Search

DAZN Spain noted that Marc Márquez positively evaluated his weekend in Mandalika and said that on Thursday he would have accepted finishing with no difference compared to Martín and three points fewer than Bezzecchi. https://t.co/WiTJKAnzAq #MotoGP #IndonesianGP #MarcMárquez (translated)

DAZN Spain reported that Marc Márquez had assessed the risks and benefits during the race. The rider said he had reached the limit and that he tried to maximize his performance, waiting for Acosta and Ogura to make a mistake while overtaking. https://t.co/B5rHLsFjVs #MotoGP #MarcMárquez #Motorsport (translated)

DAZN Spain pointed out that Marc Márquez had expressed his fatigue on the podium in Mandalika and described it as "inhuman" to be there. According to the outlet, the rider said that the situation was good for the photo but did not benefit the performance the next day, and that everyone was looking out for their own interests. https://t.co/QbNkemy9ei #MotoGP #MarcMarquez #Deporte (translated)

Alessio Piana described the incident at the start as a racing accident. He challenged the idea that Marquez had tried to squeeze in at all costs, stating that he was forced to widen due to Di Giannantonio's presence on the inside, who had braked late. #MotoGP #Motociclismo #Sport (translated)

“When Terrorism Becomes “Resistance”: What the Statistics Actually Show Do most Muslims oppose Islamist terrorism? The available evidence does not support either a simple “yes” or “no.” It shows a more complicated pattern: many Muslims reject attacks on civilians, while attitudes toward political violence can change substantially depending on the conflict, the perpetrators and the victims. A 2013 Pew Research Center survey found that 89% of Pakistani Muslims, 81% of Indonesian Muslims and 77% of Tunisian Muslims said suicide bombing and violence against civilians could never be justified in defence of Islam. But the figure was only 38% in the Palestinian territories; 62% said such violence could sometimes or often be justified (Pew Research Center, 2013). Jordan provides another revealing example. After al-Qaeda’s 2005 hotel bombings in Amman, support for Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda as a legitimate resistance organisation fell from 67% to 20%, while those calling it a terrorist organisation rose from 10.6% to 48.9% (Jamestown Foundation, 2005). The fact that attacks on Muslim civilians dramatically changed attitudes suggests that perceptions of political violence can depend partly on who is being targeted. More recently, an Arab Center survey across 16 Arab countries found that 67% considered Hamas’s October 7 operation a legitimate resistance operation, while another 19% considered it flawed but legitimate (Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies, 2024). These figures cannot, however, be equated directly with support for terrorism: respondents were asked about legitimacy and Hamas, not specifically whether they supported terrorism or attacks on civilians. The evidence therefore does not establish that most Muslims support terrorism. It does show something more precise and important: opposition to Islamist violence is not necessarily consistent across circumstances. Some people who reject terrorism in principle may regard violence as legitimate when it is framed as resistance against a perceived enemy. The statistics cited by FrontPage Magazine therefore raise a legitimate question(Greenfield, 2026)” - ChatGPT

🇪🇺🇮🇩 FIGHT EU PALM-OIL POPULISM — FIGHT DEFORESTATION, NOT INDONESIA! 🌴 Europe needs serious environmental policy, not ideological trade barriers that punish Indonesian farmers, workers and rural communities. Palm oil itself is not the enemy. Deforestation is the enemy. Illegal https://t.co/XYpAStVukq #StopDeforestation #PalmOilDebate #EcoJustice #EU #ID