Mats Uotila wrote that Finland has often been said to be larger than its size in the EU. He reminded that the previous government had spent billions to avoid reputational damage and noted that Finland's reputation was bright. Uotila asked if this could be used to combat the bottle deposit regulation, which he called unnecessary. According to him, the regulation would cost Finland 675 million euros. #EU #politiikka #kestävyys (translated)
Peltsi Peltola asked what consequences Finland might face if it did not comply with the changes planned by the EU and continued with the current bottle return system. He criticized the changes and assessed that they could ruin a functioning system. He also asked what would happen if Finland disregarded any possible sanctions. Peltola used a derogatory term for the changes. #EU #Suomi #pullonpalautus (translated)
The author found the idea an incomprehensible setback and believed that Finland's well-functioning bottle return system was reverting to an old-world model. #kierrätys #pullonpalautus #ympäristö #FI (translated)
Ei kai me ihan kaikessa EU:ta totella? Eivät muutkaan maat tottele. Miksi me olemme niin säälittävän kuuliaisia, kuin olisimme jotain tahdotonta orjakansaa? Meillä on jo hyvä pullonpalautusjärjestelmä. #EU #Politiikka #Yhteiskunta
