vasco #Futebol #Finanças (translated)

newscolina reported that a meeting of the Deliberative Council of Vasco was scheduled for today to discuss and vote on the proposal from Almirante Participações for the football SAF and a change to the club's statute. According to the club's advisory, in contact with Danteskoo, CRVG TV would broadcast the meeting on YouTube. The publication credited the image to Marcelo Wance. #Vasco #futebol #SAF (translated)

Planet Football reported that Vasco intended to suggest Maracanã to Conmebol to host Boca Juniors, while evaluating the possibility of appealing the court decision that denied an injunction and favored the Fla-Flu Consortium. According to the publication, the Monday deadline applied only to the change of city; if the game remained in Rio de Janeiro, the club would have until October 10 to finalize the stadium. The publication indicated São Januário as a plan B in case Maracanã was not released and Nilton Santos as the last option. It also stated that Vasco considered the wishes of Conmebol and the Military Police for the match to be held at Maracanã, and saw the possible confirmation of Douglas Ruas as elected to the Government of Rio as a potential ally in the dispute. The report was attributed to O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #Maracanã #BocaJuniors (translated)

Planeta do Futebol reported that 21 clubs had taken legal action against the Provisional Measure regarding betting houses. According to the publication, by the end of the previous week, it was estimated that the participation of more clubs would increase the possibility of Supreme Court Minister Luiz Fux granting an injunction to suspend the measure. Fux had until the next day to analyze the manifestation of the Attorney General's Office. The publication stated that, under the MP signed by President Lula, betting houses would go offline at 11:59 PM on Monday (5). Without an injunction, the clubs in Series B would play on Tuesday and those in Series A on Wednesday without betting brands on their shirts; if granted, the decision could come on Tuesday or Wednesday. In the political sphere, Planeta do Futebol mentioned the assessment that Fux, appointed by Dilma Rousseff, would not necessarily be aligned with the "Lula bench." The publication cited UOL and PVC. #LuizFux #Apostas #STF (translated)

Planet Football reported that the court had denied, on the 5th, Vasco's request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors for the South American tournament, in a match scheduled for October 20. According to the profile, the judge considered technical arguments from the Fla-Flu Consortium that the pitch could not withstand the sequence of games, and there was still room for appeal. The profile added that Vasco had until that day to inform Conmebol if they would play outside the municipality of Rio and until Saturday (10) to indicate another stadium in the city. It also stated that São Januário did not meet the minimum requirement of 30,000 seats. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)

The Football Planet reported, citing ESPN Brazil, that the court denied a request from a Vasco fan to open Maracanã for the semifinal of the South American Cup against Boca Juniors. According to the profile, the judge understood that the action did not demonstrate discrimination, diversion of purpose, or harm to public interest. The profile added that the decision applied only to the fan's process. In another action, filed by Vasco against the Fla-Flu Consortium to try to play at the stadium, the court had ordered a 20-day suspension. The club appealed and requested an urgent decision, but, according to the Football Planet, the request had not yet been analyzed. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)

The Football Planet reported that a judge suspended Vasco's process to play in Maracanã against Boca Juniors. According to the publication, the decision occurred because a Vasco fan opened another action regarding the same match. The fan's request for immediate release of the stadium was denied, and the appeal presented to the Court of Justice had not yet been judged. The judge suspended the club's action until the fan's process is defined to avoid contradictory decisions. The publication cited ge as the source. #Vasco #Maracanã #BocaJuniors (translated)

URGENT! 18 to 19 clubs from Series A and B will join Flamengo in action at the STF against the Provisional Measure that prohibits bets. The clubs will request TODAY to participate as "friends of the Court" in the action at the STF against the MP. Botafogo, Fluminense, Mirassol, and Chapecoense are among the Serie A teams expected to join. São Paulo and Atlético-MG may also participate, but there is no confirmation yet. From Serie B, Fortaleza is not expected to participate, but practically all the others should join. Clubs like Corinthians, Internacional, Vasco, Palmeiras, and Athletico-PR will not enter at this time. Some clubs, like Corinthians and Internacional, are not participating because they are waiting for "FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE GOVERNMENT" and do not want to enter into a "collision course." Palmeiras and Athletico-PR understand that they should not enter. #Futebol #STF #AçãoJudicial (translated)