Search

Reinaldo Azevedo stated that Milei was the model of the far right and that Tarcísio de Freitas had made this clear last year, when, according to Azevedo, he was becoming increasingly extremist. He added that the outcome was already known. https://t.co/DAlbUNwaid #ExtremaDireita #PolíticaBrasil #Milei (translated)

False Nine stated that he had defended Carrascal when the majority were advocating for his sale. Regarding Freitas, he said that, since the player's arrival, he saw potential for him to become a Flamengo idol. He added that the future would tell if that would happen and asked for patience, although he recommended keeping a close eye on him. #Flamengo #Futebol #Carrascal (translated)

Pri wrote that Tarcísio de Freitas raised his tone against Lula and the PT, stating that he had never seen such a lying campaign. According to her, the governor accused the PT of spreading false news to remain in power and said that Flávio Bolsonaro's project aimed to transform Brazil through partnerships and works. https://t.co/lY2hnzscti #Política #Brasil #Eleições2024 (translated)

JH Fonseca stated that Tarcísio de Freitas met with the party's leadership and that the Republicans should announce their support for Flávio Bolsonaro. He also wrote that all moderates were on Flávio's side and referred to the situation as a "class." #Política #TarcísioDeFreitas #FlávioBolsonaro (translated)

Sérgio Santos stated that Renato Freitas, the first black man elected as a federal deputy from Paraná, frequently suffered verbal, physical, and racist violence in the state but remained steadfast. For Santos, Freitas's journey revealed characteristics of Paraná. #RenatoFreitas #racismo #politica (translated)

UpdateCharts stated that Renato Freitas, from the PT party, had been elected federal deputy for Paraná. According to the publication, in 2026, when the state would complete 173 years of history, he would become the first Black man elected federal deputy for Paraná. https://t.co/pezirzqulw #RenatoFreitas #DeputadoFederal #HistóriaDoParaná (translated)

Kriska Carvalho stated that she was shocked by the electoral scenario in Brazil and criticized the result in Rio de Janeiro. According to her, Eduardo Paes was ahead in almost all polls and was seen as the winner in the first round, but Douglas Ruas nearly won at this stage. Carvalho claimed that the result scared her and questioned the support for Ruas, whom she described as a candidate of Cláudio Castro. She accused Castro of stealing and sinking the state and stated that members of the PL in Rio de Janeiro were involved in crimes. She also said that she was already expecting Tarcísio de Freitas to win "here." #Brasil #RioDeJaneiro #Eleições (translated)

The Elections Research published numbers from a Datafolha survey for the government of Ceará in which Elmano de Freitas (PT) appeared with 50% of valid votes, compared to 47% for Ciro Gomes (PSDB). Delegate Huggo (Mission), Vera Lúcia (New) and Zé Batista (PSTU) each had 1%. Compared to the previous numbers presented, Elmano rose by 2 points, Ciro dropped by 2, Huggo and Vera Lúcia remained unchanged, and Zé Batista advanced by 1 point. In total voting intention, Elmano recorded 46% (+3) and Ciro, 44% (stable). Delegate Huggo, Vera Lúcia, and Zé Batista each had 1%; blank, null, or none totaled 4% (-2), and undecided voters made up 3% (-2). The publication stated that the race was focused on the two main candidates and compared the data to a survey from September, in which Ciro was ahead by 44% to 43%. It also noted that the three-point difference between the leaders was not fully covered by the reported margin of error, which was ±2 points, and that formal interpretation depended on the specific margin and methodology of the survey. According to the published technical sheet, the survey was commissioned by O POVO and conducted on October 2 and 3, 2026, with 1,560 interviews, a margin of error of ±2 percentage points, a confidence level of 95%, and registrations with the TSE CE-09234/2026 and BR-06469/2026. #Eleições2026 #Ceará #Datafolha (translated)

Vitor de Lucca shared the numbers from a Datafolha survey in Ceará. In valid votes, Elmano de Freitas (PT) appeared with 50% (+2), Ciro Gomes (PSDB) with 47% (-2), Delegate Huggo (Missão) and Vera Lúcia (Novo) with 1% each (unchanged), and Zé Batista (PSTU) with 1% (+1). In the total votes, Elmano had 46% (+3) and Ciro, 44% (unchanged). Delegate Huggo and Vera Lúcia registered 1% each (unchanged), as well as Zé Batista, who had an increase of 1 point. Blank, null, or none totaled 4% (-2), and the undecided, 3% (-2). #Ceará #Eleições2023 #Datafolha (translated)

The profile RESEARCHES AND ANALYSES ELECTIONS stated that President Lula (PT-SP) had confronted the Military Police of São Paulo, associated with the management of the governor and re-election candidate Tarcísio de Freitas (REP-SP), an ally of Flavio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ). According to the profile, Lula asked his voters to remain in Vila Augusta, a neighborhood in the city of São Paulo, and 30,000 PT protesters gathered in the location in 50 minutes. #Lula #Manifestações #PolíticaBrasil (translated)

Intercept Brasil reported that Pastor Silas Malafaia, president of the Vitória em Cristo Association, mailed campaign materials asking for votes for candidates like Flávio Bolsonaro, Tarcísio de Freitas, and Marco Feliciano. According to the outlet, the sender's address was the same as the headquarters of the association. Experts interviewed by Intercept Brasil said that this type of propaganda could be illegal. #Política #Eleições2024 #LiberdadeReligiosa (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Vasco filed an appeal on Friday (02) at the TJRJ against the decision of the 2nd Civil Court that did not analyze its urgent request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors and suspended the process for 20 days, after a statement from Fla-Flu Serviços in 48 hours. According to Tutinha, Vasco argued that it needs to indicate the stadium to CONMEBOL by 10/05 for the match on 10/20 at 21:30, and that the suspension could make a subsequent decision pointless. The club requested that Judge Rose Marie Pimentel Martins, from the 5th Chamber of Public Law, grant the request directly for Maracanã to be made available. As an alternative, it requested the end of the suspension and that the first-instance judge analyze the preliminary injunction without waiting for the appeal related to the popular action. Tutinha reported that Vasco also contested the technical criteria used to deny the stadium and claimed a contradiction in the concessionaire's position on the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Vasco, Flamengo, and Fluminense. The club stated that the restrictions should be applied in a non-discriminatory manner and cited ten official matches held at Maracanã in May 2026, nine of them between the 9th and 30th, including games on consecutive days: Fluminense x Bolívar on 05/19, and Flamengo x Estudiantes on 05/20; Flamengo x Cusco on 05/26, and Fluminense x Deportivo La Guaira on 05/27. According to Tutinha, Vasco also mentioned the indication of Maracanã by PMERJ as the most suitable option for security planning. Among the requests, it included non-discriminatory commercial and operational conditions, a maximum ticket load according to the authorized capacity, and a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Federal Deputy Renato Freitas stated that, in his assessment, there were two ways to lose an election: to believe that he would be defeated or to believe that he would win. He said he was in the fight and asked for each person's support to be converted into votes at the polls. Freitas published the number 1333. https://t.co/8NjO7iPGrS #Eleições2023 #VoteConsciente #Democracia (translated)

🚨 VASCO CONTESTS TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF FLA-FLU, POINTS OUT VIOLATION OF CONCESSION RULES AND CITES DECISION FROM TJRJ IN ACTION FOR MARACANÃ Vasco filed an obligation lawsuit on Wednesday (1st) with a request for urgent protective measures to try to secure the Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. In the action, the club directly questions the technical criteria used by Fla-Flu to deny the stadium, points out unequal treatment, supports violations of concession rules, and also explores a contradiction involving the Memorandum of Understanding. 📌 WHAT FLA-FLU ALLEGED In response to Vasco, the concessionaire pointed to the accumulated wear of the lawn, the climatic conditions of July and August, and the need to preserve the intervals designated for field maintenance. For 10/20, Fla-Flu specifically mentioned games of Fluminense on 10/18 and Flamengo on 10/22. With Vasco x Boca between these matches, there would be three games in five days. According to the concessionaire, this sequence would prevent procedures such as helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and repair of damage to the lawn. 📌 VASCO QUESTIONS THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION The first counterpoint is the lawn itself. Vasco highlights that, three days after the denial, it was announced that the existing field would be removed and new Bermuda Celebration rolls would be placed, with the return of football scheduled for 10/08. Vasco x Boca will be on 10/20. The club's thesis is that it would not be possible to use the accumulated wear of the old lawn as justification for a match that will take place 12 days after the return of football to the renewed field. 📌 GREENLEAF DOCUMENT IS USED BY VASCO Vasco also retrieves the technical planning prepared by Greenleaf, the company responsible for lawn maintenance, in August. According to the action, the document shows that the same procedures cited by Fla-Flu to deny Vasco x Boca have already been carried out in a concentrated manner between matches. The petition states that helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and damage repair have even been grouped in a single day after a match, even in a winter scenario and lawn wear. The question posed by Vasco is direct: if this work could be done in August to accommodate the sequence of games from Flamengo and Fluminense, why couldn't it be repeated in October, after the complete lawn replacement? 📌 INTERVAL BETWEEN GAMES Vasco also contests the argument of three games in five days by comparing the situation with the recent calendar of the Maracanã. The action argues that sequences with reduced intervals for Flamengo and Fluminense matches have already been admitted. For Vasco, if the necessary interval for lawn recovery is decisive for denying a match, that criterion must be applied equally to all clubs. 📌 SHOWS AND OTHER EVENTS The action also points out that the Maracanã hosts shows, religious gatherings, and events from other sports, including the installation of structures and occupancy of the field area. Vasco questions how the administration can reconcile these events with lawn preservation, yet considers it technically unfeasible to host a semifinal of CONMEBOL. According to the data presented in the action, at least seven extraordinary events unrelated to official football were held between 2025 and 09/30/2026. 📌 CONCESSION NOTICE Vasco cites item 3.4 of the Terms of Reference, which gives priority to football events from the official calendars of FIFA, CONMEBOL, CBF, and FERJ over other events. Vasco x Boca is an official semifinal of CONMEBOL. The action argues that there would be an "inversion of this priority" by accommodating shows and other events and denying the stadium for a match that, under the concession rules cited by the club, should have priority. The petition mentions "distortion of the concessionaire's obligations" and "violation of the equal treatment required by the Concession Notice." 📌 UNEQUAL TREATMENT Vasco summarizes its challenge in four points: • the lawn replacement would change the premise of accumulated wear; • Greenleaf's own planning would demonstrate that maintenance could be carried out between matches; • the calendar would show reduced intervals that have already been admitted for Flamengo and Fluminense; • other events are reconciled with the necessary care for field preservation. As a result, Vasco asserts that restrictions are being applied selectively. The action further cites clause 13.2 of the Concession Contract, which prohibits favoritism and unjustifiably different, discriminatory treatment, or "without technical criteria" that results in restricted access to the Complex. 📌 THE CONTRADICTION POINTED OUT BY VASCO Fla-Flu claims not to recognize the validity of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025. At the same time, according to Vasco, it uses the document itself—especially the provision for four matches conditioned on availability and operational conditions—to justify the denial. Vasco points out contradictory behavior and invokes the principle of good faith. 📌 PREVIOUS DECISION OF TJRJ The action also cites the Instrument Appeal No. 3023517-70.2026.8.19.0000. On that occasion, Justice Alexandre Freitas Câmara analyzed the discussion regarding the absence of Fla-Flu's signature on the Memorandum. The magistrate stated that Flamengo and Fluminense, members of the concessionaire, had signed the document and pointed out that disregarding it later could represent contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. 📌 RECOMMENDATION FROM BEPE The issue of public safety also appears as an argument for the use of the Maracanã. According to the action, BEPE (Specialized Battalion for Policing in Stadiums) recommended holding the match at the Maracanã due to the magnitude of the confrontation and the expected public turnout. Vasco uses this recommendation to argue that the Maracanã is not just a preference of the club. The petition points to the stadium as the option that best meets capacity, location, structure, security, and operational conditions to host the match against Boca. 📌 SÃO JANUÁRIO IS NOT AN OPTION Vasco also differentiates the situation from the previous process involving Vasco x Vitória, when it did not obtain a preliminary injunction to use the Maracanã. This time, according to the action, São Januário cannot host the semifinal. The South American Manual requires a minimum capacity of 30,000 spectators starting from the semifinals, while the petition indicates São Januário has approximately 21,880 seats. Vasco acknowledges the Nilton Santos Stadium as an alternative but argues that having another stadium does not resolve the issue brought to Justice: is there legitimate technical and contractual basis for Fla-Flu to deny Maracanã? 📌 WHAT VASCO SEEKS Vasco is seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Fla-Flu to make the Maracanã available for Vasco x Boca on 10/20 at 9:30 PM. The request includes the maximum ticket allocation corresponding to the authorized capacity, the use of necessary facilities for organizing the match, the implementation of a mosaic, and temporary installation of banners in the same manner allowed for the clubs that are members of the concessionaire. In case of non-compliance, Vasco requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million. Vasco must inform CONMEBOL by October 5 where it will hold the return match of the semifinal. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

The master sponsorship contract of Flamengo is on 'stand-by'. The parties decided to wait until there is a definition regarding the Provisional Measure that prohibited bets, which will still be analyzed by Congress. Flamengo has already received the payment for 2026. Regarding the payment for 2027 (BRL 268.5 million), the club is counting on an incoming BRL 120 MILLION in JANUARY. Some clubs are awaiting payment from Flamengo in January, such as West Ham (for Paquetá), Atlético de Madrid (Samuel Lino), Milan (Emerson Royal), and Al Sadd (Plata). In July, there are payments to teams such as River Plate (Joaquín Freitas) and Antwerp (Anthony Valencia). The Rubro-Negro is counting on the sponsor's funds for these commitments. #Flamengo #Patrocínio #Futebol (translated)

People, Haddad is destroying Tarcísio de Freitas in the debate. Tarcísio is lost. In São Paulo, there is everything missing: water, security, health, education. The state of São Paulo is a complete chaos. #SãoPaulo #Debate #Política (translated)

🚨 Não é só Paquetá: Flamengo tem mais 5 jogadores com parcelas pendentes que contavam com dinheiro da patrocinadora máster (bet). Além dos compromissos pela compra de Paquetá, de R$ 315 milhões, o Fla contava com parcelas do patrocinador máster para pagar em 2027 e 2028 por Plata, Emerson Royal, Samuel Lino, Joaquín Freitas e Anthony Valencia. Cerca de R$ 40 MILHÕES POR ANO da patrocinadora seriam usados para isso. Na avaliação do clube, o dinheiro ainda daria para buscar MAIS REFORÇOS. A verba da empresa referente a 2026, inclusive, foi antecipada para isso. O argumento do clube é que o normal seria se programar contando com receitas de contratos que, até então, eram legais. O contrato prevê R$ 268 milhões por ano. A empresa ainda não notificou o Flamengo sobre uma possível rescisão, mas admite preocupação e afirmou que tomará "decisões no momento apropriado". 🗞️ @OGlobo_Esportes | @diogodantas 📸 Gilvan de Souza/CRF #Flamengo #FutebolBrasileiro #MercadoDaBola

🚨 GRAVE: Após os ataques contra Nossa Senhora Aparecida, volta a viralizar o vídeo de Tarcísio de Freitas, aliado de Flávio Bolsonaro, fazendo campanha para deputado que atacou católicos ao xingar um arcebispo da CNBB e o Papa de “VAGABUNDOS”. FLÁVIO INIMIGO DOS CATÓLICOS UNIDOS POR APARECIDA #Católicos #GrupoCatólico #PolíticaBrasileira