Search

Rodrigo Constantino stated that, in his assessment, the PT resorted to fear because it could not defend its own government with numbers and that it predicted disasters if the opponent won. He said that voters affected by the cost of living and insecurity were not convinced by this discourse. #Política #Eleições2024 #PT (translated)

Flamengo stated that the officiating by Anderson Daronco and the VAR official, Rodolpho Toski Marques, had serious errors and inconsistent criteria in the match against Santos. The club said that Barreal should have been sent off for a tackle on Carrascal but only received a yellow card. Flamengo also challenged the penalty decision and the expulsion of Jorginho after a handball. According to the club, the incident caused a stoppage of 9 minutes and 56 seconds, a record interruption in a VAR review in the history of the Brasileirão. The team stated that the decision left them a player short and removed Jorginho from the next match. A few minutes later, according to Flamengo, another penalty was awarded to Santos after a foul that should not have occurred, resulting in the second goal for the São Paulo team from the penalty kick. The club also mentioned the numbers of the championship: in 29 matches, they had received seven red cards, the second-highest total in the competition, despite being in 17th place in the foul ranking and leading in average ball-in-play time. Flamengo claimed to be one of the three teams that committed the fewest fouls yet still the second most expelled. The statement also noted that Daronco and Toski were scheduled for the classic between Palmeiras and Corinthians on Sunday and requested that the rules be applied with rigor and impartiality. The club added that they were among the five finalists for the Best Men's Club of the Year award at the Ballon d'Or and stated that officiating errors harmed the results and the image of Brazilian football. #Arbitragem #Futebol #Brasileirão (translated)

The province of Manica, in Mozambique, has managed to reduce the number of people in food insecurity from 248,851 to about 101,000 in six months, thanks to an increase in agricultural production and irrigation measures implemented in the agricultural campaign of 2025-2026, although the situation at the national level continues to worsen. #Moçambique #SegurançaAlimentar #ElNino (translated)

Gustavo Gayer stated that the actions against Deltan Dallagnol were motivated by revenge. He described him as an elected senator from Paraná with over 2.9 million votes and said that he had been persecuted and ousted as a federal deputy, prevented from campaigning for the Senate and subjected to severe legal insecurity. Gayer classified the actions as an attack on the people of Paraná, who, according to him, had elected Dallagnol again. He also expressed solidarity with his friend before a trial at the TSE scheduled for the following day, wrote that he would not give up, and called for justice to prevail and for God to protect Dallagnol and his voters. #Vingança #Justiça #Solidariedade (translated)

Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas stated that almost 3 million residents of Paraná had trusted Deltan Dallagnol, despite the legal uncertainty and difficulties faced during the campaign. He described the voting as significant and as a democratic manifestation of the voters who chose their representative in the Senate. Freitas also portrayed Dallagnol as someone with a history of courage, fighting corruption, and commitment to Brazil, and advocated for justice to prevail and for the popular will to be respected. #Democracia #Eleições2023 #Coragem (translated)

Carlos Bolsonaro stated that Deltan Dallagnol had been elected senator for Paraná with more than 2.9 million votes, despite facing 15 days of suspended campaigning and, according to him, great legal uncertainty until election day. Bolsonaro said that voters in Paraná had chosen their representative and expressed solidarity with Dallagnol and the voters. He also stated that Dallagnol would be judged again by the TSE the following day and said he hoped that the law, legal security, and respect for the popular will would prevail. Bolsonaro added that democracy required balance among the Powers and respect for the vote, and that the choice made at the polls in Paraná should not be treated as a detail. #Democracia #Eleições #Justiça (translated)

Pam wrote that Flávio Bolsonaro had commented on the end of the bets and criticized the legal insecurity in the country. According to the publication, he recalled that he voted against the regulatory project presented by the government and stated that Lula's electoral measure would cause harm to Brazilian football. Bolsonaro also said that the decision would affect clubs and businesses, citing the example of stores that might have to discard jerseys with bets advertisements. #FlávioBolsonaro #SegurançaJurídica #FutebolBrasileiro (translated)

Filipe Barros wrote that Deltan Dallagnol was elected senator with 15 days less campaigning and, according to him, under great legal uncertainty until the day of the election. Barros stated that the voters of Paraná also evaluated those who tried to prevent Dallagnol from running. He also said that the senator would be judged again by the TSE the following day, but that the voters of Paraná had already given their verdict at the polls. For Barros, respecting democracy meant respecting the will of the people of Paraná. #Democracia #Eleições2022 #Paraná (translated)

Flavia Ferronato stated that the left is distant from the concerns of the population and said that attacks on Flávio, accusations of links to militias, and extreme-right labels would not cause as much fear as hunger and public insecurity. She also claimed that the population perceived a difference in legal treatment between calling a trans person a biological man and stealing a cell phone. Ferronato said that black, poor, and working-class people would have realized they were used and bought in recent years and stated that their incomes were no longer enough even to buy pumpkin. She declared that the PT (Worker's Party) was over and criticized the President of the Republic for, according to her, not having a cell phone to avoid annoyances. She also questioned Janja's role in the government. #Política #Realidade #Desigualdade (translated)

The Ebola epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has surpassed 4,000 deaths, making it the deadliest in the country's history, while the response to the crisis is hampered by insecurity and community resistance. #Ébola #RepúblicadaDemocráticaDoCongo #SaúdePública (translated)

Deltan Dallagnol stated that the TSE and the STF interfered in the election to protect Lula. According to him, Lula did not attend the last debate, and the Electoral Justice prohibited Globo from showing the candidate's empty podium and prevented the other participants from asking him questions. Dallagnol said that the decision led to the cancellation of the debate due to legal insecurity and deprived voters of the last opportunity to compare the candidates. He classified the judicial actions as biased and asked for the video to be shared. #Eleições2024 #Justiça #Lula (translated)

What led Globo to cancel the debate among the presidential candidates was not what it calls "legal insecurity", last-minute decisions by the Justice. It was the fact that Flávio Bolsonaro withdrew from attending to avoid facing Renan Santos. Globo had committed to Flávio not to invite Renan, which it could have done if it wanted to. Without Lula and without Flávio, the debate would have a laughable audience. #Brasil #Eleições2022 #DebatePolítico (translated)

According to the journalists from Globo, Lula should have passively accepted the trap of debating against four opponents at the same time. The fourth of these, Zema, entered through a court order that, curiously, generated no "legal insecurity" and did not violate the democratic process. Then, when Lula decided not to go to the debate, the format "one against all" turned into "all for one" and everything was fine. It was maintained! The game goes on! Long live democracy! Well. It only took the third place candidate in the polls, Renan Santos, to get a court order to ruin the end-of-year match between Flávio Bolsonaro and Friends of Flávio Bolsonaro, for the PL candidate to contradict himself (once again!) and withdraw from participation. Debate maintained? Not at all. What if Renan causes some embarrassment to Vorcaro's big brother, right? The network then canceled the debate and the narrative changed: "it's the end of the world!"; "it's the toga dictatorship!"; "legal interference!"; "never before in the history of this country!"... I understand. And I, naïve, thinking they were worried about the advertising budget of the BETs. #Lula #Democracia #Debate (translated)

Damn, they managed to cancel the Globo debate! Look at the level to which the legal insecurity of this country has reached! Anyone who still pretends this is a democracy has to get screwed. #democracia #insegurançaJurídica #debate (translated)

TV Globo on the CANCELLATION of the debate: "Globo has a long tradition in organizing electoral debates. Our purpose is to promote the discussion of ideas for Brazil. To offer voters the opportunity to compare projects. Our duty is to promote democracy. But the successive court decisions made moments before the debate causes legal uncertainty and represent an undue interference in the freedom that the media has to organize electoral debates. For this reason, Globo decided to cancel tonight's debate." #debate #democracia #eleições (translated)

"THE FORCE WING" DISTURBS THE GAME (ONCE AGAIN) TO BENEFIT LULA In the way it is, an inevitable question arises: what are the rules of this election? Every day there is a new court decision interfering in the electoral process. This generates insecurity and feeds a serious doubt: if Flávio Bolsonaro wins at the polls, will the result be respected or could new decisions alter the course of the election? The episode of the Globo Network debate is yet another example of this discussion. A tradition from previous elections - leaving the podium empty for an absent candidate - has become the object of a court decision. Not even defining as a parameter for a high-level debate that the candidate's party has robust representation in the National Congress is respected anymore. It is also legitimate to question whether the same criteria adopted in 2022 are being applied in 2026. In the last election, for example, Jair Bolsonaro was prevented from streaming live from his official residence, as it was decided that this violated the equality of the race between candidates. Today, Lula gives live interviews to television channels from that same location. Regardless of who is the benefited or harmed candidate, democracy demands clear, predictable, and equal rules for all. When the rules change during the game, trust in the already moribund institutions is once again stabbed. And no democracy can treat this as something normal. In this way, it is better for the "Force Wing" of the STF to soon declare the winner of this and future elections. #Eleições2026 #Democracia #Justiça (translated)