WRLD

Search

#Judiciário

Leandro Ruschel stated that Edson Fachin was advocating for a reform of the Judiciary without altering guarantees, but he questioned which guarantees he was referring to. According to Ruschel, in recent years, the Federal Supreme Court had restricted constitutional rights such as free expression, association, and manifestation, in addition to the right to defense, the natural judge, and due process. He said this had occurred especially with people who did not align with what he called the court's leftism. Ruschel also criticized the defense that the reform should be made "with the Judiciary." According to him, it is up to the Legislative to draft laws, while the Judiciary should apply them and assess their compatibility with the Constitution. He added that courts can propose laws regarding their own organization, but the decision falls to Congress, and they cannot present constitutional amendments. For Ruschel, the expression used by Fachin would be a euphemism for the usurpation of Congress's powers. #Judiciário #Reforma #GarantiasCivis (translated)

2702
Julio Schneider 🇧🇷🇺🇸 22h

Julio Schneider stated that it would be difficult to improve the Judiciary in the face of corporatism and the blatant concern for self-interests. He also said it would be clear to whom, according to him, that group served, and used derogatory language to refer to its members. https://t.co/lyvrWVfiFh #Judiciário #Reforma #Política (translated)

2033
Vinicius Carrion 22h

Vinicius Carrion stated that corporatism and the focus on personal interests would hinder the improvement of the Judiciary. He said that the need for reform indicated, in his assessment, that the system was already weak and did not meet the expectations of taxpayers. https://t.co/8zQY5EPJgz #Justiça #ReformaJudiciária #Corporativismo (translated)

2214
Gustavo Cunha 2d

Gustavo Tutinha stated that the vice president of the TJ, whom he referred to as Dona Suely, decided during the judicial shift on Saturday afternoon that the internal regulations of the court itself were not valid. He reacted with irony and said he believed the situation was clear. #justiça #TJ #direito (translated)

2499
Jeffrey Chiquini 2d

Jeffrey Chiquini stated that the reform of the Judiciary should eliminate political appointments to the higher courts. He said that a Judiciary made up of politicians in robes would not be independent and advocated for judicial independence as a condition for impartiality. Chiquini declared that, in the first week of the legislature, he would call public hearings to start discussions and present proposals for the reform of the justice system. According to him, entities from the sector, state and national associations of the judiciary, associations of the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Bar Association, and the Public Defender's Office would be invited. He also advocated for the appreciation of career judges, which he described as a right and a guarantee of society, and said that he would seek to restore legal security. #ReformaJudiciária #Justiça #IndependênciaJudiciária (translated)

3134
Jornal Expresso 2d

The PGR is prosecuting judges who annulled investigations that had been underway for a long time, raising important questions about the investigation of crimes and the efficiency of the judicial system. #JavaScript #AdBlocker #WebDevelopment (translated)

expresso.pt
PGR contra juízes que anulam investigações demoradas: o que está em causa em 12 pontos
2655
Gustavo Cunha 2d

Gustavo Tutinha reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the TJRJ, ordered the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors to be held at Maracanã and took into account the history of conflicts between Vasco and the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. Tutinha stated that the magistrate pointed out that the club had already sought justice to use the stadium and that the concessionaire had repeated justifications related to the condition of the pitch, which could indicate a "personal issue" between the parties. According to Tutinha, Ibrahim also considered a Memorandum of Understanding between Vasco and the concessionaire. The club argued that the document guaranteed it four matches per season at Maracanã, excluding classics against Flamengo and Fluminense, and that any refusals should be based on objective technical and operational criteria. Tutinha added that Vasco pointed out a contradiction in how the concessionaire invoked the memorandum to restrict access but contested its binding force when it provided rights to the club. Ibrahim considered the document in his reasoning but did not make a definitive decision on the enforceability of all clauses. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

3231
JH Fonseca 3d

JH Fonseca described Jair Bolsonaro as a national hero and political prisoner, claimed that he was a victim of torture imposed by a judiciary that he classified as corrupt, and called for his release. https://t.co/SV6ncw8XDV #Liberdade #Justiça #DireitosHumanos (translated)

2902
g1 3d

G1 reported that Dino reported threats and stated that if a judge were afraid to decide, there would no longer be a Judiciary. https://t.co/ogIYMoJwr7 #g1 #PoderJudiciário #Justiça #Direitos (translated)

2681
poponze 3d

Felipe Goldenboy warned that a potential government of Flávio Bolsonaro could weaken democracy and advocated voting for Lula in the second round. According to him, the support would not depend on liking Lula or the PT, but on the fear of a return to dictatorship. Goldenboy stated that Flávio would have a majority in the judiciary and the executive and would like to change the Constitution; he also said that institutions could be closed by legal means, without the deployment of military forces. #Democracia #Lula #Eleições2022 (translated)

3241
Silvio Matias 3d

Silvio Matias mentioned frauds in the INSS and in the MASTER case, as well as the alleged involvement of relatives, friends, politicians, and members of the Judiciary. He also cited cases of corruption during the 20 years of PT governments and stated that, in his assessment, a Brazil with freedom and economic and social growth would only be possible with Flávio in the Presidency. https://t.co/BzKbQZ7A9d #Corrupção #Brasil #Liberdade (translated)

2907
Leonardo Dias 3d

Leonardo Dias wrote that, according to VEJA magazine (issue 3016, from 10/9/2026), Daniel Vorcaro reportedly detailed in audio and in material submitted to the PGR in June how Banco Master obtained access to the pension funds of state entities. In the version attributed to Vorcaro, Jaques Wagner allegedly facilitated the connection, and partner Augusto Lima reportedly met with João Vaccari Neto. Dias stated that Vorcaro described a payment of about R$ 30 million in cash for Oliver Stone's documentary about Lula, through Paulo Okamotto, in addition to an undisclosed amount to the Lula Institute. Later, according to the report, the Master would pay 10% of what it raised from the funds of BB, Caixa, Petrobras, and Correios: Vorcaro estimated R$ 1 billion for the PT and R$ 9 billion for himself. The author also mentioned messages found on Vorcaro's cell phone. According to Dias, an operator identified as Júlio introduced him to Olavo Noleto, the executive secretary of Alexandre Padilha. On 4/29/2024, Master was said to have entered a list that released the funds; on the same day, Júlio allegedly demanded R$ 500,000. Two days later, a dinner with Padilha was said to have occurred at the banker’s house. In October, Júlio reportedly wrote that the president would meet with Vorcaro. Dias added that Padilha allegedly said dealing with Noleto was equivalent to dealing with him. According to the author, the operation stopped in July 2024, after it became public that Caixa managers opposed to the deal had lost their positions. Vorcaro was said to have claimed that municipal funds yielded R$ 6 million to Padilha’s group. Dias compared this amount to the more than R$ 60 million from Dark Horse and reported that Vorcaro differentiated the payments linked to Lula from those related to Flávio. Dias noted that Lula, Padilha, and Noleto denied the accusations. He also stated that there was no evidence that the meeting with Lula promised by Júlio took place; the only confirmed meeting at the Planalto, on 12/4/2024 and outside the official agenda, reportedly dealt with the Master at the Central Bank. The author said that the PGR dismissed the attachment due to a lack of evidence of cash payments and that the same archived material mentioned payments to Davi Alcolumbre and members of the Judiciary. #Lula #Corrupção #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

3358
Flávio Bolsonaro 4d

Upon receiving support, Flávio has reiterated in his speeches the importance of having a majority in Congress to make changes to the Constitution, such as reforming the judicial system to "redemocratize" the country and end the reelection of the President. #Eleições2026 #FlávioBolsonaro #LulaDaSilva (translated)

Bolsonaro tem apoio de cinco partidos e Lula recalcula rota
observador.pt
3140
Ivan Kleber 4d

Ivan Kleber wrote that the United States Justice had accused Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores of conspiracy to commit torture against American citizens. According to him, the accusation also pointed to Maduro's involvement with the Cartel de Los Soles and claimed that Maduro, Flores, and people from their circle were part of the group and trafficked drugs under the protection of the Venezuelan Army, the Judiciary, and security forces. #Maduro #Venezuela #Justiça (translated)

3480
Flávio Bolsonaro 5d

Do you think Brazil is in a full democracy? No. We have to respect politics; there are several PECs [Proposals for Constitutional Amendments] that are possible. Presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro clarified this Wednesday what he meant by "changing the Constitution" to "re-democratize" Brazil, stating that he was referring to the end of re-election, lowering the age of majority for criminal purposes, and reforming the judicial system. #Eleições2026 #FlávioBolsonaro #MudançaConstitucional (translated)

Flávio afasta especulações sobre a Constituição
observador.pt
1915
Observador 5d

Flávio Bolsonaro clarifies that the changes he proposes to the Constitution aim to end re-election, reduce the age of criminal responsibility, and reform the Judiciary, emphasizing that these changes should be discussed and approved by the National Congress. #Eleições2026 #FlávioBolsonaro #MudançaConstitucional (translated)

observador.pt
Flávio afasta especulações sobre a Constituição
1915
JH Fonseca 5d

JH Fonseca stated that Flávio Bolsonaro had mentioned the reduction of the legal age, the end of re-election, and judicial reform as proposals for constitutional amendment through PECs. Fonseca questioned why leftist people would be shocked by this type of proposal and stated that Lula was the president who proposed the most PECs. #Política #Constituição #PEC (translated)

3270
Sidnelson 6d

Sidnelson stated that Senator Rogério Marinho would confront by bringing Minister Fachin criticisms regarding what he called the intervention of certain ministers of the Judiciary in the elections. He also argued that this situation should end. https://t.co/NArMw1cwVP #Política #Eleições2022 #Justiça (translated)

2940
Rogério Marinho🇧🇷 6d

Rogério Marinho stated that threats attributed to ministers of the Supreme Court, made through the press, reinforced his opinion that the Supreme Court should not act as a police station. He considered it unacceptable for members of the Court to try to pressure Parliament with inquiries or judicial measures to prevent Congress from overseeing the Supreme Court. Marinho advocated for an urgent reform of the Judiciary so that the Supreme Court would be limited to the function of a constitutional court, as he believes occurs in mature democracies. He also said that this change would restore democratic normality and the balance between the branches of government, and stated that the population had rejected abuses at the polls. #ReformaJudiciária #Supremo #Democracia (translated)

3281
Flávio Bolsonaro 6d

This is an idea that is not entirely dismissed by the candidate Flávio Bolsonaro and, therefore, what we have here is, for me, the biggest loser is undoubtedly the Judiciary, not only because of the signal that people gave at the polls, but because facing an interventionism from the Judiciary is very difficult and is not something that can be done without other negative impacts on the functioning of the institutions themselves. #Eleições2026 #LulaDaSilva #FlávioBolsonaro (translated)

Brasil: e agora?
observador.pt
2150