Search

Dr. Nina Kojima wrote that it was justified to express dissatisfaction and distrust towards the political direction of RTV Slovenia and to call for a fundamental reform of the public service. She expected the government to implement the reform differently than former Prime Minister Golob, who had announced a "cleaning of RTV Janšism." She added that she was the first on the list herself. Kojima accused former Minister of Culture Asta Vrečko of not protecting her, even though, according to her, RTV Slovenia fell under the jurisdiction of the ministry. She wrote that Vrečko, based on the information she had, was looking forward to the list of those who were laid off. She claimed that they were politically removed, sidelined, and harmed, also describing the insulting attitude towards them. She emphasized that the abolition of the RTV fee would not in itself mean the reform for which, in her view, strategy, effort, and determination were needed. According to her, Slovenia needs a national media that serves the public, reports according to fundamental journalistic principles, and prioritizes facts over comments from ideological speakers. Kojima also wrote that she had lived and grown up with RTV for at least four decades and that the employees were mostly creative, hardworking, and decent intellectuals. Before the referendum, she urged people to consider the consequences of past layoffs for individuals, children, and families. She expressed a wish that she and her family would be among the few affected, and that her former colleagues and their families would not have to endure similar experiences. In conclusion, she called for a public service and government that would act virtuous and not vindictively. #Slovenija #RTV #javniservis (translated)

Vasja labeled the referendum debate on RTV as a clear example of why RTV should be abolished. He wrote that journalists, in his opinion, do not understand that their role is to moderate and present diverse opinions, not to participate in the discussion or highlight positions they agree with or from which they have financial benefits. #RTV #referendum #novinarstvo (translated)

Jana Gržinič wrote that a member of the RTV management publicly supported 4XPROTI, and the president of the RTV Council was said to have participated in campaigns for this option. She added that RTV journalists participated in a protest against the government, and the next day prepared reports that they presented as independent. She believed that despite this, they are declared independent and professional, and argued that there are no similar cases elsewhere in Europe. In this context, she expressed support for the 4XZA option. #RTV #protest #neodvisnost (translated)

Bojan Požar stated in a post for Požareport that five journalists, together with Tamara Vonto, abused the investigative commission according to his words. He labeled the journalists with insults, and in the post, he also criticized the Police and the National Assembly. #novinarji #preiskava #Slovenija (translated)

Polona Rifelj asked why journalists do not ask specific individuals for their payroll and the amount of taxes paid in response to claims that foreigners in Slovenia pay taxes. If she is the owner or director of a company, they would also be interested in its operations, the taxes paid on profits, and any potential blockades, executions, or criminal charges. They should also ask her if she receives child benefits and in what amount, whether she pays for kindergarten, whether she lives in a non-profit apartment and under what conditions, and what kind of car she drives based on reported income, she noted. According to her, the answers would show whether she respects the Slovenian legal order, fulfills tax obligations, and under what conditions she benefits from a system that has been funded by taxpayers for decades. They should also show whether she deserves the right to vote, she added. #Slovenija #Davki #Novinarstvo (translated)

Jože Možina wrote that he refused to grant clemency to Rosvita Pesek and expected professional responsibility from her. He claimed that RTV Slovenia did not report impartially during the four years of litigation in the dispute between him and Svetlana Makarovič, and that the segment in the show Odmevi omitted his key arguments and recorded statement. Možina stated that the public was presented with a distorted image of the reasons for his lawsuit, as specific insults that are the subject of the dispute were not mentioned, in his words. He added that the events were accurately reported by other media, including POP TV, Siol, Domovina, Planet TV, Info360, Nova24, N1, Slovenske novice, and Delo. He also referred to the position of the Association of Journalists and Publicists. He criticized the response of the host of Odmevi, Rosvita Pesek, and editor of the show, Aleš Malerič, and assessed that a correction and an apology would be appropriate. He emphasized that he is seeking judicial protection to defend his good name, the freedom of the journalistic profession, and the culture of communication. #Novinarstvo #Mediji #Slovenija (translated)

Rok Ravnikar accused RTV Slovenia of not fulfilling its mission of balanced reporting and presenting different views. He wrote that more than which side it supports, he is concerned about the loss of space for the exchange of opinions and confrontation in a democratic republic. He compared two television debates. Last November, during the referendum on euthanasia, he participated in a debate where, according to him, the time was evenly divided between supporters and opponents. There were supposed to be considerably more opponents, so each was given about 45 seconds, while supporters had two minutes each. In a debate about one of the four current referendums, they announced that each participant would get 40 seconds. Ravnikar asked why RTV Slovenia changed the criteria for time distribution, as the same time for each side and the same time for each speaker with a different number of participants would mean a different ratio between the sides. He added that as an active citizen, he expects a response from the journalistic, media, and legal professions. In this context, he cited the stance of Levitsky and Ziblatt from the book *How Democracies Die?*, that changing the rules to one's own benefit and to the detriment of opponents is characteristic of authoritarian regimes. #mediji #demokracija #poročašnje (translated)

More than 2000 words blame how the public @rtvslo does not fulfill its mission of balanced reporting and presenting different views. You cannot make a bigger anti-ad. And it is the least important which side I support - what worries and saddens me the most is that as a democratic republic we are losing the space for exchange and confrontation. Why do you think of the "others" as so stupid? When did the attitude towards the "others" change so much? Yes, I ask you, who prepare the program. I understand, you have your own agenda and your own views, but in a democratic community mutual respect is a fundamental value. Twenty years ago, I worked as a PR person in politics. Even then, we knew who belonged where and which uncle from the background had more influence. But I felt that those of us on the ground, who were in direct contact – journalists, editors, and PR people – respected each other on a professional level. When I participated in a debate last November about the referendum on euthanasia, the time was evenly divided between the "FOR" side and the "AGAINST" side. There were significantly more opponents at that time, so each of us got, if I remember correctly, 45 seconds. Most barely managed to present one thought. On the other side, the supporters had two minutes. There were also some pretty bizarre embarrassments, as some could not come up with enough arguments for a two-minute speech. Last night, I heard an introductory announcement at a debate about one of the four current referendums that each speaker would get 40 seconds. Seriously? So back then equal time for both sides, now equal time for each speaker. These are different criteria, which with a different number of participants also mean a different distribution of time between both sides. Why did you change the criterion? I am just an active citizen, I expect that the journalistic, media, and legal professions will provide their criticism and assessment. "Changing the rules to your advantage and adjusting the conditions to the detriment of opponents is one of the basic characteristics of authoritarian powers." (Levitsky & Ziblatt: How democracies die?) #demokracija #mediji #poročanje (translated)

Yes. For me, who comes from the left center, it is also a sad fact that all opinion leaders of the "left" and journalists, who also rank on the left, hide in silence when something much less offensive is said by @ZanMahnic, while everyone screams until exhaustion. #bljak (translated)

Vidim in mi povedo, da se vrši medijski pritisk kjer nekateri novinarji dobesedno prosjačijo za izjave NVO, ki resnično delajo v korist državljanov. Ti se nimajo kaj bati. Ja pa grdo, da se za njimi skrivajo tiste NVO ki za narod ne naredijo nič ampak samo zase! Tem bomo vzeli. #mediji #NVO #državljani

No, @SasoDolenc včasih res zapiše popolne neumnosti. Po tej njegovi logiki novinarska zvrst imenovana “intervju” sploh v praksi ne bi mogla obstajati, ker bi - po Dolenčevo - morali novinarji sproti “preverjati” izrečeno v intervjujih, pred objavami. Skratka, vse intervjuje bi morali po uredniško cenzurirati. Kako to početi pri intervjujih v živo, verjetno ve samo Dolenc. Ni pa to očital @TarcaRTVSLO, ko je intervjuvala Smodeja, ker je bil Dolenc takrat očitno zadovoljen z odgovori - Smodeja. 🤣 #novinarstvo #intervju #kritika

Novinarji niso ravno državotvorni, kot opažam. Vseskozi poslušam "Janševa vlada to, Janševa vlada ono..", kot da imamo več vlad. Dragi novinarji, prosim vas, začnite uporabljati "SLOVENSKA VLADA", saj imamo samo eno! Vlado smo izvolili Slovenci na volitvah in zato je to naša, slovenska vlada! #Slovenija #vlada #novinarstvo

🙈Tega v Sloveniji ne priznaš rad, ker te takoj obtožijo, da si sentimentalen. Pa bom vseeno. 🇸🇮Ta teden sem bil v Berlinu ponosen, da sem Slovenec. Ganjen. In šokiran, ko sem seštel, koliko slovenskega znanja stoji na največjem tehnološkem sejmu na svetu. Ne v kotu. Na glavnem odru. Spomnite se leta 2018. Kitajci kupijo Gorenje. Vsa Slovenija je modrovala ob kavi. Vsak je vedel, kako se to konča. Poberejo znanje, zaprejo halo, premogovnik se tako ali tako zapira, Velenje pa ostane s spomini in praznimi bloki. Tudi sam sem to mislil. Priznam. Modroval sem ob kavi kot vsi. Potem pa prideš v Berlin, v dvorano 23, kjer ima Hisense eno največjih stojnic na sejmu. Kitajska korporacija, 180 trgov, prva na svetu pri velikanskih televizorjih. Globalna tiskovna konferenca, novinarji z vseh celin, kamere, prevajalci, cel svet gleda. In Kitajci so ključe tega odra dali Slovencem. Ne sponzorsko, ne za lepo fotografijo za domači tisk. Zaupali so nam, da vodimo šov. Na oder stopi Boštjan Pečnik iz Velenja. Za njim vodja razvoja. Naš. Vodja marketinga za Evropo. Naš. Vodja umetne inteligence. Naš. Luči, oder, režijo je naredilo slovensko podjetje. Kavo mi je skuhal Slovenec. Od prvega stavka na odru do zadnjega grižljaja. Ena največjih tehnoloških korporacij na svetu je svojo največjo evropsko predstavo zaupala mestu z manj kot 35.000 prebivalci. Ob kavi bi rekli, da to ni mogoče. Ampak tisto, kar me je zares zadelo, se ni zgodilo na odru. Zgodilo se je pri pečici. Tam sta stali Špela in Klavdija, dve mladi inženirki, ki sta napisali program za peko pizze. Ne marketing, ne hostesi. Onidve sta ta program spisali, testirali, popravljali, dokler ni bil pravi. In potem sta pekli. S savinjskim naglasom in brez pretiravanja: daleč najboljša pizza, kar sem jih jedel. Ne na sejmu. Kjerkoli. Nemec ob meni je vzel tretji kos in nehal spraševati o vatih. Malo naprej Anže. Pomivalni stroji. Sva se pol ure pogovarjala o sistemih šob. Pol ure! Kje je voda premočna, kje prešibka, zakaj so tale kot spremenili za 3 stopinje in kaj se je zgodilo s kozarci, ko so ga poskusili drugače. Pa Jasmina, ki mi je razložila, kako pečica sploh deluje in kako se zanjo razvija programska oprema. Ne na pamet, ampak tako, da sem razumel, zakaj moj kruh doma ni tak, kot bi moral biti, in kaj so oni naredili, da bo. Vsi Slovenci. Mladi. Izobraženi. In navdušeni. Ne tisto naučeno navdušenje s sejmov, ampak pravo, tisto, ko človek govori o svojem delu in pozabi, da je pred njim novinar. Eden od njih mi je mimogrede rekel, da ima najboljšo službo na svetu. In takrat veš, da firma nekaj dela prav. Ker to je stavek, ki ga ne moreš kupiti. Ni ga v nobenem sporočilu za javnost. Pove ga samo mlad inženir, ki zjutraj rad pride v službo. Zdaj pa seštejmo 1+1. 450 inženirjev v Velenju, ki razvijajo kuhinjske in premijske aparate za ves svet. Ne za Slovenijo, za svet. Za Ameriko, Avstralijo, Azijo. 4,8 milijarde evrov prihodkov Hisense Europe lani. 65 milijonov vložka samo v letu 2025. 9.600 ljudi v Evropi. To niso lepe besede za domači tisk. To je 450 plačilnih list v mestu, kjer se zapira premogovnik in ki smo mu pred 8 leti pisali nekrolog. Ja, vem. Odločitve padejo v Qingdau, ne v Šaleški dolini. Leta 2020 so odpuščali. Kuhinja, ki sama ve, kaj skuhati, bo v tvojem stanovanju s tistim usmerjevalnikom od Telekoma še malo počakala. Vse res. Ampak to so opombe pod črto. Ironija pa je, da je moral priti Kitajec, da nam je povedal, kar 30 let govorimo na okroglih mizah in ob kavi, pa nikoli ne naredimo. Da imamo pamet. Da imamo inženirje. Da znanje ni slogan, ampak plačilna lista in najboljša pizza na svetu. V Qingdau so to ugotovili prej kot v Ljubljani. Zato še enkrat, pa naj me obtožijo, česar hočejo. Ponosen. Ganjen. Šokiran. Velenje je stalo na glavnem odru v Berlinu in vodilo šov za cel svet. Vprašanje je samo, kdaj bo to opazila Slovenija. Ali pa bomo še naprej modrovali ob kavi. #Slovenija #Tehnologija #Inženirstvo

Žalostno je, da 5 Jenulovih lakajev dobi večjo medijsko pozornost kot premierji vlad, predsedniki držav ter stotine strokovnjakov in diplomatov, tako z leve kot desne strani političnega spektra. Bled strateški forum je povezovalen dogodek, namenjen resnim razpravam o najpomembnejših vprašanjih našega časa. Žal pa ga nekateri novinarji in klovni brez kakršnekoli družbene teže spreminjajo v cirkus ter s tem razvrednotijo tudi strokovnost in pomen takšnega dogodka. To bi morala biti glavna tema, o kateri bi morala razpravljati strokovna javnost. Kako je mogoče, da je na dogodku, kjer sodelujejo voditelji držav, številni strokovnjaki in diplomati, glavna novica nekaj protestnikov? Ampak ne. Pri nas je očitno pomembneje, kaj počne Jaša Jenul. In prav to je žalosten odraz dela slovenskega medijskega prostora. #Beda #Mediji #Politika #Slovenija

Nova24 seveda ni objektiven medij. Ampak svoj bedast in nekvaliteten novinarski produkt izdelujejo z zasebnim denarjem in jaz kot državljan imamo izbiro njim dat denar ali pa ne. In vsakič se odločim, da jim ga ne dam. Za razliko od RTV, ki je isto sranje kot Nova24, kjer mi država na silo vzame denar, zato da "novinarji" tam izvajajo komunistično propagando. Propaganda me ne moti, moti me propaganda na moj račun. #mediji #novinarstvo #propaganda

Roman Jeglič, razvpiti nekdanji "udbovc", ki je bil partner od tiste Rusinje, prijateljice od @nmusar, živi sedaj v Ukancu v Bohinju, pa ga "(ne)raziskovalni" novinarji @RTV_Slovenija, @24UR @24ur_com, @SpletnaMladina... ne znajo najti! Vse za Natašo!!! https://t.co/WcyClUs212 #Novinarstvo #Slovenija #Bohinj