Search

Jonathan Krispijn wrote that Soundos had rejected the far-right in a rough manner. According to him, it ensured that people no longer listened when everyone who was critical of immigration was labeled as far-right. #soundos #immigratie #politiek #debat #nederland https://t.co/bo9V5O3qMU #immigratie #politiek #debat (translated)

Forum for Democracy asked what the House of Representatives was occupied with and stated that it was not about solving the housing crisis, sending back immigrants, or lowering taxes, but about raising the rainbow flag. The party said that Tom Russcher had reacted to the situation. https://t.co/i40ShroMHg #TweedeKamer #Woningnood #Immigratie (translated)

Jonathan Krispijn wrote that Geert Wilders again advocated for a Nexit, because according to Wilders, an opt-out for asylum and immigration would never come. Krispijn stated that Wilders had previously abandoned his Nexit positions, had been photographed with Zelensky, had acknowledged climate change, and had supported funding for Ukraine. He wondered who still believed Wilders. #wilders #nexit #pvv #politiek #nederland #nexit #wilders #politiek (translated)

"Since the beginning of the war, they have actually been in a very nice waiting room. But even if you are in a waiting room that is very comfortable, it remains a waiting room," says Mark Klaassen, a university lecturer in immigration law at Leiden University. #Oekraïne #Asiel #Vluchtelingen (translated)

Sywert van Lienden wrote that it was promised that the asylum influx would decrease, but according to him, another asylum seekers' center was being added. He wondered why 270 asylum seeker centers in the Netherlands were not sufficient. https://t.co/T0r9FImdK1 #asiel #AZC #immigratie (translated)

The author wrote that both people who received papers and those who did not stayed in the country. According to his estimates, there were 200,000 people without residence documents. In the best case, they ended up in the black market, according to the author; in the worst case, they were exploited by drug gangs and slum landlords. The author described that situation as inhumane. https://t.co/YbRCxRwLf7 #immigratie #mensenrechten #illegaal #NL (translated)

Michael van der Galien wrote that according to a poll by Maurice de Hond, 76 percent agreed with the statement that criminal people with a migration background should be required to return to their country of origin, compared to 18 percent who disagreed. He said that Geert Wilders had shared the results and that the left in the Netherlands subsequently criticized the polling method and the term 'allochtonen'. According to Van der Galien, the left did not want to hear the signal from the results; he argued that the people had spoken. https://t.co/tDAOZrUHfi #Nederland #politiek #immigratie (translated)

Flick asked if the Netherlands could also get a Trump and stated that the anti-immigration policy of the PVV was yielding results. He wrote that immigration from Islamic countries had decreased by 96 percent under Trump. https://t.co/kImELPIwjR #Trump #immigratie #PVV (translated)

Dr. Jan van de Beek wrote that the Syrian and Algerian interviewed by Nieuwsuur, in his opinion, should not be in the Netherlands and should not receive shelter. He stated that the Dutch did not offer help or shelter on a large scale and that most Dutch people did not want that. According to Van de Beek, asylum sheltering should stop in this way. https://t.co/bnL9FJvuxs #Asielbeleid #Immigratie #Nederland (translated)

Frank Peeters wrote that in the 1980s he was friends with a Hungarian and a Portuguese student at his school, who, according to him, spoke Dutch fluently after a few months. He also talked about an Iranian medical student who immediately took Dutch lessons and learned the language by translating texts from Persian via English. As a general practitioner with a diverse patient base, Peeters claimed to ask everyone to speak Dutch. He said he had no objection to diversity, but he did object to people who, in his opinion, did not speak Dutch after years in Belgium and mainly interacted with people from their country of origin. Peeters wrote that some called him extreme right because of his remarks on mass immigration, which he believed was made possible by the government. He said he sometimes felt like a stranger in his own country and felt that newcomers should adapt or leave. Finally, he asked if others shared that opinion. #Integratie #Diversiteit #Massaimmigratie (translated)

Dr. Jan van de Beek wrote that people, according to him, were not seeking a right-wing dictatorship, as left-wing politicians and media claimed. He stated that they actually wanted stricter asylum rules, protection against crime by immigrants, affordable energy, no new debts, and peace. They would also want social services for hard workers, rather than for illegal immigrants. https://t.co/NwB8l4z5it #AfD #Duitsland #Immigratie #Asielbeleid #Immigratie #Criminaliteit (translated)