Search

Jari Mäkäräinen criticized Sanna Ukkola's writing about the Prime Minister's meeting with Imam Sharmarke Said Aw-Mussen. According to Mäkäräinen, Ukkola regarded the meeting as ordinary work and believed that the imam, who was born in Turku, was being asked impossible questions regarding Sharia. Mäkäräinen argued that asking the imam was not a misunderstanding: in his view, the imam left open whether Sharia would be applied in Finland in family or criminal law matters. Mäkäräinen wrote that, according to him, freedom of religion did not justify the establishment of a parallel legal system alongside Finnish laws. He claimed that in Muslim-majority countries, freedom of religion, women's equality, and individual rights were not realized in liberal democracies due to Islamic doctrine and Sharia. He cited Lebanon as an example, where he believed the growth of the Muslim population and political organization undermined previous balance and led to civil war. In France, Sweden, Belgium, and Britain, he mentioned the visibility of parallel societies, honor-based violence, segregation of areas and schools, and pressure to accept practices related to Sharia. In Finland in the 2000s, Mäkäräinen claimed that groups with a Muslim background who had immigrated were connected to the overrepresentation of sexual offenses, unemployment, use of social security, and demands for their own rules. He believed that distinguishing criticism of Islam from calls for deportation did not make questions about Sharia suspect. According to Mäkäräinen, the primacy of the Finnish Constitution and criminal law should be clear in all matters, and Finland did not need to repeat the experiences of countries where the application of Sharia had been tried. https://t.co/bGpZ7VaTux #uskonnonvapaus #integratio #muslimit (translated)

Rami Kurimo wrote that the flags of Palestine and the Soviet Union were flying in France. He asked what this indicated about the riots in France and the Palestine movement, and mentioned sources like Instagram and the New York Times. https://t.co/RWuJSHVUkI #Palestiina #Ranska #Mellakat (translated)

A more than 10 billion euro artificial intelligence investment is being planned in Jämsä, which the French company Sesterce intends to implement on the site of the former Kaipola paper mill, employing around 2000 people during the construction phase and using Finnish contractors. #tekoäly #investointi #Jämsä (translated)

Jämsä may receive an investment of over 10 billion euros from the French artificial intelligence infrastructure company Sestercel, which could create about 300 permanent jobs and provide a significant economic boost to the area, but the success of the project still requires several decisions to be made. #Jämsä #Tekoäly #Investoinnit (translated)

Venla Manninen wrote that, in her opinion, there was evidence presented regarding the effects of mass immigration on Western countries and that the situation in Germany, France, and Britain, as well as statistics on sexual crimes, unemployment benefits, prisoners, and gangs could not be ignored. She believed that the differences between parties were evident in how willing they were to address the problems of immigration. According to Manninen, the Finns Party was the only credible party to solve these issues. She criticized the green-left for focusing on multiculturalism and stated that the Social Democrats had voted against nearly all of the government's immigration tightening measures. She also highlighted the border security law, claiming that six social democrats, including the party's vice-chairman, voted against it. Manninen criticized the Centre Party for its lack of direction and noted that the party had announced it was aiming for 40,000 net immigrants per year in this electoral term. She described the National Coalition Party as contradictory: according to her, the party spoke about deporting criminals while simultaneously wanting tens of thousands of immigrants for low-wage jobs. Manninen argued that only a small portion of labor immigrants found employment in jobs requiring special skills and that nearly all directed towards low-wage sectors. Manninen believed that the Finns Party was advancing Finland's and the Finns' interests and dared to say things that, in her opinion, other parties did not acknowledge. However, she pointed out that no party could change laws on its own. She stated that without the Finns Party in government, concrete legislative actions would not be taken to address immigration issues, and instead, tightening measures might be lifted and rules loosened. #maahanmuutto #Suomi #politiikka (translated)

Jari Sarasvuo wrote that people retired early and the income of retirees was higher than that of the employed. He asked whether the situation of a France-sized country living on the funds of future generations could inevitably draw other countries into an approaching crisis. #eläke #tulo #kriisi (translated)

A young Finnish person grumbled that more people were once again on their way to Europe, whom he ironically referred to as "French students." He said the situation would not end without being stopped and demanded borders. https://t.co/A9MMPonRPZ #opiskelijat #Eurooppa #rajat (translated)

Riku-Mikael Leppänen asked how France could be in financial trouble, even though in his opinion it had taken in many skilled workers from Africa and the Middle East. He wondered whether immigration should have improved the dependency ratio and economic development compared to other countries. Leppänen also asked how Poland's economy could grow explosively without immigration from the third world. #talous #maahanmuutto #Ranska (translated)

Mikko Välimaa wrote that he had been thinking about Europe as French schools reopened. According to him, Europe has stressed the control of the past for 80 years, and in Germany, it has become a state religion. Välimaa claimed that this has produced a senseless world, where, in his view, immature teenagers glorified the Islamists terrorists of Bataclan. #Eurooppa #historia #koulutus (translated)

The Bureaucrat of the Day wrote that the art treasures of the Louvre should be moved to safety from France. He mentioned that he had omitted words prohibited by censorship laws from his text and predicted that a crowd could someday burn the museum and destroy the cultural heritage accumulated over centuries. He estimated that art might later be destroyed under the guidance of religious rules and considered that moving it was necessary to prevent damage. #taide #kulttuuriperintö #Ranska (translated)

Dystocracy wrote that they found the news about the far-left riots coming from France ideologically unpleasant and described that Yle provided in contrast a panic news story about raccoons for the day. They sarcastically hinted that this time the entity labeled as Nazis was Åland. https://t.co/yfG3fXc4Kb https://t.co/HR4esUK4F5 #Suomi #uutiset #politiikka (translated)