Search

Jari Mäkäräinen criticized Sanna Ukkola's writing about the Prime Minister's meeting with Imam Sharmarke Said Aw-Mussen. According to Mäkäräinen, Ukkola regarded the meeting as ordinary work and believed that the imam, who was born in Turku, was being asked impossible questions regarding Sharia. Mäkäräinen argued that asking the imam was not a misunderstanding: in his view, the imam left open whether Sharia would be applied in Finland in family or criminal law matters. Mäkäräinen wrote that, according to him, freedom of religion did not justify the establishment of a parallel legal system alongside Finnish laws. He claimed that in Muslim-majority countries, freedom of religion, women's equality, and individual rights were not realized in liberal democracies due to Islamic doctrine and Sharia. He cited Lebanon as an example, where he believed the growth of the Muslim population and political organization undermined previous balance and led to civil war. In France, Sweden, Belgium, and Britain, he mentioned the visibility of parallel societies, honor-based violence, segregation of areas and schools, and pressure to accept practices related to Sharia. In Finland in the 2000s, Mäkäräinen claimed that groups with a Muslim background who had immigrated were connected to the overrepresentation of sexual offenses, unemployment, use of social security, and demands for their own rules. He believed that distinguishing criticism of Islam from calls for deportation did not make questions about Sharia suspect. According to Mäkäräinen, the primacy of the Finnish Constitution and criminal law should be clear in all matters, and Finland did not need to repeat the experiences of countries where the application of Sharia had been tried. https://t.co/bGpZ7VaTux #uskonnonvapaus #integratio #muslimit (translated)

The author believed that this was not about individual silliness, but a long list indicated to him that racism had been toyed with throughout the entire term. He said that nothing real had been done about the issue. https://t.co/b2ouwo85hW #rasismi #oikeudet #politiikka #FI (translated)

Klaus said he had responded to a user named Sukkola, who he claimed had blocked him. He stated that his criticism was directed at Said Aw-Musse's position as a religious authority rather than at his personal actions. Klaus described classical Sunni Islam as a tradition in which sharia is seen as divinely ordained and as a legal system superior to human laws. According to him, it included legal, moral, and social rules regarding, among other things, testimony, inheritance, apostasy, and legislative authority. Klaus wrote that Aw-Musse had studied theology in Saudi Arabia and worked in a mosque where the teachings of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab had been used. He described this figure as an ultra-conservative thinker who demanded the return of Islam to its literal roots. According to Klaus, Aw-Musse's refusal to clarify his position on the primacy of Finnish law and the status of sharia justified suspicion. Merely following the law, in his opinion, did not indicate whether he considered the constitutional order of Finland to be just and final or a temporary imposition. Klaus expressed a desire to know what kind of Finland Aw-Musse envisioned in 50 or 100 years. Klaus believed that questions regarding women's rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and criminal law were not leading him into a trap but were inquiries into whether Aw-Musse accepted the principles of the Finnish rule of law. He deemed Aw-Musse's public stance significant for its societal relevance due to his religious role. According to Klaus, integration required not only adherence to the law but also acceptance of fundamental values. #uskonto #oikeudet #kulttuuri (translated)

Pjotr Debatt considered HS's writing a proper and fairly straightforward statement against face-covering cloaks. According to him, leftist parties often prioritized solidarity towards immigrants over women's rights, while moderate centrists and liberal circles remained silent to avoid allegations of capitulating. #naistenoikeudet #maahanmuutto #politiikka (translated)

Johannes Yrttiaho stated that he had submitted a dissenting opinion to the constitutional law committee's statement on the so-called criminal investigation legislation. According to him, the proposed intelligence powers for the police did not meet the requirements of the constitution. https://t.co/3N3M5bks4b #perustuslaki #rikostiedustelu #oikeudet (translated)

Rami Kurimo commented on the government's decision and wrote that in the future, people would have better opportunities to find out what the state, welfare areas, and municipalities purchased, from whom, and for what amount. He referred to Helsingin Sanomat as a source. https://t.co/8ALlDU3Vbc #hallitus #oikeudet #läpinäkyvyys (translated)

Alex Günsberg wrote that the Ministry of Finance had proposed raising the minimum retirement age to 70. He stated that people had been paying pension contributions throughout their working lives with the promise that retirement would begin at a certain age, but now the threshold had been moved without asking them. Günsberg estimated that the changes would continue until there was no clear limit to the retirement age. He claimed that pension funds were the property of the state and described people as becoming dependent on the support of a socialist central planner. #eläke #vanhuuseläke #oikeudet (translated)

Mika Merano wrote that he fundamentally believes it is wrong to think that the state owns children. According to him, the consequences of multiculturalism and inclusion particularly impact the children of families who cannot afford to choose. Merano said he understands the attractiveness of homeschooling if the alternative is a school that he described as having been proven excellent using Adlercreutz's observation method, but where instead of a peaceful learning environment and discipline there is language incompetence and restlessness. He compared the situation to those schools that students who experienced the peak years of PISA results remember. (translated)

Martti Paldanius claimed that one of the greatest threats to women in Finland was the prevalence of cultures where violence against women was accepted. According to him, Virta did not speak about this. Paldanius wrote that Finland should not accept violence against women. #kulttuuri (translated)

Korson Jussi I Vantaa defender! wrote that the restaurant had ceased operations in Tikkurila due to unrest. He claimed that the majority population was oppressing minorities and depriving them of their rights to restaurants, and described the situation as structural oppression. https://t.co/ZyJ0ZWnuxI #Tikkurila #Ravintolat #Oikeudet (translated)

Now think about it, people: an immigrant gets a guaranteed pension after living here for three years. Similarly, the rights of an immigrant to social security are the same as those who have lived and worked here all their lives. Finnish decision-makers are, in their ignorance, a class of their own on the whole planet. #maahanmuutto #sosiaaliturva #Suomi (translated)

If the equality ombudsman, the equality unit of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, the equality advisory board, and the equality and non-discrimination board were to be abolished tomorrow, nobody would notice, and no one's rights would be diminished. Under Finnish law, we are all equal. #yhteiskunta #oikeudet (translated)

"Opettaja valitti tapauksesta hallinto-oikeuteen. Hän ei omasta mielestään käyttänyt liiallista voimaa. Opettaja vetosi siihen, että oppilailla on oikeus saada opetusta, ja poistettu oppilas oli häirinnyt muiden opiskelua" Jälleen kerran perseiliän oikeudet menevät niiden ihmisten edelle, jotka hoitavat asiansa kunnolla. Demla taas suorittaa. #opetus #koulu #oikeudet

Kuten tästäkin nähdään, niin ihmisen ulkonäöstä ei voi päätellä, kuka on varas ja kuka ei. Mutta jos tiedossa on, että kyseessä on @Demarit-jäsen, niin silloin pitäisi pyrkiä nopeasti pakoon. Valitettavasti liikuntarajotteiset vanhukset eivät pääse näiltä verenimijöiltä karkuun. https://t.co/SsBfnXmpVp #ihmiset #oikeudet #yhteiskunta

Näyttää siltä, että julkinen tuki läpipolitisoituneelle Helsinki pride-järjestölle on tulossa tiensä päähän tai ainakin pienenemässä merkittävästi. Hyvä. Aidot kansalaisjärjestöt tulevat aina toimeen ilman julkista tukea, eikä varsinkaan aatteellisille järjestöille pidä veronmaksajien rahaa antaa. Tämän sanottuani korjaan erityisesti vasemmistossa elävää harhaluuloa: Se, ettei halua antaa julkista rahaa Pride-järjestölle ei tarkoita sitä, että vastustaisi seksuaalivähemmistöjen oikeuksia. Esimerkiksi minä uskon vahvasti siihen, että jokaisella, myös vähemmistöillä, täytyy olla samat oikeudet lain edessä sekä vapaus elää turvallista oman näköistään elämää, kunhan eivät niin tekemällä estä muiden vastaavia oikeuksia. Mutta en halua, että kansalaiset pakotetaan tukemaan rahallisesti inhokkiaatteitaan. Tai, että aatteellisia tunnuksia tuodaan valtuustosaleihin, ministeriöihin tai muualle julkishallintoon, oli kyse sitten pride-lipuista, uskonnollisista tunnuksista tai puoluepoliittisista tunnuksista. Tällainen tolkun linja ei polje tai vaaranna kenenkään oikeuksia, päin vastoin. Hallinnon aatteellinen neutraalius varmistaa, etteivät myöskään vähemmistöihin aidon vihamielisesti suhtautuvat ideologiat, kuten islamismi, kommunismi tai natsismi, pääse vahingossakaan ottamaan kuristusotetta päätöksentekokoneistostamme. Siksi myös sateenkaariyhteisön on syytä olla tyytyväinen, että järjestötuet pienenevät ja niitä kohdistetaan järkevämmin. Näillä saatesanoilla kannustan kaikkia suomalaisia tukemaan itselleen tärkeiksi kokemiaan kansalaisjärjestöjä. #Terestroika https://t.co/NqFVwD0ekj #HelsinkiPride #Kansalaisjärjestöt #Oikeudet

Von der Leyen puhui eurooppalaisesta yhteistyöstä ääriliikkeitä vastaan. Rohkeita aloitteita, kuten Kanadan liitännäisjäsenyys EU:ssa. Nyt tulee vahvistaa taloutta ja turvallisuutta, pysäyttää ilmaston ääri-ilmiöt ja elinkustannusten nousu sekä muistaa työntekijöiden oikeudet. #Eurooppalaisuus #Turvallisuus #Ilmastonmuutos #CA

Jutun mukaan palautuslennolla oli lääkärin ja sairaanhoitajan lisäksi yhdenvertaisuusvaltuutetun edustaja. Käsittämätöntä! Hänellä ei voi olla operaatiossa mitään lakiin perustuvaa roolia. Huoletonta menoa, kun ei ole vastuuta kustannuksista! 😡 https://t.co/nKiRCDwYqx #terveydenhuolto #oikeudet #kansanterveys

Suomalaisessa koulussa ei ole pakko: - Istua jälki-istuntoa - Oppia OPS:n vaatimia asioita - Seurata opetusta - Totella opettajaa - Käyttäytyä kunnolla Opettajilta on viety auktoriteetti, kunnollisilta oikeudet ja häiriköiltä velvollisuudet. Ei ihme, että oppimistulokset laskutrendillä. https://t.co/isUy3MuNLX #koulutus #opetus #oppiminen