Search

Pedro Emanuel stated that the team would have to change their attitude to face Boca Juniors in Argentina, in a different competition and in the first of two matches. He mentioned that the opponent had also made changes to their team the day before and had not won, having been close to losing, but he highlighted Boca's quality and their ambition to be Argentine champions. The coach acknowledged that his team had not played well and would need to do more to be competitive and fight for the result. However, he added that the team could have a less successful performance and that he expected to reach a high level on Tuesday, thanks to physical, technical, tactical, and mental preparation. #Futebol #Competições #BocaJuniors (translated)

The Cruzmaltina Arena reported, based on Venê Casagrande, that Brenner had been listed for the match against Boca Juniors in the semifinals of the Copa Sul-Americana. The photo was credited to Matheus Lima, from Vasco. https://t.co/AACqdV7blc #CopaSulAmericana #BocaJuniors #Futebol (translated)

Planeta do Futebol reported that, after an unfavorable court decision, the Fla-Flu Consortium asked the court to reject a new appeal from Vasco regarding ticket sales for the match against Boca Juniors. The concessionaire stated that the club should assume the risks of having sold tickets while the injunction could still be suspended. The Consortium argued that the appeal had lost its object due to the proximity of the deadline and that it repeated already rejected arguments. It advocated for the match to be held at Nilton Santos Stadium and stated that there would still be time to reorganize the event. According to the publication, Vasco urgently requested reconsideration of the suspension and claimed that it had begun sales for Maracanã after receiving court authorization. The club argued that the capacity of Nilton Santos, which is 44,661 people, was less than the 46,014 tickets sold, which would require cancellations and refunds. It also pointed out the need to accommodate 4,000 visiting fans and maintain separation areas between the supporters. The appeal from Vasco and the statement from the Fla-Flu Consortium were awaiting analysis from Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, reported Planeta do Futebol, based on ESPN Brazil. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that the Vasco fans were already in the mood for the semifinal of the South American Cup against Boca Juniors at São Januário, and they were singing that Tuesday would be "war." https://t.co/J4uysrkIZA #Vasco #SulAmericana #Futebol (translated)

The Football Planet reported that Vasco would appeal the court decision that overturned the injunction requiring the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for the match against Boca Juniors. According to the publication, the club would not publicly comment and would try to regain the stadium through behind-the-scenes negotiations. This information was attributed to ESPN Brazil and Pedro Ivo Almeida. #Vasco #Maracanã #FlaFlu (translated)

Braga's central criticized the uncertainty regarding the venue for Vasco x Boca Juniors. He wrote that Vasco had been trying for weeks to obtain permission from the courts to play at Maracanã, got the approval the day before, and sold 45 thousand tickets in advance. According to the author, the courts suspended the decision, leaving the match without a defined location once again. #Vasco #Libertadores #Futebol (translated)

The Planet of Football reported that a decision by Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães suspended the injunction that required the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. According to the publication, the legal dispute continued. The judge reportedly understood that Marco Antônio Ibrahim could not alone review the decision of the rapporteur Alexandre de Carvalho Mesquita and that the appeal should be analyzed by the rapporteur himself or by a panel. She also reportedly pointed out the risk of having three rival fan bases in the same area, as Flamengo vs. Botafogo, for basketball, would be held that evening at Maracanãzinho. According to the report, Suely cited a report from BEPE that deemed Nilton Santos suitable to host the match and stated that the police's preference for Maracanã did not make its use indispensable for safety. The decision, the publication added, did not determine whether Vasco had the right to the stadium nor whether the consortium's refusal was legitimate. The writ of security would be forwarded to rapporteur Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, and the decision would be submitted to the Special Body of TJ-RJ. The publication attributed the information to the newspaper O Globo. #Maracanã #Vasco #Justiça (translated)

The news profile newscolina reported that Bruno Duarte would be rested against Remo but would travel normally to Argentina, where he would face Boca Juniors. The publication attributed the information to Venê Casagrande. https://t.co/6D5bEBkGzi #Futebol #BrunoDuarte #BocaJuniors (translated)

Pedrosa's channel stated that Vasco was very close to reaching 70 thousand club members and had already issued around 45 thousand tickets for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors at Maracanã. The author claimed that the stadium would be crowded. #CanaldoPedrosa https://t.co/W379jrk157 #Vasco #CopaSulAmericana #Sociotorcedor (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that Vasco da Gama filed a motion with the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) to defend the decision that determined the availability of Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the publication, the document was filed on Saturday (the 10th) and requested that the attempt by the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision through a writ of security be rejected. The publication reported that the club argued that the court decision took into account statements from public security agencies and the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro. According to Vasco, the Military Police pointed to Maracanã as the preferred alternative, considering the infrastructure, urban mobility, fan organization, and access control. The club also questioned, according to the publication, the criteria used by the concessionaire to deny the stadium and argued that the requirements for preserving the pitch should be applied objectively and equally. The defense also stated that Conmebol had already announced Maracanã as the venue and that ticket sales were underway. By the morning of October 10, Vasco reported having sold 11,446 tickets and handed over 4,000 tickets to Boca Juniors for the visiting fans. Attention, Vasco fans! the club added that it warned of possible damages to the organization of the semifinal, to the supporters, and to the security planning if the decision were suspended. Vasco requested that the concessionaire's injunction be denied and that the writ of security be rejected, maintaining the decision that secured the stadium. According to the publication, the legal dispute was still ongoing. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

The Planeta do Futebol profile reported that the Fla-Flu Consortium appealed to the president of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro to try to reverse the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã. According to the profile, the consortium filed a writ of security and requested an urgent measure while the appeal was being analyzed. The consortium stated it had authorized six requests from Vasco since the start of the concession, including classics against Flamengo and Fluminense. The authorization for the match with Boca Juniors would remain valid, unless the court accepted the request, the profile added, citing O Globo Esportes and Diogo Dantas. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Futebol (translated)

Venê Casagrande stated that Vasco had won a legal dispute with the management of Maracanã, formed by Flamengo and Fluminense, and that they would play at the stadium. He also said that Conmebol had already announced Maracanã as the venue for the match against Boca Juniors. https://t.co/kAee8EPspv #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

The Sócio Gigante profile announced that ticket sales for Vasco da Gama vs Boca Juniors at Maracanã, for the CONMEBOL Sudamericana, would start on 09/10. According to the publication, members could purchase starting at 10 PM on 09/10, and sales to the general public would begin on 12/10 at 10 AM. The profile indicated different sales channels for members, statutory members, and the general public, as well as free admission. https://t.co/JTOY6LDB3o #SejaUmGigante #VascoDaGama #VascoDaGama #Copa #Sudamericana (translated)

Giant Partner reported that soon information would be released about the ticket sale for Vasco x Boca Juniors, for the CONMEBOL Sudamericana. The author advised fans to check if their facial registration was regularized and updated and to follow the official channels for new instructions. #SejaUmGigante #VascoDaGama #VascoDaGama #Sudamericana #Ingressos (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the TJRJ, ordered the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors to be held at Maracanã and took into account the history of conflicts between Vasco and the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. Tutinha stated that the magistrate pointed out that the club had already sought justice to use the stadium and that the concessionaire had repeated justifications related to the condition of the pitch, which could indicate a "personal issue" between the parties. According to Tutinha, Ibrahim also considered a Memorandum of Understanding between Vasco and the concessionaire. The club argued that the document guaranteed it four matches per season at Maracanã, excluding classics against Flamengo and Fluminense, and that any refusals should be based on objective technical and operational criteria. Tutinha added that Vasco pointed out a contradiction in how the concessionaire invoked the memorandum to restrict access but contested its binding force when it provided rights to the club. Ibrahim considered the document in his reasoning but did not make a definitive decision on the enforceability of all clauses. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

The Vasco da Gama Rowing Club announced that the match against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20, would be held at Maracanã after the Justice recognized the club's right. The institution thanked the Public Ministry, the Court of Justice, the CBF, and the Government of the State of Rio de Janeiro for their support in the process. According to the club, the solution was orchestrated by Alan Belaciano, president of the General Assembly of Vasco, alongside the legal teams of Vasco SAF and the Vasco da Gama Rowing Club. The institution stated that the case marked the resumption of joint work between the legal areas, in defense of the interests of Vasco. #VascoDaGama #Vasco #Futebol #RioDeJaneiro (translated)

Planeta do Futebol reported that the Justice of Rio de Janeiro had accepted, on that day, an appeal from Vasco and ordered the Fla-Flu Consortium to release Maracanã for the semifinal of the South American Cup against Boca Juniors. According to the profile, the appellate judge considered public safety and the protection of fans to be more relevant than the issues regarding the pitch claimed by the consortium. The publication stated that the decision took into account favorable expressions from the Public Ministry and the Military Police, a memorandum between the parties regarding the use of the stadium by Vasco, and the deadline set by Conmebol, which would expire the following day. #Vasco #Maracanã #SulAmericana (translated)