The grandchildren of those exiled during Franco's regime will not be able to vote, while the grandchildren of the Franco regime will be able to vote. President Pedro Sánchez warned the Supreme Court this Sunday that it would be "unconstitutional" to prevent 400,000 "grandchildren of exiles" from voting in the general elections on November 29. #PSOE #LeyDeMemoriaDemocrática #VotoNacionalizados (translated)
Pedro Sánchez has stated that it would be unconstitutional to prevent 400,000 naturalized citizens from voting due to the 'grandchildren's law', while the Supreme Court deliberates on their registration in the electoral roll. #PSOE #LeyDeMemoriaDemocrática #VotoNacionalizados (translated)

It is an unconstitutional reform that alters the relationship between votes and electoral results. A minority becomes a large parliamentary majority due to the disproportionate benefit it receives," says Ouidad Bakkali, a deputy of the Democratic Party (PD), who was present at the vote, to elDiario.es. #ReformaElectoral #GiorgiaMeloni #PolíticaItalia (translated)
The controversial electoral reform promoted by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, which grants additional seats to the coalition that exceeds 42% of the votes, has sparked criticism for its potential unconstitutionality and for altering the balance of power in Parliament, generating tensions with the center-left opposition amidst expectations of early elections. #ReformaElectoral #GiorgiaMeloni #PolíticaItalia (translated)

In the same vein, the spokesperson for the Green and Left Alliance (AVS), Angelo Bonelli, asserted that the Prime Minister herself is aware that the text is unconstitutional. #GiorgiaMeloni #ReformaElectoral #Italia (translated)
Similarly, the leader of the PD and main figure of the opposition, Elly Schlein, labeled the reform as "wrong and unconstitutional" and criticized the Government for intending to "change the rules of the game and the laws with the game already underway." #GiorgiaMeloni #ReformaElectoral #Italia (translated)
Lupe Sánchez referred to judgment 28/2026 of the Constitutional Court, dated March 25, 2026, to question the constitutionality of the Maricarmen decrees. As she summarized, the court held that a decree-law could not be approved simply to prevent the entry into force of provisions included in a law approved by the regional parliament. She added that the government's disagreement with the outcome of a parliamentary vote did not constitute a situation of extraordinary and urgent necessity. https://t.co/Std8Kso5P1 #Inconstitucionalidad #TribunalConstitucional #Derecho (translated)
"Pedro Sánchez maintained that it was unconstitutional. He changed it for seven votes to become president of the Government. It's a surrender." #Amnistía #Puigdemont #PedroSánchez (translated)
"Pedro Sánchez maintained that it was unconstitutional. He changed it for seven votes to be president of the Government. It is a surrender." #PedroSánchez #Elecciones2026 #PSOE (translated)
Milei's repentants stated that the Federal Court had declared unconstitutional Milei's decree that halted the University Financing Law and that this was the ninth ruling that forced the Government to pay the teachers. They added that if a Peronist had ignored nine judicial rulings, they would have already been dismissed. https://t.co/D28gzZlcK2 #Justicia #LeyDeFinanciamiento #Educación (translated)
Gustavo Petro criticized the Council of State for revoking the minimum vital salary and stated that the decision, which he attributed to a magistrate or the full chamber, would reduce internal consumption and could lead Colombia to an economic crisis and violence. He accused the court of acting like an office of the Casa de Nariño and asserted that the measure jeopardized the middle class and could cause widespread poverty and bankruptcies. Petro said that the increase in the minimum wage during his government had reduced poverty and contributed to decreasing thefts, domestic violence, and extortion. He also claimed that the decision disregarded the 1991 Constitution and linked the Council of State with Abelardo, whom he described as a tyrant. The president called on workers from different sectors to mobilize and asked millions of people to take to the streets to demand a vital salary, promote a general strike, and support the people's constituent power. He accused his opponents of declaring war on workers and ended with a call for a free Colombia. https://t.co/EMvqmYeWO2 #SalarioMínimo #Colombia #DerechosLaborales (translated)
The author recommended reading a critique by Alfredo Romero, president of the Penal Forum, regarding the arbitrariness he attributed to Delcy Rodríguez in relation to the Hate Law. He described the critique as "very fair" and described Romero as always well-informed; he also characterized Rodríguez as dictatorial and the law as illegal and unconstitutional. #LibertadDeExpresión #DerechosHumanos #VenezuelanPolitics #VE (translated)
God pointed out that Pedro Sánchez had reproached that many things were said about the amnesty law, including the claim that it was unconstitutional. He added that this position had been held by the Government itself and that it was later changed by 7 votes. #Amnistía #PedroSánchez #Política (translated)
Jesús Villegas announced an article from Confilegal with Carlos Berbell in which he addressed what he termed as a legal fraud related to the "Mari Carmen" decrees. He framed the text within the supposed unconstitutionality of those decrees and described the situation as "the danger of a wounded animal," linking it to Pedro Sánchez. https://t.co/Vu7sHnJezi #Política #Derecho #España (translated)
"Chega has already done everything it could do. We have already put forward the project, already guaranteed it provisionally, and already indicated the names. Now the swearing-in has to take place. If Aguiar Branco refuses to do it, he is committing an unconstitutional act, something clearly against the Constitution. But worse than that, he is showing that he is a president of the Assembly equally tied to interests, like Ferro Rodrigues and Augusto Santos Silva. And that is wrong. It is inconceivable to accept that an inquiry committee could be halted because two are ongoing." André Ventura insists that Aguiar Branco is tied to the interests of the PSD and the PS. #ParlamentoEuropeu #OrçamentoEuropeu #AçõesGovernamentais (translated)
TeAtualizei stated that the requirement of 54 votes from senators for the impeachment of a Supreme Federal Court minister would have been an unconstitutional interference by Gilmar Mendes, determined in a preliminary injunction in an ADPF. According to the author, this requirement was not part of the Constitution or the law, and the Senate could review it before taking other measures. #Impeachment #SupremoTribunalFederal #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)
PSOE and Sumar ignore the lawyers and sneak in the Education Law the legalization of the 'grandchildren's law'. The jurists warned in a report that it is unconstitutional to sneak in an 'intrusive amendment' into a law. https://t.co/LGSRuewYli #LeyDeEducación #PSOE #Derecho #ES (translated)
A monarchical institution like the Supreme Court, made up of only 3 people, reverses what millions achieved in the streets on August 6. In a scandalous ruling, it upholds article 154 of DNU 70/23 which repeals the Land Law, a measure that had been declared unconstitutional following a request from veterans of the Malvinas. It seems that the courtiers did not receive the information that the admirer of Thatcher has now become a "Malvinero." A farce from those who pillage and hand over everything. Just as we did against the 2x1 in favor of the genocides, we must defeat them in the streets. #Justicia #DerechosHumanos #Malvinas (translated)
The thing with the Land Law is this: In December 2023, the Government signed DNU 70/23, which, among many other things, repealed the Land Law. Like many of the chapters of that DNU, the article repealing the Land Law was judicialized: The Center of Ex-Combatants of La Plata filed an amparo claiming it was unconstitutional. In January 2024, federal judge Ernesto Krepak issued a precautionary measure suspending that article until the issue of constitutionality was resolved. Then, the Federal Court of La Plata declared the article unconstitutional and told the Government that if they wanted to repeal the Land Law, they would have to go through Congress. They could not do it by DNU. The Government then presented to Congress the Law of Inviolability of Private Property with a chapter to repeal the most restrictive points of the Land Law. What happened is what we all know: mass mobilization in the streets, expressions from popular artists and football players, the Malvinas flag at the World Cup, and all the pressure that caused the ruling party to lose votes and have to withdraw the chapter. Now what the Supreme Court of Justice (made up of 3 people) has done is overturn the ruling of the Federal Court of La Plata and restore the validity of the chapter of DNU 70/23 that repealed the Land Law. They were careful not to comment on the substantive issue because they have been procrastinating on resolving the constitutionality of the entire DNU for almost three years. The rationale is that the Center of Ex-Combatants of La Plata does not have procedural standing to file an amparo against the decree. They let time pass to let the dust settle and achieved, with a requested ruling, what they could not do democratically, which is to sell Argentine lands to foreigners. #LeyDeTierras #DerechosHumanos #Argentina (translated)
Ele está assistindo o Alexandre de Moraes perseguir e censurar pessoas por meio de ilegalidades e inconstitucionalidades há 7 anos, mas agora está indignado com o Mendonça. Na eleição passada proibiram associar o nome de Lula a Maduro e Ortega e a galera da Jovem Pan foi proibida de chamar Lula de corrupto e “descondenado”, coisas que são pura verdade. É de cair o cool da bunda essa desfaçatez #Censura #Política #Justiça