Josef Franz Lindner

Josef Franz Lindner wrote that Jun had introduced a penalized cease-and-desist declaration in connection with a secret election as a representative. Lindner saw a constitutional issue in this and asked whether Jun, as a member of a constitutional court, really did not recognize this. #Verfassungsrecht #Wahlrecht #Unterlassungserklärung (translated)

Josef Franz Lindner wrote that, 81 years after Auschwitz, a document on dealing with anti-Semitism is being drafted in Berlin to form a government. He described Berlin as the city of the "Final Solution" and the process as shocking on many levels. #Antisemitismus #Berlin #Geschichte (translated)

Josef Franz Lindner wrote that the CDU is moving towards its political end without clear language and concept. It offers no resistance and shows no will to survive but allows developments to happen, he stated. A saying from Munich summarized his assessment that everything is indifferent anyway. #CDU #Politik #Deutschland (translated)

Josef Franz Lindner said that Ricarda Lang's Greens have clearly shifted to the left under Dröge. Dröge has aligned the party for a possible coalition with the Left and far-left forces in 2029. This means that the Greens are no longer an option for people who prefer centrist politics, Lindner argued. In addition, he interpreted Dröge's positioning as a rejection of Robert Habeck and his bourgeois demeanor. This has a political power flavor. According to Lindner, Hendrik Wüst and Daniel Günther should also evaluate who they are coalitioning with. #Grüne #Politik #Koalition (translated)

Josef Franz Lindner described a minority government as the last chance for Friedrich Merz and the CDU. He wrote that Merz could not implement the necessary structural reforms in his view with the SPD and was dependent on the smaller coalition partner. Therefore, he should dismiss the SPD ministers from the government and form a CDU single-party government. Lindner suggested that reasonable members from other parties could support their initiatives. If decisions were only made with the votes of the AfD, he believed that the Greens and SPD would bear the responsibility if they voted against it for tactical or ideological reasons. Merz would neither have to pursue AfD policies nor agree to AfD proposals; agreements with the party were not necessary. Therefore, he also did not see a trap constructed by Robin Alexander and no obstacle from the "firewall." According to Lindner, a minority government would make political responsibility visible and was also important with regard to the elections in 2029. If Merz achieved too little with it, he could pose the question of confidence and thus trigger new elections. In his estimation, Merz and the CDU would regain support as a result. #CDU #Minderheitsregierung #Politik (translated)

AfD ban? Regardless of the (in my view low) chances of success of a petition to the Federal Constitutional Court, important questions are completely ignored by the proponents: (1) A ban procedure would take at least 3 years: do we really want to talk only about the AfD for so long? (2) How should a ban petition be communicated to the population, who supports the AfD party by up to 30 percent and in some states even more, without finally tearing the country apart politically? That would have to be "explained" to the people. (3) The next federal election in 2029 would take place before a decision by the Federal Constitutional Court. One cannot seriously assume that the Federal Constitutional Court would exclude the AfD from the federal election by interim order before a decision on the ban petition. So how should a federal election go ahead during an ongoing ban procedure? (4) How do you communicate to foreign countries that precisely in Germany the largest opposition party is to be banned? All these questions are not being discussed. Because there are no answers. Not even Hape Kerkeling. #AfD #Politik #Deutschland (translated)

Die politischen Verhältnisse sortieren sich allmählich. Die Grünen entscheiden sich - wenig überraschend - für strammlinks. Die SPD tendenziell wohl auch. Ganz rechts steht isoliert die AfD. Die CDU verschwindet mit programmatisch-politischer Leere (Hauptsache die Medien und die NGOs mögen uns) mit einem handlungsunfähigen Kanzler im Nirwana der Mitte und folgt der FDP (hard to say) auf dem Weg in die Bedeutungslosigkeit. Eine neue bürgerliche Partei ist nicht in Sicht. Jeder kann sich ausmalen, worauf das hinausläuft. #Politik #Deutschland #Wahlen

"Ethnische Säuberung". Das gehört zu den härtesten Vorwürfen, die man im politischen Raum erheben kann. Nicht nur historisch, sondern auch verfassungsrechtlich, denn eine solche Politik wäre eine offensichtliche und schwere Verletzung der Menschenwürde (und würde auch für ein Parteiverbot reichen). Wenn der Kanzler diesen Vorwurf im Bundestag erhebt, muss er ihn auch konkret, belastbar und zurechenbar belegen können. Darum sollte man den Kanzler jetzt bitten. Das wäre eine Aufgabe kritischer Journalisten. #Menschenwürde #Politik #Journalismus

Polizeigewerkschafter Hüber (bis 1989 bei den DDR-Grenztruppen) scheint im rechtsstaatlichen Verfassungs- und Beamtenrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland noch nicht angekommen zu sein. Er verbreitet gefährliche Halbwahrheiten und sollte sich mäßigen. #Rechtsstaat #Deutschland #Gesetzgebung

Wegzug. Jeder Deutsche hat das grundrechtliche verbürgte Recht, das Land ohne Angaben von Gründen zu verlassen (Art. 2 Abs. 1 GG). Auch das EU-Recht gewährt diese Freizügigkeit. Eine "Wegzugssteuer" (was für ein Begriff!) oder Ähnliches darf jedenfalls nicht so ausgestaltet sein, dass sie prohibitiven, knebelnden Charakter gewinnt. Der Staat darf weder eine physische noch eine finanzielle "Mauer" errichten, um seine Bürger im Land zu halten. #Freiheit #Recht #EU

Stoppt die Wokeokraten! Also diejenigen, die bestimmen wollen, wer was wann wo wie sagen darf, ohne moralische Verunglimpfung und strafrechtliche Verfolgung zu riskieren. Dieses moderne Jakobinertum verträgt sich nicht mit den Grundwerten des Grundgesetzes. #Woke #Freiheit #Grundrechte