Non-fiction writer Ari Haasio said that there would be no Finns without immigration. He described Finland's story as a narrative of its people: they had changed both society and the notion of Finnishness, and they did not remain stagnant. https://t.co/JVAY5tRSDC #maahanmuutto #Suomi #kulttuuri #FI (translated)
Saarelainen wrote that he is happily embracing the militarization of society and noted that, in his opinion, one could already find suitable equipment for fighting in Prisma. He added that one could also earn S-bonus from the purchase. https://t.co/mWXe8Gtzkd #militarisaatio #yhteiskunta #Prisma (translated)
Mikael Lith wrote that, in his opinion, the center of Helsinki has become more unpleasant in recent years, especially on weekend evenings. He described loud and swearing groups of people, individuals under the influence of substances, and rundown places. According to Lith, there was an increasing need for police and security guards, and he estimated that it wouldn't be long before Helsinki would become Finland's Birmingham. #Helsinki #yhteiskunta #kulttuuri (translated)
The author expressed that they were shocked by the discussion surrounding Imam Sharmarke Said Aw-Mussen. They wrote that Muslims were constantly required to assimilate, respect Finnish values, and participate in social discourse, noting that the imam was now trying to do just that. #kotoutuminen #yhteiskunta #keskustelu #FI (translated)
Antti Järvinen wrote that he sensed something suspicious in the case and described his intuition as structurally racist. https://t.co/VbsgkllAX5 https://t.co/Z5mfPtAIha #rasismi #yhteiskunta #ennakkoluulot (translated)
Jari Sarasvuo criticized a lupine-based society and also used a derogatory term referring to Russians. He wrote that leaving structures unaddressed would slow down all operations and increase costs to such an extent that the disadvantages and disruptions would be, in his opinion, enormous. Sarasvuo said that the delays and foolishness of the permit authorities would lead to "Google phenomena." #yhteiskunta #rakenteet #muutos (translated)
Tuukka Kuru wrote that only a few middle-class people would be needed to publicly state the matter, who would appear under their own names and faces. According to him, others would notice that there would be no consequences. #keskiluokka #julkaisuvapaus #yhteiskunta (translated)
Kari previously mentioned that he used to laugh at people who wanted to break away from society's hustle, but now he said he appreciates those who can do it. He justified his view by claiming that hardworking men were taxed into poverty, the price of diesel was 2.5 euros per liter, the retirement age was 97 years, and the social democrats were winning the elections. https://t.co/RZxCXpzt2e #yhteiskunta #politiikka #verotus (translated)
Elina Hiltunen thanked for the support she received and said she understood that things might have looked unusual from the outside. She claimed to have angered certain political entities, which she said were trying to discourage and silence her. Hiltunen stated that she had not given in or stopped speaking, which she said had led to new attempts to pressure her. She asked why these entities saw her as such a significant threat. #politiikka #vapaaehtoisuus #yhteiskunta (translated)
Suvi-Anne Siimes found it somewhat silly that a decision, which she claimed would come into effect in 2035, was made. She suggested that next, it could be decided that the council members would not fly or travel on cruise ships for city business and that they should use their free HSL ticket instead of a car for meeting trips. https://t.co/d5udf5pyIe #kestäväkehitys #yhteiskunta #liikkuminen (translated)
Kalle Saarela wrote that Majanen from the Ministry of Finance defended on television a proposal to raise the retirement age to 70. According to Saarela, such statements weaken the last remaining trust in Finland's pension system. He noted that the average Finnish man dies before the age of 80 and described this as meaning working until the grave. Saarela rejected the proposal. #yleastudio https://t.co/0lZcK9S2SX #eläke #suomi #yhteiskunta (translated)
Samif wrote that the Ministry of Finance's statement on raising the retirement age came at an appropriate time, as there is now a public discussion on the topic. He assessed that raising the retirement age would become one of the major questions in the elections and said that the party could not ignore it. According to him, the party that wanted to raise the retirement age to 70 years and break the already promised social contract would lose the elections. #eläke #vaalit #kansalaiskeskustelu (translated)
Jyri Toikka wrote that according to the social agreement, he would retire at the age of 65 and that he had paid pension contributions of up to 80,000 euros per year. If the agreement were to be violated, he demanded the return of the contributions with interest and argued that he would not need to be paid a pension either. He directed his message to Petteri Orpo and the RKP. #eläke #yhteiskunta #talous (translated)
Korson Jussi asked whether such stickers were equally offensive. He wrote that the feminist movement claimed that the streets belonged to it, but said that they did not belong to the movement. https://t.co/Kgh81NBBLp #feminismi #yhteiskunta #syrjintä (translated)
Tuukka Kuru wrote that he had been amused by the panic surrounding the stickers. According to him, street robbery, taxi rape, or gang assault did not shock the liberal journalist as much as seeing an unwanted political message. https://t.co/OAkhU71gVF #poliikka #media #yhteiskunta (translated)
Henri Vanhanen demanded the publication of Tiitinen's list. He stated that he had supported its release before and assessed that the secrecy maintained for over 30 years had generated mystique around the list that was no longer beneficial. Vanhanen pointed out that the names on the list would not prove anyone guilty, in his opinion. He believed that publishing it would help distinguish known facts from the speculation that had arisen over the decades. Vanhanen also connected the issue to the open handling of Finland's Cold War history. He wrote that transparency was important in the current discussion on security policy, influence, and the actions of foreign powers. https://t.co/j8CXiiVumh #TiitisenLista #Avoimuus #Historia (translated)
Arto Koskelo wrote that "rubber boat activity" should be stopped for both women and men: for the safety of women and the benefit of men across the country. He wondered why the activity was allowed to continue and claimed that girls and women were paying the highest price for it regardless of their ethnic background. #naistenoikeudet #yhteiskunta #turvallisuus (translated)
Samuli Katainen compared politics to institutionalization in prison: in his view, living for a long time in a bubble funded by taxpayers can make ordinary life feel theoretical. #Vankila #Politiikka #Yhteiskunta (translated)
Rami Kurimo referred to Puhos, according to which Finnish was hardly heard there, and cited Iltalehti as the source. He asked whether it was reasonable for Finland to accept immigrants whom he described as unwilling to integrate and wanting to make Finland an environment similar to that of the Middle East. https://t.co/cz6rQf8bFe #maahanmuutto #kotoutuminen #Suomi (translated)
Pjotr Debatt assessed that the interview condensed Fatim Diarra's political career: according to him, Diarra expressed hatred and anger towards misogyny and performed for her assumed supporter group. Debatt claimed that Diarra did not achieve anything concrete, even though she made a lot of noise and used angry rhetoric. https://t.co/Y5AFuRpKoO #politiikka #naisviham #yhteiskunta (translated)
