Search

Interest on interest wrote that the Center Party had formally closed the door to a government with M, KD, and L and could not accept SD even as a supporting party. At the same time, the writer believed that the party kept the door open for VPK as a supporting party. Interest on interest described VPK as an Islamist communist party and claimed that it supported Hamas, was hostile towards Jews, did not want to counteract the Muslim Brotherhood, and wanted to abolish the market economy and private ownership. The writer called the stance grotesque. #politik #Sverige #vårdomhärd (translated)

The author of the post stated that Raphael Glucksmann significantly won the left-wing socialist primaries for the presidential candidacy in 2027. He described him as a moderate leftist centrist who rejects Mélenchon, nationalisms, and Islamism, and labeled the result as good news for the French left. #Francie #sociálníprávo #politika #FR (translated)

Felix Perrefort reported that Tillschneider referred to Jewish culture as part of German culture when asked about the AfD's position on Jewish life in Saxony-Anhalt. He described it as deeply rooted for centuries and referenced evidence of Jewish communities since late antiquity. Furthermore, Tillschneider spoke of a German-Jewish cultural symbiosis and announced plans to hold conversations with representatives of the Jewish community. Perrefort wrote that Tillschneider's response had nothing to do with extremism or National Socialism. He believed that the accusations brought to the public by public broadcasting and government parties all the way to the Chancellery were lies. He also doubted that Steinmeier or Klingbeil would have responded similarly confidently and sympathetically, and without diversity clichés, and recommended the interview. #AfD #JüdischesLeben #Kultur (translated)

Keijo Kaarisade wrote that when condemning the oppression of women, it was agreed, in his opinion, to speak vaguely about religions and cultures without referring to Islam. He criticized that a member of the National Coalition Party had been assigned to the matter and they themselves had followed along, and said that he would have to explain the issue to the imam again with Petteri. https://t.co/bbPqxHiqBm #naistenoikeudet #uskonto #kulttuuri (translated)

Alex Vanopslagh wrote that Liberal Alliance's Mads Strange had asked a person who described himself as a conservative Muslim in the TV 2 program Højskolen on Wednesday if it was a problem that only 16 percent of Muslim men in Denmark believed that homosexuality was acceptable. According to Vanopslagh, the person rejected that it was a problem and would not answer what he personally thought about homosexuality. Vanopslagh wrote that he disagreed and considered homophobia to be among the least Danish things. He believed that Muslims could be Danish if they supported the fundamental values of democracy and had embraced Denmark. As a member of parliament, he claimed to have both the right and the duty to establish the requirements for Danish citizenship. He wrote that applicants should at a minimum acknowledge the precedence of Danish law over religious laws, an individual's right to make choices about his life, and equal rights for homosexuals. They should also not support Islamist regimes or terrorist movements. Therefore, Liberal Alliance would screen applicants and say no to individuals who had praised terrorism, supported Hamas or similar organizations, threatened people who left Islam, or acted hostile towards homosexuals, he wrote. Vanopslagh wrote that the government would reintroduce a bill on citizenship for 2,055 individuals. He referred to the government's own statement that applicants' values should be screened, but that the screening should not apply to the 2,055 individuals. According to him, this risked allowing Islamists, rabid anti-Semites, or anti-democrats to gain citizenship. Liberal Alliance would not vote for more citizenships until the screening was in place, Vanopslagh wrote. He described Danish citizenship as a gift rather than a right. #Danmark #Statsborgerskab #LiberalAlliance (translated)

Hannele Al-Hamzawi said she was a guest on the Kuuntelija podcast, where she discussed what she considers an incomprehensible mindset, in which those outside the Islamic community perceive their experiences with community members as truth, for example, through work or random encounters. https://t.co/67bQ5M9FID #Podcast #Islam #Yhteisö (translated)

Mika Merano wrote that he had observed that some people who consider themselves conscious held the view that opposing Islam was racism. He questioned this interpretation and wondered why a Finn who converted to Islam but still viewed it and its teachings as harmful to Western modern democracies would, in his view, be considered a racist towards another Finn. Merano stated that he did not understand the logic of this reasoning. #rasismi #islam #demokratia (translated)

Rubén Pulido wrote that Morocco had pardoned more than 74,000 people sentenced to prison in the last seven years and had granted amnesties to a growing number of terrorists. He also stated that those pardoned for Islamist terrorism had quadrupled in three years. https://t.co/VKHTuXPdQs #Marruecos #Amnistía #Terrorismo (translated)

Compound interest stated that a humorous explanation of the Left Party only became funny when it was based on something true. The author described the VPK as an Islamist communist party and called it the enemy of the people and an ally of evil in all conceivable and sometimes inconceivable forms. https://t.co/3sVPjPgp1a #politiktwitter #Vänsterpartiet #humor (translated)

Tuulia Alanko wrote that the imam's statement about Finnish law applying to Muslims did not, in her opinion, answer the question of the status of sharia law nor did it exclude the possibility of considering it important. She described the response as misleading. Alanko claimed that Aw-Musse had not distanced himself from sharia law or the idea of separate sharia courts in Finland. She suggested that this was related to both the imam's role and the fact that messages pleasing to Finns might be beneficial in the long term. According to Alanko, Aw-Musse could have directly stated that he did not want to replace Finnish laws with an Islamic legal system. Alanko finally referred to Jari Sarasvuo's statement that sharia or a parallel culture was not needed in Finland. #Suomi #Islam #Šaria (translated)

Hannu Järvinen asked the chairman of the SDP, Antti Lindtman, why the representatives of the SDP voted against the adoption of the resolution according to him. Järvinen wrote that the European Parliament had voted on Thursday in Strasbourg on a resolution condemning Islamist infiltration, which he claimed aimed to undermine European values, democratic institutions, and social cohesion. https://t.co/3w1bxuxAwT #suomi #politiikka #Eurooppa (translated)

The post’s author told MAGA supporters that Trump was funding what they described as a terror network involving Russia, North Korea and Iran’s Islamist regime. They said the victims in Ukraine were white European Christians, including men, women and children, and asked how that could be reconciled with supporters’ stated values. #MAGA #Trump #Ukraine #RU #KP #IR #UA

Klaus said he had responded to a user named Sukkola, who he claimed had blocked him. He stated that his criticism was directed at Said Aw-Musse's position as a religious authority rather than at his personal actions. Klaus described classical Sunni Islam as a tradition in which sharia is seen as divinely ordained and as a legal system superior to human laws. According to him, it included legal, moral, and social rules regarding, among other things, testimony, inheritance, apostasy, and legislative authority. Klaus wrote that Aw-Musse had studied theology in Saudi Arabia and worked in a mosque where the teachings of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab had been used. He described this figure as an ultra-conservative thinker who demanded the return of Islam to its literal roots. According to Klaus, Aw-Musse's refusal to clarify his position on the primacy of Finnish law and the status of sharia justified suspicion. Merely following the law, in his opinion, did not indicate whether he considered the constitutional order of Finland to be just and final or a temporary imposition. Klaus expressed a desire to know what kind of Finland Aw-Musse envisioned in 50 or 100 years. Klaus believed that questions regarding women's rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and criminal law were not leading him into a trap but were inquiries into whether Aw-Musse accepted the principles of the Finnish rule of law. He deemed Aw-Musse's public stance significant for its societal relevance due to his religious role. According to Klaus, integration required not only adherence to the law but also acceptance of fundamental values. #uskonto #oikeudet #kulttuuri (translated)

Interest on interest stated that the voters' decision to vote out a woman and instead elect Nooshi as deputy prime minister, whom the writer described as an Islamist communist, was a poor mark for the voters. The writer also contrasted Gunnar Strömmer with "Mogge" and Pål with Hultqvist, whom they referred to derogatorily. Additionally, the writer described a woman as angry and lacking leadership qualities and suggested that Strandhäll could perhaps be given an important position. The post concluded with the writer calling the situation horrific. #politik #val2022 #Sverige (translated)

The author 🅲🅾🆇🆇 described Azerbaijan as Islamic and wrote that the wearing of headscarves had been banned there as of that moment. According to his account, the ban applied to both female students and teachers. https://t.co/sPvYMRXxPQ #Aserbaidschan #Kopftuchverbot #Religionsfreiheit (translated)