Forum voor Democratie

Forum for Democracy asked what the Dutch had received in return for their decades-long hospitality. The party stated that they were faced with higher costs, decreasing safety, and a sense of alienation on the streets, and said it was time to reclaim the country. https://t.co/VNKfQS06HZ https://t.co/toSO92vUVW #Nederland #Gastvrijheid #Veiligheid (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the claim that a low VAT rate would cost the government a lot of money pretended as if the state earned the money and the workers took it away. The party called that reasoning the world upside down. #btwtarief #overheid #werkgelegenheid (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that successive cabinets had promised to solve the major problems of the Netherlands, but that the situation, according to the party, was deteriorating on all fronts. FVD senator Eric Kemperman stated that the same parties would make no difference and that a change in course was necessary. https://t.co/6MBE3h8c8Z #Politiek #Nederland #Verandering (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that according to the party, Dutch people had no objection to paying taxes if the rates were reasonable and the money was spent wisely. The established parties, according to the party, would not be able to meet those conditions. https://t.co/bBFjBubgPU #belasting #Nederland #politiek (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that the tax and benefits system was, according to the party, far too complex and that this explained the implementation problems at the Tax Authorities. The party reported that Biem Yati advocated for a tax-free allowance of €30,000 and a flat tax of 20%, which would largely render benefits unnecessary and make work more rewarding again. https://t.co/jcfzWr516R #belastingstelsel #toeslagen #economischbeleid (translated)

Forum for Democracy asked what the House of Representatives was occupied with and stated that it was not about solving the housing crisis, sending back immigrants, or lowering taxes, but about raising the rainbow flag. The party said that Tom Russcher had reacted to the situation. https://t.co/i40ShroMHg #TweedeKamer #Woningnood #Immigratie (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that saving and building wealth in the Netherlands should no longer be penalized, as taxes were already too high according to the party. Milan Schenk explained why FVD wanted to completely abolish box 3. https://t.co/QCYiCjXTqx #Belastingen #Vermogen #Spaarzaamheid (translated)

Forum for Democracy announced that the congress would take place on November 21 and that ticket sales would start soon. It stated that the event was only accessible to FVD members and urged non-members to join. https://t.co/VNKfQS0Exx https://t.co/JyAxG0Uqea #FVD #congres #lidmaatschap (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that approximately 140,000 Ukrainians in the Netherlands had a stalled asylum application because their stay was considered temporary. According to the party, the European Court had determined that those applications had to be processed nonetheless. FVD argued that this could extend the temporary stay and said that 43 percent did not want to return. The party believed that Ukrainians should return and reported that Tom Russcher had asked the minister questions about this. #Oekraïne #asiel #vluchtelingen (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that workers were being burdened more heavily, the budget deficit was rising, and interest charges were increasing, while the Minister of Finance in Bangkok was telling other countries how they should keep their budgets in order. The party said it preferred to see concrete measures rather than words, so that the Dutch would have more to spend again. #Financiën #Begroting #Economie (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the government was looking for new ways to collect taxes every year and that investors and savers were the next in line according to the party. The party advocated for the abolition of box 3, as it argued that taxes had already been paid on wealth, and called on readers to visit the linked website. https://t.co/VNKfQS0Exx! https://t.co/gkjEvijf2S #belasting #vermogen #FVD (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that other parties that took a critical stance towards the nitrogen policy mainly wanted to shift the burdens, for example by sparing farmers at the expense of Schiphol or the industry. The party stated that it wanted to eliminate the entire nitrogen policy. https://t.co/daSsWuiUuY #stikstofbeleid #FVD #milieu (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that communication between the cabinet and the European Commission would not need to be made public because it was informal. The party asked whether this was a smokescreen to make agreements with Brussels outside of democratic oversight. https://t.co/1HVTILheyO #democratie #transparantie #EU (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that CV installations would be banned from 2029 onwards and that households would therefore have to pay even more to heat their homes in winter. The party said it wanted to end the energy transition and called on people to contribute to its mission. https://t.co/VNKfQS06HZ https://t.co/7T9KZdVDWM #Energietransitie #CVinstallaties #Kosten (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that the increasing resistance against homeschooling needed to be countered. According to the party, homeschooling was the best form of education for many children and FVD wanted to protect that right. The party called for support of its mission via https://t.co/VNKfQS06HZ. https://t.co/VNKfQS06HZ https://t.co/0Z0AVO2Zn2 #Thuisonderwijs #Onderwijs #FVD (translated)

Forum for Democracy said it supported the motion from the VVD to reverse a small part of the planned tax increase in box 3, but felt that did not go far enough. The party advocated for the complete abolition of box 3, so that people would have the opportunity to build up wealth instead of continually paying taxes on it. #Box3 #Vermogen #Belasting (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the problems surrounding box 3 could be easily solved by abolishing the scheme. According to the party, this would simplify the tax system, prevent double taxation, reward saving, and promote financial independence. The party urged people to support FVD and presented it as a choice in the interest of their wallet. https://t.co/VNKfQS06HZ https://t.co/OQVNI751Oe #Belasting #Financiën #FVD (translated)

Forum for Democracy wrote that electricity would no longer be taken for granted according to the party if it were up to the cabinet. To relieve the overloaded power grid, new homes would need to be built 'smartly,' which, according to FVD, would affect energy security and make housing more expensive. The party also stated that Dutch households were facing costs of tens of thousands of euros due to the energy transition and said it wanted to stop this policy. According to FVD, Milan Schenk spoke during the question hour. #Energie #Huizen #Beleid (translated)

Forum for Democracy stated that the budget deficit should be addressed by cutting government spending that it deemed unnecessary, rather than by further increasing taxes. For FVD, the complete abolition of box 3 was the only just solution. The party called on people to protect their wallets. https://t.co/VNKfQS06HZ https://t.co/ifb3YcKKIR #Begrotingstekort #Belasting #Overheidsuitgaven (translated)