Search

100 Procent stated that LFI was pointed out as fueling the riots in France and that Charlie Weimers (SD) had taken the initiative to stop support for LFI's party group, which also included Swedish V. According to 100 Procent, Weimers hoped that the right would support the initiative. https://t.co/iZ1vAvOVxr #politics #Sverige #LFI (translated)

Ida Gabrielsson questioned after a discussion with Martin Ådahl whether there was any other party that the Center Party considered sufficiently acceptable. She wrote that C had tolerated the Social Democrats and the Green Party because they had previously agreed to govern with bourgeois economic policy so that C would not collaborate with the Sweden Democrats. At the same time, she argued, C had criticized S for its migration policy and rejected the Left Party despite V agreeing with C on the issue. Gabrielsson contrasted this with what she described as a contradiction in the Center Party's rhetoric on decency. She pointed to ministers from the Moderates whom she considered increasingly Trump-like and accused them of going after journalists and conducting negative campaigns, as well as statements from the KD leader, the right's talk of voters as voting cattle, and comments from Member of Parliament Lars Beckman (M) and Alice Teodorescu (KD), whom she described as conspiracy theorists. She wrote that Ådahl and C seemed to believe that the former alliance parties did not really support their current policy, but had been kidnapped by SD and deep down wanted to return to the era of Fredrik Reinfeldt. Gabrielsson argued that Ådahl and Magdalena Andersson seemed to think that the parties would return to the center when the Tidö cooperation ended. She called the view condescending and emphasized that the changes could also have been made deliberately and voluntarily. During the election campaign, Gabrielsson stated, she had spoken with a leading center-right politician from Stockholm about more people voting for SD in the area where she grew up. She recounted that she had highlighted material and social reasons for dissatisfaction and mentioned a neighbor who worked almost around the clock on his farm and cleared snow in half of Norrland during the winters. According to Gabrielsson, the center-right politician had responded that a difficult life did not excuse a vote for SD, as others with difficult lives did not vote for the party. Gabrielsson also relayed that her father, who grew up in Ockelbo, used to refer to C and the farmers as "the right aristocracy." On Tuesday, he had told her that he had closed the door on a DN Kultur journalist who wanted to discuss the family's background and life in the countryside and in the industrial town of Åmotsbruk. Her father had also criticized C as the worst party of the day and said he preferred the party when it was at least a farmers' party. Gabrielsson wrote that she had corrected him, but at the same time agreed that a party with 7 percent could be perceived as self-satisfied if it assumed that others would follow its line. #Centerpartiet #Sverige #politik (translated)

Per Lindgren urged the nation to listen from timestamp 100:00 and onwards. He wrote that the left had tried to portray it as untrue and as racist lies from the right, and asked how that aligned with people's descriptions of the situation in Rinkeby. https://t.co/NITTVqeqjl #Sverige #Rinkeby #Politik (translated)

Dan Eriksson criticized Morgan Johansson (S) for claiming that the right-wing government forced the Army Museum to close. Eriksson wrote that Johansson should have directed his criticism instead at the fact that the state compensated the National Museum and the Historical Museum for increased rents, but not the Army Museum. According to Eriksson, the rents were set by the National Property Board, whose director general, Max Elger, had previously been the financial markets minister in Magdalena Andersson's government, responsible for the authority. He wrote that Elger had publicly defended the significantly increased museum rents in the spring and stated that the agency had no choice. Eriksson noted that market rents for state museums were introduced in 1993 and that the Social Democrats had been in power for twenty years since then without changing the model. He also wrote that the museum’s own management had decided on the closure. According to the chief curator, the rent increase triggered the decision, but was not decisive, as the museum wanted to move to larger premises anyway. Eriksson argued that Johansson's phrasing sounded like a campaign poster even three weeks after the election. He added that the Social Democrats could soon take over both the rent model and the director general, and wrote that it would then be interesting to see what the party cared about. #socialdemokraterna #musepolitik #högerregeringen (translated)

The writer wondered why the right was upset that the imams in Järva had urged everyone to vote. The post stated that Frida Sundkvist had gone to Rinkeby to clarify the debate about election fraud and asked if anyone had actually cheated, or if the right did not want the poor, immigrants, and Muslims to vote. https://t.co/pULJjI77OQ #valfusk #röstning #Järva #SE (translated)

Christian Peterson wrote that ETC had long questioned the financing of right-wing media and referred to a previous statement by the editor-in-chief, Andreas Gustavsson, that it was relevant to examine who financed the media. Peterson stated that ETC reacted when the editorial team understood what he was working on. According to him, his contacts with shareholders were described as an attempt to intimidate engaged individuals. He also wrote that Gustavsson presented theories that the investigation was commissioned by the Sweden Democrats (SD), while Mathias Wåg, whom Peterson described as a founder of Swedish Antifa, called it a serious threat to press freedom. Peterson wrote that the reactions came before the investigation had barely had time to be published. https://t.co/tah1UzUyt7 #Media #Pressfrihet #Finansiering (translated)

Glenn wrote that he republished an older review of the media company ETC, in which he had claimed that the company deliberately took taxpayers' money from the public. He referred to an article by Assar Christian about ETC's shareholders and stated that the company's connections to the Social Democrats were particularly interesting. Glenn wrote that he recognized several things from his own review and claimed that ETC had since continued to receive almost 60 million kronor in taxpayer money to discredit the right. #mediegranskning #politik #skattepengar (translated)

Flávio Bolsonaro is trying to win back his father's voters in the dangerous suburbs of Rio de Janeiro by participating in a motorcycle caravan and promoting his right-wing nationalist agenda ahead of the Brazilian presidential election. #FlávioBolsonaro #Brasilien #Högernationalism (translated)

"S has not pushed Swedish politics forward in 30 years. Rather, they have dragged themselves along after the right, complained about details (some should have a job tax deduction but not all, there should be a 14-year age of criminal responsibility, not 13) and threatened with twelve SD ministers." https://t.co/OlnVesIM68 #svpol #politik #Sverige (translated)

Strange that S and C are so angry if they really think V is a draw for the right. And why don't simply S, C, and MP report that V gets the exploratory assignment when they now believe V can succeed with what they themselves wanted, to attract us right-wing parties? None of them have succeeded so far, but now that V has made this coalition, new opportunities for broad agreements in the center realm are opening up, all according to S and C's dream scenario. Good night! #politik #koalition #Sverige (translated)

Klart lämpligast att leda Sverige framåt som statsminister är: @BuschEbba -respekterad av både mitten & högern -internationellt erkänd -höga förtroendesiffror -har inte lovat ministerposter till SD men kan tolereras av SD. Låt Ebba sondera möjligheterna att bilda regering. https://t.co/4VYZaaZqkB #SverigesPolitik #Statsminister #Regering

Varenda gång vi i högern är förbannade kommer public sevice med påståenden om konspirationer. Angående valfusk skickade de först ut Youcefi på eftermiddagen, därefter Saliuh i Aktuellt (enbart för att han hade "källor"). Och nu detta: @svt @sverigesradio https://t.co/y6jjfrPLis #politik #konspiration #svt

DN tror att min tystnad är ett tecken på att V kommer att vika ned oss i regeringsfrågan. Med risk för att göra DN-tyckarna besvikna, det kan ni bara ta och glömma. Oändliga är analyserna om vem som ”spelar spelet” bäst, allt ses igenom PR-mässiga glasögon, som har lite med politik att göra, och i bästa fall, en del att göra med populärpsykologi. Men grejen för mig är att det har allt med sakpolitik att göra och väldigt lite med psykologi eller spel. Det enda den som vill ha en annan regering än Tidö kan vinna på att spinna att V ”kommer vika ned sig” är ett blame game, vid ett eventuellt misslyckande att bilda regering. Regeringsmakten vinner man inte utan att V är med. Så det gäller att ha koll på prioriteringarna för regeringsbildaren. Det är vad jag menar med raka rör. Varför DN tror att jag skulle twittra om regeringsfrågan i samband med beskedet om utredningen om valfusk begriper jag inte, som jag ser det hade det varit direkt ohyfsat. Där hade jag nog fått medhåll även av PR-branschen. Det pågår nu en polisutredning där vi likt alla andra fick informationen via media. PR-konsulter försöker nu vilt sälja in sina upplägg om ”hur man ska göra”, men jag tror att dom glömmer en viktig sak, till syvende och sist handlar det ju trots allt om en människa, en person som än så länge inte delgivits misstanke om brott och som över en natt blivit rikskänd. Anklagelserna är allvarliga och undersökningen behöver få gå till botten med vad som hänt. Det ska inte V, jag eller ”vi” här på X göra. Jag förstår att det en del kan ha varit störigt att se mig ensam i Aktuellt förklara mandatfördelningen. Folk verkade dessutom köpa bilden, att vi ju faktiskt är fyra partier som behövs om Magdalena Andersson ska bli vald och att V ökat mest. Anledningen till att det ”går hem” är inte min härliga personlighet utan för att jag/V har världens enklaste case. Vi säger ja till hela regeringsunderlaget som kan få Magda vald, C säger nej till både Magdas och Ulfs underlag. C som hållit sig undan i massa dagar, poppar nu upp igen för att ge kommentarer om V:s regeringsduglighet. Säkert bra spel men raka rör är det inte. Eventuell oro man har löser man bättre bättre genom att faktiskt ses, är min bild. Och en sak som är grunden för regeringsduglighet är att klara av att ingå i en majoritet som kan få en regering vald. Att respektera andra trots olikheter och att sedan ge och ta i sakförhandlingar. C verkar inte behöva styra sitt parti, eftersom få pressar dom att välja. Hela gänget kan bete sig lite som riksdagens sk ”vildar”. Dom kan orsaka två regeringskriser under samma mandatperiod pga dom inte förstår att man måste ge och ta om man inte har egna mandat. Två budgetar har C fällt för ”sin” egen regering eftersom riksdagsgruppen beslutade så. Nu måste dom inse att väljer man en statsminister ingår dennes underlag och då kan man inte flippa sina 25 mandat hit och dit beroende på humör. Aftonbladet skriver ”snälla V sluta klanta er så att C inte byter sida”, är det ett sk Stockholms-syndrom eller vad är det som gör att den som är vänster försöker möjliggöra en gisslansituation undrar jag? Vi har inte två högerblock i svensk politik, Tidö vann inte valet. Att vi som vann valet ska låta ett parti ensamt få diktera villkoren är orimligt, byter dom sida är dom utraderade ur svensk politik, det finns inte tillräckligt med moderata stödröster för att ta in två ”liberala” partier på den högernationalistiska sidan. Skulle C utsätta sig för detta självmordsuppdrag ändå, så ligger det på dom, vi kan inte släpa runt på ett parti som inte kan bestämma sig för vilket ben dom ska stå på i val efter val. Låta dom stoppa det vi andra lovat våra väljare. Vad är värst höjda barnbidrag eller högernationalism? V eller SD? Bara att välja. V är tydliga, behövs våra röster ska vi ingå i regeringen. Det centerpartistiska känslolivet kommer inte härbärgeras av V. #politik #regering #Vänsterpartiet