Search

The author of the entry claimed that Donald Tusk suffered a severe defeat in Krakow, and that the Civic Coalition lost the election despite the support of the entire government, including through public funds during the campaign. He also called for transferring the wave of opposition from Krakow to all of Poland and referred to his opponents as cheaters. https://t.co/o1FUHMOlEI #Polska #wybory #Tusk #PL (translated)

Artificial intelligence is dramatically changing the world of online scams, which cost victims $442 billion last year, taking control of this criminal sector and allowing criminals to carry out various types of fraud, from fake investments to identity theft, more quickly and cheaply. #spletneprevare #umetnainteligenca #kriminal (translated)

Last year, Bugatti Rimac produced 134 cars with an average price of 5.5 million euros, and the company's value is estimated at around two billion euros after the latest transaction – but Mate Rimac simultaneously declares that electric cars are "yesterday's news" and that he sees the future elsewhere. #MateRimac #avtomobilizem #električniavtomobili (translated)

Lani, the most prestigious Nobel Prize was awarded to the leader of the Venezuelan opposition, Maria Corina Machado, but she later handed it over to the President of the United States, Donald Trump, who believed he should have received the award himself. #NobelovaNagrada #Mir #Venezuela (translated)

The author noted that Microsoft's data center in New Jersey had been illegally releasing nitrogen oxides into the atmosphere for almost a year, for which the company received a fine of one million US dollars. He added that Microsoft's EBITDA last year amounted to 194 billion US dollars. https://t.co/UjJD2bpeE6 #Microsoft #okolje #kazni #US (translated)

Lani, the most prestigious Nobel Prize was awarded to the leader of the Venezuelan opposition, Maria Corina Machado, who later handed it over to the President of the United States, Donald Trump, who was convinced that he should have received the award. #NobelovaNagrada #Mir #Kultura (translated)

Last year, Russia remained the second largest oil producer, but now it imports fuel mainly from South Korea, while Ukraine is preparing for a difficult winter amid attacks on infrastructure that leave Kyiv without electricity for up to 16 hours a day. #Ukrajina #Kijev #zima (translated)

Régis de Castelnau wrote that the Socialist Party's primary and social democracy gave him a certain pleasure, notably because he believed that Ségolène Royal was methodically going after Raphaël Glucksmann. He accused the latter of having been placed at the head of the socialist list for the European elections in 2018 on orders from the CIA, which he presented as his employer, and claimed that this decision aimed to make him Emmanuel Macron's successor. He also described Macron's rise to the presidency as a coup d'état organized with the help of the "Attali gang." De Castelnau deemed Glucksmann incompetent and believed that the conditions of 2017 were no longer in place to reproduce the same scenario. He predicted that PS officials would manipulate the primary to make Glucksmann win, while asserting that he would not go far. He also accused Glucksmann of making the Georgian people suffer. #Politique #PartiSocialiste #SocialDémocratie (translated)

In Ukraine, in the first eight months of 2026, according to United Nations data, more than 15,000 civilians have been killed or injured, which represents a 55% increase compared to the same period last year, while Russian attacks on civilian targets and energy infrastructure are significantly escalating. #Ukrajina #človekovepravice #vojna (translated)

Rok Ravnikar accused RTV Slovenia of not fulfilling its mission of balanced reporting and presenting different views. He wrote that more than which side it supports, he is concerned about the loss of space for the exchange of opinions and confrontation in a democratic republic. He compared two television debates. Last November, during the referendum on euthanasia, he participated in a debate where, according to him, the time was evenly divided between supporters and opponents. There were supposed to be considerably more opponents, so each was given about 45 seconds, while supporters had two minutes each. In a debate about one of the four current referendums, they announced that each participant would get 40 seconds. Ravnikar asked why RTV Slovenia changed the criteria for time distribution, as the same time for each side and the same time for each speaker with a different number of participants would mean a different ratio between the sides. He added that as an active citizen, he expects a response from the journalistic, media, and legal professions. In this context, he cited the stance of Levitsky and Ziblatt from the book *How Democracies Die?*, that changing the rules to one's own benefit and to the detriment of opponents is characteristic of authoritarian regimes. #mediji #demokracija #poročašnje (translated)

More than 2000 words blame how the public @rtvslo does not fulfill its mission of balanced reporting and presenting different views. You cannot make a bigger anti-ad. And it is the least important which side I support - what worries and saddens me the most is that as a democratic republic we are losing the space for exchange and confrontation. Why do you think of the "others" as so stupid? When did the attitude towards the "others" change so much? Yes, I ask you, who prepare the program. I understand, you have your own agenda and your own views, but in a democratic community mutual respect is a fundamental value. Twenty years ago, I worked as a PR person in politics. Even then, we knew who belonged where and which uncle from the background had more influence. But I felt that those of us on the ground, who were in direct contact – journalists, editors, and PR people – respected each other on a professional level. When I participated in a debate last November about the referendum on euthanasia, the time was evenly divided between the "FOR" side and the "AGAINST" side. There were significantly more opponents at that time, so each of us got, if I remember correctly, 45 seconds. Most barely managed to present one thought. On the other side, the supporters had two minutes. There were also some pretty bizarre embarrassments, as some could not come up with enough arguments for a two-minute speech. Last night, I heard an introductory announcement at a debate about one of the four current referendums that each speaker would get 40 seconds. Seriously? So back then equal time for both sides, now equal time for each speaker. These are different criteria, which with a different number of participants also mean a different distribution of time between both sides. Why did you change the criterion? I am just an active citizen, I expect that the journalistic, media, and legal professions will provide their criticism and assessment. "Changing the rules to your advantage and adjusting the conditions to the detriment of opponents is one of the basic characteristics of authoritarian powers." (Levitsky & Ziblatt: How democracies die?) #demokracija #mediji #poročanje (translated)

The opposition is scaring that NGOs will be left without money. Instead of talking about helping children with rare diseases, the discussion revolves around 12 million euros, which is only 1.6% of 723 million euros in public funds that NGOs received last year! What about the children whose health insurance does not cover treatment? Who will take care of them? This must remain the essence of the discussion! #NevladneOrganizacije #Otrok #Pomoč (translated)

Samo lani je bilo zaradi vere ubitih več kot 4800 kristjanov. V Iranu je zločinski teokratski režim samo letos brutalno umoril več deset tisoč svojih državljanov. Skupnosti v Nigeriji se že več kot desetletje soočajo z množičnimi poboji, ugrabitvami, uničevanjem vasi in https://t.co/ucUxI8sJCH #Kristjani #Nigerija #IranskiRežim #SI #IR #NG