Search

Vasyl Zvarych stated that the Russian attack on the power plant in Kyiv caused power outages in many parts of the city and that there were subsequent attacks on energy facilities in the Kharkiv region. According to him, this occurred only after the statement by the President of the United States about an energy ceasefire, which Russia violated. #Rusko #Kyjev #energie (translated)

The commentary analyzes the failure of the ANO movement in the municipal elections, where the party, despite Prime Minister Babiš's statements about its strong position, weakened in regional cities and faced competition from traditional and new political forces, while the ODS is losing its status as the main opposition force. #volby #ANO #politika (translated)

Vláďa Foltán stated that Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom joined forces against Donald Trump's sanctions against the International Criminal Court and strongly rejected Trump. According to him, their foreign ministers confirmed in a joint statement their lasting support for the independence, impartiality, and integrity of the court. #Mezinárodníprávo #Diplomacie #Sankce (translated)

The author wrote that after taking control of the parliament of Saxony-Anhalt, the AfD and BSW clubs issued a joint statement in which they called for peaceful negotiations, the restoration of relations with Russia, the end of sanctions, and the cessation of financial support for Ukraine. He stated that this answered the question of whether they are extremist parties or merely a voice of dissatisfied people. #politika #Sasko #AfD #DE #RU #UA (translated)

The newspaper P – Paukner Media claimed that the Kolín company Draslovka continued to operate in the Russian market despite a statement from March 2022 about halting supplies to Russia. It identified Jan Dobrovský as a co-owner, describing him as a significant supporter of the STAN movement and other politicians. The author stated that according to a study by the Russian institute Агентство Плодородия, Draslovka's exports to Russia increased from 300 tons of pesticides worth $500,000 in 2021 to 1,000 tons for $1.9 million in 2022. Records from the customs database Volza reportedly also captured shipments of the product Retacel 750 in 2022, including three shipments of 21,396 units, valued at $49,817.25, $49,414.29, and $49,168.93. The post further claimed that Draslovka made additional supplies in 2023 and obtained an extension of its license to sell pesticides in Russia until 2034 in 2024. According to the author, the company collaborated with Russian authorities during the licensing process, and its products were sold to both farmers and retail in Russia. The newspaper P – Paukner Media also stated that the owners of Draslovka and Dobrovský supported political entities and personalities that, according to him, acted against Russia. It attributed a donation of over 300,000 crowns to Dobrovský for Petr Pavel and noted that the group BPD Partners was the largest patron of STAN. In 2025, Dobrovský was reported to contribute 1.7 million crowns to the movement from his own funds. The author also mentioned support for the coalition SPOLU, Danuše Nerudová, and Jan Farský. The post criticized the contradiction between the declared termination of operations in Russia and the described supplies and licensing process. It noted that neither the group BPD Partners nor Draslovka responded to its inquiries about business in Russia. It also asked whether STAN or the coalition SPOLU would take a stance on their supporter’s business activities. #RuskáFederace #Politika #STAN (translated)

Eva Pavlová, the First Lady of the Czech Republic, faced harsh criticism for her statement about the electoral conditions for citizens, which sparked a debate about her husband, President Petr Pavel's, absence from the upcoming municipal elections due to his vacation. #komunálnívolby #politika #PetrPavel (translated)

Martin Bartkovský stated that after sharing a statement from 40 editors-in-chief, he criticized the journalistic community for failing to unanimously agree on a rejection of violence and equal access to information sharing. He added that he generally expressed his personal opinion about those who repeatedly did not stand up for their colleagues. Subsequently, according to him, he received a number of insults and comparisons to communists. He emphasized that by not signing the statement, in his view, no harm was caused to anyone nor will it be. He stated that he did not plan to fire, kill, or hang anyone and did not prepare lists of inconvenient people. He thanked the remaining 39 editors-in-chief for supporting their colleagues across the field and apologized to them that the discussion had shifted in a different direction due to his contribution. He responded to criticism with several other apologies, including to podcast entrepreneurs, a former colleague, a Czech writer, and a former MEP. Regarding the former colleague, he recalled that for the last 10 years, the status of journalism had been labeled bad, despite the fact that they worked for the same media for six years, which the colleague led. He also mentioned that he apologized for his surname starting with the letter B, which he had for 37 years, and for the reference to Chinese spies. He also apologized to the media Euro, Info, Zdopravy, Okraj, and Chiptron, which he said were not invited to the statement, despite discussions about its wording lasting a month. He offered to connect anyone interested in adding their signature with the organizers, among whom he claimed he did not belong. In a note, he stated that he deleted the original post because he confused two writers and mistook a father for a son in connection with the anti-chart. He apologized for the error, yet called the comparison to the anti-chart inappropriate, stating that parallels with the communist past, in his view, did not help anything. #žurnalistika #svobodaSlova #politika (translated)

Martin Bartkovský stated that when he shared the statement from forty editors-in-chief, he did not expect the reaction it would provoke. He criticized that the journalistic community he addressed, according to him, was unable to unanimously agree even on rejecting violence in their relationship with politicians and on equal access to sharing information. He added that he expressed his personal judgment about those who repeatedly refused to stand up for their colleagues in an indirect manner. For that, he claimed to have received a number of insults and comparisons to communists; one of the people who signed the Anticharta wrote to him that he had never seen anything more disgusting. Bartkovský clarified that not signing the statement did not harm anyone and would not harm anyone, and he rejected the idea that he wanted to dismiss, threaten, or create lists of uncomfortable people. He thanked the remaining 39 editors-in-chief for their support for colleagues from the entire field and apologized to them for the discussion veering in a different direction due to his contribution. He then made a series of apologies that he delivered ironically: among other things, to podcast entrepreneurs for reminding him of something other than Chinese communism, to a former colleague for criticizing journalism at a time when they both worked in the same media for six years, and to a Czech writer for reminding him of his signature on the Anticharta. He also apologized to those who labeled him a "svazák" (a term for a member of the youth organization during the communist regime) and to a former Member of the European Parliament regarding his judgment about Bartkovský's character. He added that he also apologizes to the media outlets Euro, Info, Zdopravy, Okraj, and Chiptron, which, according to him, were not addressed, even though the text had been discussed for a month. He offered to connect interested parties with the organizers of the statement so that they could join him. #žurnalistika #komunikace #mediálníetiketa (translated)

The Chief of the General Staff of the Czech Armed Forces, Lieutenant General Miroslav Hlaváč, stated that the army withdrew the patronage of the commander of the Air Force from the Future Air Force conference. He cited information about the public activities, contacts, and actions of the individuals involved in the organization, which he claimed contradicted the security interests of the Czech Republic, the government's program declaration, and the interests of allies. Hlaváč said that the army did not want to lend its name or prestige to events associated with people who he claimed questioned Euro-Atlantic commitments. According to him, the organizers should have chosen between these individuals and the Czech Army; both could not coexist simultaneously. He added that the protection of state security and the credibility of the army took precedence. (translated)