Search

Raisa Simplicio reported that a tomography identified two fractures in the jaw of defender Danilo. According to her, a specialized evaluation indicated surgery, which the player agreed to. Danilo was discharged from the hospital, and the procedure was scheduled for Monday (12) at the end of the morning, with maxillofacial surgeon Gustavo Machado and the accompaniment of Flamengo's doctors Fernando Sassaki and Luiz Macedo. #Danilo #Flamengo #Cirurgia (translated)

Ruan reported that the defender Danilo underwent a computed tomography scan that revealed two fractures in the jaw. According to him, after a specialized evaluation, surgical treatment was recommended, which the player agreed to. Danilo was discharged from the hospital, and the surgery was scheduled for this Monday (12), in the late morning, with maxillofacial surgeon Gustavo Machado and oversight from Flamengo doctors Fernando Sassaki and Luiz Macedo. #Flamengo #Danilo #saúde (translated)

Lázaro Rosa reacted with enthusiasm and stated that the other candidate wanted to cut R$ 250 billion from the budget, which, according to him, would affect the treatment of the people shown. He also defended the SUS and asked for support for Lula, saying that a victory for Flávio would harm the public. https://t.co/HN1BBGeDte #SUS #Eleições2022 #Saúde (translated)

Lula lamented the death of Telma de Souza, which occurred on Saturday, and stated that she was one of the founders of the PT and the only woman to lead the city of Santos. According to Lula, Telma left a legacy of humanized care and contributed to public policies on mental health and the prevention and treatment of AIDS. Lula said that the mental health network created by Telma in Santos was one of the precursors of the existing Psychosocial Care Centers (CAPS) today. He also stated that the initiatives for the prevention and treatment of AIDS implemented by her in the late 1980s served as a reference for other cities and for policies adopted by the SUS throughout the country. Lula declared his belief that the experiences and policies advocated by Telma saved lives and helped ensure more dignified treatment. He also expressed solidarity with her family, friends, and companions. #Luto #SaúdeMental #PolíticasPúblicas (translated)

The POP headquarters stated that Belle Daltro made a video about budget cuts to the Popular Pharmacy and cancer treatment. According to the profile, she spoke about elderly people who needed continuous medications, parents trying to maintain treatments for their children, and patients who depended on the SUS to treat diseases like cancer. Daltro said that the topic involved dignity, rights, and lives, not presidents or parties. #Saúde #DireitosHumanos #FarmáciaPopular (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that Vasco da Gama filed a motion with the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJRJ) to defend the decision that determined the availability of Maracanã for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana against Boca Juniors, scheduled for October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the publication, the document was filed on Saturday (the 10th) and requested that the attempt by the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision through a writ of security be rejected. The publication reported that the club argued that the court decision took into account statements from public security agencies and the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro. According to Vasco, the Military Police pointed to Maracanã as the preferred alternative, considering the infrastructure, urban mobility, fan organization, and access control. The club also questioned, according to the publication, the criteria used by the concessionaire to deny the stadium and argued that the requirements for preserving the pitch should be applied objectively and equally. The defense also stated that Conmebol had already announced Maracanã as the venue and that ticket sales were underway. By the morning of October 10, Vasco reported having sold 11,446 tickets and handed over 4,000 tickets to Boca Juniors for the visiting fans. Attention, Vasco fans! the club added that it warned of possible damages to the organization of the semifinal, to the supporters, and to the security planning if the decision were suspended. Vasco requested that the concessionaire's injunction be denied and that the writ of security be rejected, maintaining the decision that secured the stadium. According to the publication, the legal dispute was still ongoing. #Vasco #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha reported that Judge Marco Antônio Ibrahim, from the 23rd Chamber of Private Law of the TJRJ, ordered the match between Vasco and Boca Juniors to be held at Maracanã and took into account the history of conflicts between Vasco and the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. Tutinha stated that the magistrate pointed out that the club had already sought justice to use the stadium and that the concessionaire had repeated justifications related to the condition of the pitch, which could indicate a "personal issue" between the parties. According to Tutinha, Ibrahim also considered a Memorandum of Understanding between Vasco and the concessionaire. The club argued that the document guaranteed it four matches per season at Maracanã, excluding classics against Flamengo and Fluminense, and that any refusals should be based on objective technical and operational criteria. Tutinha added that Vasco pointed out a contradiction in how the concessionaire invoked the memorandum to restrict access but contested its binding force when it provided rights to the club. Ibrahim considered the document in his reasoning but did not make a definitive decision on the enforceability of all clauses. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

Vasco da Gama stated that the October Pink shirt aimed to remind the importance of taking care of health and observing the signals from one's own body. The club emphasized that the earlier the diagnosis was made, the greater the chances for treatment and recovery would be. The shirt would be available from October 15 at the Gigante de Colina Stores and the Vasco Store. #VascoDaGama #OutubroRosa #CâncerDeMama #Saúde (translated)

The Planet of Football reported that a judge from Rio de Janeiro denied, on the 6th, an appeal from Vasco to play against Boca Juniors at the Maracanã. According to the publication, the decision could still be changed until Saturday, the deadline for the club to indicate the location to Conmebol. The judge reportedly considered a more in-depth analysis of the evidence regarding the pitch, the calendar, and the operation necessary, in addition to requesting a response from the Fla-Flu Consortium. Vasco claimed unequal treatment and selective application of criteria, according to the post. The publication added that the Public Ministry recommended the use of the Maracanã, but the judge considered the recommendation non-binding for the Fla-Flu Consortium and insufficient to replace the contractual, technical, and operational assessments. #Vasco #Maracanã #BocaJuniors (translated)

The article addresses the inequality of access to healthcare in Portugal, highlighting the case of the luso-Brazilian twins and the ethical implications of the influences of political figures to expedite treatments, revealing a systemic problem of privileges that affects equity in the healthcare system. #JustiçaSocial #Ética #SaúdePública (translated)

Sérgio Santos stated that the government of Jair Bolsonaro was the worst in Brazil's history and said that he exposed, in his opinion, the behavior of the financial market and the Federal Medical Council. According to Santos, the market did not protest against the use of public resources for the reelection by a politician whom he described as an ex-convict. He also criticized the Council for not having released a note against the use of chloroquine in the treatment of covid, despite, as he wrote, a person he did not identify recommending it daily. Santos accused the Council of being dominated by supporters of Bolsonaro. Santos added that Bolsonaro's son would have exposed voters who, according to him, were not opposed to corruption but were against the poor and contrary to the left. #Bolsonaro #Corrupção #PolíticaBrasileira (translated)

The Magic Poc stated that she considered the treatment received by Ariela and Maíra to be unfair, saying that the whole house was against them and that, in her assessment, they had done nothing to justify the rudeness. She also said she hoped the public would support the two. #AFazenda18 #AFazenda18 #Justiça #Solidariedade (translated)

Santos FC stated that the victory that day was a tribute to Naty Potira, remembered on the club's uniform which, according to the publication, she loved and defended. The club dedicated the result to her and to those who died in the fight against cancer. In the message for Breast Cancer Awareness Month, Santos also emphasized the importance of awareness, prevention, early detection, treatment, and the support of loved ones. The publication encouraged readers to take care of their own health and that of those around them. #SantosFC #OutubroRosa #Saúde (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Vasco filed an appeal on Friday (02) at the TJRJ against the decision of the 2nd Civil Court that did not analyze its urgent request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors and suspended the process for 20 days, after a statement from Fla-Flu Serviços in 48 hours. According to Tutinha, Vasco argued that it needs to indicate the stadium to CONMEBOL by 10/05 for the match on 10/20 at 21:30, and that the suspension could make a subsequent decision pointless. The club requested that Judge Rose Marie Pimentel Martins, from the 5th Chamber of Public Law, grant the request directly for Maracanã to be made available. As an alternative, it requested the end of the suspension and that the first-instance judge analyze the preliminary injunction without waiting for the appeal related to the popular action. Tutinha reported that Vasco also contested the technical criteria used to deny the stadium and claimed a contradiction in the concessionaire's position on the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Vasco, Flamengo, and Fluminense. The club stated that the restrictions should be applied in a non-discriminatory manner and cited ten official matches held at Maracanã in May 2026, nine of them between the 9th and 30th, including games on consecutive days: Fluminense x Bolívar on 05/19, and Flamengo x Estudiantes on 05/20; Flamengo x Cusco on 05/26, and Fluminense x Deportivo La Guaira on 05/27. According to Tutinha, Vasco also mentioned the indication of Maracanã by PMERJ as the most suitable option for security planning. Among the requests, it included non-discriminatory commercial and operational conditions, a maximum ticket load according to the authorized capacity, and a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Lito Sousa passed away at the age of 59. Lito became known for transforming his decades of knowledge in aviation into accessible content for millions of people, explaining accidents, procedures, and curiosities about the sector in a didactic and relaxed manner. His channel became one of the main references on aviation in Brazil. The influencer, pilot, and aviation expert was facing Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), a rare and aggressive neurodegenerative disease. In recent weeks, Lito underwent experimental treatment and remained under medical care due to the rapid progression of the disease. Rest in peace, Lito. We wish comfort to the family, friends, and fans. #Aviation #Luto #Homenagem (translated)

🚨 VASCO CONTESTS TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF FLA-FLU, POINTS OUT VIOLATION OF CONCESSION RULES AND CITES DECISION FROM TJRJ IN ACTION FOR MARACANÃ Vasco filed an obligation lawsuit on Wednesday (1st) with a request for urgent protective measures to try to secure the Maracanã against Boca Juniors on October 20, for the semifinal of the South American Cup. In the action, the club directly questions the technical criteria used by Fla-Flu to deny the stadium, points out unequal treatment, supports violations of concession rules, and also explores a contradiction involving the Memorandum of Understanding. 📌 WHAT FLA-FLU ALLEGED In response to Vasco, the concessionaire pointed to the accumulated wear of the lawn, the climatic conditions of July and August, and the need to preserve the intervals designated for field maintenance. For 10/20, Fla-Flu specifically mentioned games of Fluminense on 10/18 and Flamengo on 10/22. With Vasco x Boca between these matches, there would be three games in five days. According to the concessionaire, this sequence would prevent procedures such as helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and repair of damage to the lawn. 📌 VASCO QUESTIONS THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION The first counterpoint is the lawn itself. Vasco highlights that, three days after the denial, it was announced that the existing field would be removed and new Bermuda Celebration rolls would be placed, with the return of football scheduled for 10/08. Vasco x Boca will be on 10/20. The club's thesis is that it would not be possible to use the accumulated wear of the old lawn as justification for a match that will take place 12 days after the return of football to the renewed field. 📌 GREENLEAF DOCUMENT IS USED BY VASCO Vasco also retrieves the technical planning prepared by Greenleaf, the company responsible for lawn maintenance, in August. According to the action, the document shows that the same procedures cited by Fla-Flu to deny Vasco x Boca have already been carried out in a concentrated manner between matches. The petition states that helical mowing, targeted fertilization, supplemental lighting, and damage repair have even been grouped in a single day after a match, even in a winter scenario and lawn wear. The question posed by Vasco is direct: if this work could be done in August to accommodate the sequence of games from Flamengo and Fluminense, why couldn't it be repeated in October, after the complete lawn replacement? 📌 INTERVAL BETWEEN GAMES Vasco also contests the argument of three games in five days by comparing the situation with the recent calendar of the Maracanã. The action argues that sequences with reduced intervals for Flamengo and Fluminense matches have already been admitted. For Vasco, if the necessary interval for lawn recovery is decisive for denying a match, that criterion must be applied equally to all clubs. 📌 SHOWS AND OTHER EVENTS The action also points out that the Maracanã hosts shows, religious gatherings, and events from other sports, including the installation of structures and occupancy of the field area. Vasco questions how the administration can reconcile these events with lawn preservation, yet considers it technically unfeasible to host a semifinal of CONMEBOL. According to the data presented in the action, at least seven extraordinary events unrelated to official football were held between 2025 and 09/30/2026. 📌 CONCESSION NOTICE Vasco cites item 3.4 of the Terms of Reference, which gives priority to football events from the official calendars of FIFA, CONMEBOL, CBF, and FERJ over other events. Vasco x Boca is an official semifinal of CONMEBOL. The action argues that there would be an "inversion of this priority" by accommodating shows and other events and denying the stadium for a match that, under the concession rules cited by the club, should have priority. The petition mentions "distortion of the concessionaire's obligations" and "violation of the equal treatment required by the Concession Notice." 📌 UNEQUAL TREATMENT Vasco summarizes its challenge in four points: • the lawn replacement would change the premise of accumulated wear; • Greenleaf's own planning would demonstrate that maintenance could be carried out between matches; • the calendar would show reduced intervals that have already been admitted for Flamengo and Fluminense; • other events are reconciled with the necessary care for field preservation. As a result, Vasco asserts that restrictions are being applied selectively. The action further cites clause 13.2 of the Concession Contract, which prohibits favoritism and unjustifiably different, discriminatory treatment, or "without technical criteria" that results in restricted access to the Complex. 📌 THE CONTRADICTION POINTED OUT BY VASCO Fla-Flu claims not to recognize the validity of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2025. At the same time, according to Vasco, it uses the document itself—especially the provision for four matches conditioned on availability and operational conditions—to justify the denial. Vasco points out contradictory behavior and invokes the principle of good faith. 📌 PREVIOUS DECISION OF TJRJ The action also cites the Instrument Appeal No. 3023517-70.2026.8.19.0000. On that occasion, Justice Alexandre Freitas Câmara analyzed the discussion regarding the absence of Fla-Flu's signature on the Memorandum. The magistrate stated that Flamengo and Fluminense, members of the concessionaire, had signed the document and pointed out that disregarding it later could represent contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. 📌 RECOMMENDATION FROM BEPE The issue of public safety also appears as an argument for the use of the Maracanã. According to the action, BEPE (Specialized Battalion for Policing in Stadiums) recommended holding the match at the Maracanã due to the magnitude of the confrontation and the expected public turnout. Vasco uses this recommendation to argue that the Maracanã is not just a preference of the club. The petition points to the stadium as the option that best meets capacity, location, structure, security, and operational conditions to host the match against Boca. 📌 SÃO JANUÁRIO IS NOT AN OPTION Vasco also differentiates the situation from the previous process involving Vasco x Vitória, when it did not obtain a preliminary injunction to use the Maracanã. This time, according to the action, São Januário cannot host the semifinal. The South American Manual requires a minimum capacity of 30,000 spectators starting from the semifinals, while the petition indicates São Januário has approximately 21,880 seats. Vasco acknowledges the Nilton Santos Stadium as an alternative but argues that having another stadium does not resolve the issue brought to Justice: is there legitimate technical and contractual basis for Fla-Flu to deny Maracanã? 📌 WHAT VASCO SEEKS Vasco is seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Fla-Flu to make the Maracanã available for Vasco x Boca on 10/20 at 9:30 PM. The request includes the maximum ticket allocation corresponding to the authorized capacity, the use of necessary facilities for organizing the match, the implementation of a mosaic, and temporary installation of banners in the same manner allowed for the clubs that are members of the concessionaire. In case of non-compliance, Vasco requests a daily fine of R$ 1 million. Vasco must inform CONMEBOL by October 5 where it will hold the return match of the semifinal. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)