Search

Joaquin Teixeira Eterno wrote that Podpah sociologists declared support for Lula and stated, in an ironic tone, that the bloggers were known for the intelligence of the questions asked on the podcast. He also attributed the expression "200% pure feces" to a reader. https://t.co/ntW83AkXLA #Lula #Podpah #Política (translated)

It will be paid with the December pension and will cover more than two million pensioners. On the same day, the Prime Minister, Luís Montenegro, stated - in a declaration to the country, without the opportunity for questions, from the official residence in São Bento, Lisbon - that the initiative was part of a set of measures approved by the government to "strengthen the response" to the crisis caused by the rising cost of living. #SegurançaSocial #Pensões #Economia (translated)

What does a place leave in us after we leave it? An image? A story? A building? A memory? ... What captures your gaze? The feminine trait? The strength of nature? The simple flight of butterflies? ... It is from these questions that I work on the paper filigree. I am Patrícia H., a Portuguese visual artist. I transform paper, time, and technique into art about memory, places, and identity. First publication in WRLD. ❤️ Let's see what conversations arise from here. #darticha #paperart #portugal (translated)

Fernanda Salles stated that Lula made false promises and that the promise of picanha for the poor would not have been the first nor would it be the last. She also said that he boasted about inventing numbers in speeches to foreigners and mentioned a statement in which Lula allegedly admitted that he did not have sources for the numbers presented if questioned. https://t.co/IRXzmPVAzC #Lula #Política #Economia (translated)

Sam Pancher stated that a decision forced the inclusion of a candidate from Novo in a debate, although the party had not elected five parliamentarians and currently had that number. He said that another decision prohibited questions to an absent candidate, whose campaign had signed the rules, and classified one measure as an elastic interpretation of the law and the other as censorship. #Debate #Política #LiberdadeDeExpressão (translated)

Allan Dos Santos published five questions about the first round of the election. He questioned why the Workers' Party would be so desperate and if it had anything to do with a request for the release of Marcinho VP after 30 years of imprisonment. He also asked if ministers from the Supreme Federal Court were threatened by members of the PCC and CV. Dos Santos further asked why the United States had closed embassies while part of their military forces was on Brazilian territory and spoke about a terrorist threat. Finally, he questioned if any politician was aware of the threat and was relying on it to prevent the elections, before returning to the question about the Workers' Party. #Eleições2023 #PolíticaBrasileira #SegurançaPública (translated)

Guga Noblat stated that Renan Santos had not prepared questions for Flávio or other candidates in the Globo debate, as he had been included at the last minute after a court injunction. According to Noblat, Arthur do Val remarked in a conversation with him that Flávio "ended up being at a disadvantage." #Debate #Eleições2023 #Política (translated)

Deltan Dallagnol stated that the TSE and the STF interfered in the election to protect Lula. According to him, Lula did not attend the last debate, and the Electoral Justice prohibited Globo from showing the candidate's empty podium and prevented the other participants from asking him questions. Dallagnol said that the decision led to the cancellation of the debate due to legal insecurity and deprived voters of the last opportunity to compare the candidates. He classified the judicial actions as biased and asked for the video to be shared. #Eleições2024 #Justiça #Lula (translated)

The author stated that Globo gave up on the debate not because the Justice had prevented the presence of an empty chair on stage and questions directed at an absent person, but because Lula did not accept what he called a trap and Flávio had backed down in front of Renan Santos. He also used derogatory language against those who believed in the first explanation and classified the other reactions as complaints. #debate #Lula #Globo (translated)

Sam Pancher wrote that he believed the part considered censorship was the prohibition of asking questions to the absent candidate. According to him, this practically prevented the other candidates from addressing the one who was absent. https://t.co/uAyqLP61il #Censura #Eleições #Democracia (translated)

The account ⚖️WE THE PEOPLE 🙌 .•. wrote that, according to Globo's own legal commentator, the decision of the magistrate to remove a chair or podium and not question an absent person, who could not defend themselves, was justified. It also stated that no penalty should expose the punished to humiliation. https://t.co/8hXhcrvb2c #justiça #direitoshumanos #ética (translated)

When even Rede Globo says that the Judiciary interfered in the debate, it means things are very serious. The rules of the debate were clear: those who did not attend would have their podium and name retained, and could even receive questions in one of the segments. https://t.co/Wea5YHbzXK #Judiciário #Debate #Política (translated)

FLÁVIO KNOWS HOW TO DO IT! And f*** whoever thinks he should go. The trap was set. 2 decisions: Release Father Kelmon from Lula to attack Flávio & PROHIBIT directing questions to the absent ex-convict. What would be left? Bombardment of Flávio, nothing more. Congratulations @FlavioBolsonaro #FlávioBolsonaro #Política #DebatePolítico (translated)

### URGENT: MINISTER NOMINATED BY LULA AT TSE ALSO CENSORS CANDIDATES AND PROHIBITS THEM FROM ASKING QUESTIONS TO LULA IN THE DEBATE. People, even during the military dictatorship, censorship was not this heavy!!! What is this??? #Censura #Democracia #LiberdadeDeExpressão (translated)

At the exact time of the debate, the president will be at the Flow Podcast, granting an exclusive interview to Igor 3K. Not knowing beforehand what the questions are, as always happens there, the leftist submits himself to the unpredictability of the frank conversation. But without the conspiracy of the chess pigeons of FUEDEC. What the hell is FUEDEC, Reinaldo?! Read in my column at @Metropoles. https://t.co/FJARLn4Swn #Debate #Entrevista #Política (translated)