Search

Yvonne Kussmann reported, citing the spokesperson for the Ministry of the Interior of Baden-Württemberg, that the 27-year-old Afghan entered Germany in December 2015 and applied for asylum. The BAMF rejected the application in January 2018 and threatened deportation to Afghanistan. A lawsuit by the man was dismissed by the administrative court in July 2021. Since then, he has been subject to enforceable deportation. Because deportations to Afghanistan were suspended from August 2021, he initially remained in Germany. After the federal government, under Interior Minister Dobrindt, organized regular deportations to Afghanistan again and obtained replacement documents more frequently, the government presidency of Karlsruhe initiated a passport procurement procedure for the man. His identity had been unclear until then. In early October, the local regulatory office delivered him a letter asking him to report to the General Consulate of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan in mid-October. This did not happen. It is still unclear whether this is related to the incident in the Tuttlingen town hall, where the man appeared with a firearm and was shot by police officers after allegedly firing at them first, Kussmann wrote. According to Kussmann, the man had been convicted in Germany of bodily harm, trespassing, property damage, theft, and threats, resulting in fines. From October 2025 to April 2026, he served a substitute prison sentence. He was not registered with the special unit for dangerous foreigners in Baden-Württemberg. #Tuttlingen #Asylrecht #InnereSicherheit (translated)

Yvonne Kussmann reported, citing the Südwest Presse, that a 27-year-old Afghan appeared at the town hall in Tuttlingen with a weapon and was subsequently shot by the police. Before that, he had applied for a fiction certificate there, which could serve as proof of legal residence for asylum seekers during an ongoing asylum procedure. The document was not issued to him; after that, he was removed from the building. Kussmann wrote that the man then returned with a weapon. The reason why the certificate was not issued was initially unclear. The 27-year-old was known to the police and in the city for psychological disturbances, she wrote. She announced that she would submit an inquiry regarding the case. Kussmann compared the incident to the attack in Illerkirchberg: A 27-year-old Eritrean had attacked 14-year-old Ece and her friend with a knife on the morning of December 5, 2022, as they passed by the accommodation of Okba B. on their way to the school bus. The man wanted to go to the district office to kill staff of the immigration authority because they had not issued him a travel document. Kussmann wrote that he assumed the girls had seen his knife and would notify the police. Ece was so severely injured that she died two hours later in the hospital; her friend was able to escape after the first attack and survived with serious injuries. Kussmann wrote that the case in Tuttlingen ended differently and did not require any uninvolved victims. #Tuttlingen #Asylrecht #Gewaltprävention (translated)

This is definitely disproportionate, this is definitely unconstitutional and contrary to European law. Thilo Weichert, board member of the German Association for Data Protection, sees the draft as a "blank check for the administration to use AI in the migration sector." #KünstlicheIntelligenz #Asylrecht #Datenschutz (translated)

A planned law in Germany is supposed to allow authorities to train artificial intelligence with sensitive asylum and visa data, which is criticized due to unclear provisions and possible discrimination against those affected. #KünstlicheIntelligenz #Asylrecht #Datenschutz (translated)

News: Westphalian Peace Prize for the military alliance NATO, rapid response force for "combating refugee flows" like in CEUTA, abolition of individual asylum rights, 2x lethal dose of a poison syringe in the attempted execution of a woman in the USA mad world. #NATO #Asylrecht #Flüchtlingskrise #US #ES #NATO (translated)

After the Federal Prosecutor's Office announced yesterday that a Kuwait-born suspected IS fighter was arrested in Hesse and a Syrian suspected war criminal was arrested in Rhineland-Palatinate, I made a press inquiry. I wanted to know when the suspects entered Germany, whether they applied for asylum, and what residence status they had at and after entry as well as what they currently have. I also wanted to know whether the suspects had previously been known to the police for similar crimes or violent offenses or had a criminal record. Shortly after that, I received a call from a spokesperson for the Federal Prosecutor, who informed me that they did not want to provide any further information due to the protection of the suspects' personal rights. I took note of this and wrote a rebuttal, citing the necessary weighing between the public's interest in information and the specific, worthy interests of the affected suspects. I pointed out that my questions 1-3 exclusively concern the stay of the suspects in Germany, withdrew the fourth question (because one can argue here with the presumption of innocence and personal rights), and requested answers to questions 1-3. Lastly, I asked to at least name the year of entry and answer the question about the asylum application if more detailed responses are not possible. In case no response is given, I requested confirmation of the refusal to provide information as well as a concrete justification. I received the response earlier via email, see screenshot. They concluded, after weighing "all possible aspects," that the personal rights of a suspected IS fighter and a suspected war criminal, who is accused of executing three people with a close-range headshot, weigh more heavily than the legitimate public interest in knowing how long the suspects have been in Germany and whether they entered the country as asylum seekers. Well then. This does not correspond to my understanding of transparency. In this context, I would like to point out that you can also support my work. Any support helps to make research, court visits, on-site appointments, technical costs, and the further expansion of my portal Current Information possible. Unfortunately, at the moment, the costs are higher than the revenue. I would therefore be very pleased and grateful for any support. You can do that here: https://t.co/0RvVD8whhG https://t.co/0RvVD8whhG #Transparenz #Pressefreiheit #Asylrecht (translated)

Experten und eine Richterin des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts weisen darauf hin, dass das neue Arbeitsverbot für Asylsuchende in Österreich EU-rechtswidrig ist und die restriktive Vorgehensweise des AMS existenzielle Probleme für die Betroffenen mit sich bringt. #Flüchtlinge #Asylrecht #Arbeitsverbot

Resul H. sorgt seit fast zehn Jahren für Aufsehen in Deutschland, nachdem sein Asylantrag abgelehnt wurde und er trotz ausstehender Ausreisepflicht verdächtigt wird, einen Brandanschlag auf die Wuppertaler Synagoge verübt zu haben, während seine wahre Identität und Herkunft weiterhin unklar bleiben. #Asylrecht #Synagoge #Wuppertal

Was ich in den Schlagzeilen vermisse: Österreicher gründet Institut für Remigration in Magdeburg. CDU stimmt mit der AfD gegen Stolpersteine in Heidenau. Sachsens CDU Innenminister will Grundrecht auf Asyl streichen. Dieser Linksextremismus ist aber auch echt furchtbar. /s #Politik #Migration #Asylrecht

Fakt ist: Mehr als 98% der "Flüchtlinge" haben nach Artikel 16a Grundgesetz KEIN Grundrecht auf Asyl in Deutschland. Der Staat könnte die illegale Migration also ganz grundrechtskonform beenden, der Staat will nicht (und stellt sich lieber dumm)... https://t.co/PZo1w0DqTL #Asylrecht #Migration #Deutschland