Search

Bartosz Karcz wrote that Wisła Kraków was quite helpless in attack in Warsaw, but in a close match, the assessment of the game will focus on the actions of the referees. He criticized the officiating of Damian Sylwestrzak from the Sunday match. #LEGWIS https://t.co/ey0Xwi00NZ #Ekstraklasa #PiłkaNożna #WisłaKraków (translated)

A new assessment of global health risks warns that nuclear war and the misuse of artificial intelligence could pose threats that, in extreme cases, could lead to the extinction of humanity by 2100, although the likelihood of such scenarios is assessed as low. #jedrskavojna #umetnainteligenca #globalnegrožnje (translated)

The matter looks serious. Very credible materials in the form of recordings have been revealed. A good decision by the KO club. Until clarifications, Kołodziejczak has been removed from the club. Now it's time for the services to clarify this case. I always emphasize that in our country there is a presumption of innocence, so I am also very cautious in my judgments. But a swift clarification is something that surely every Polish woman and every Polish man expects from a politician today – said Krzysztof Paszyk from the Polish People's Party, who was also a guest of Krzysztof Ziemiec on RMF FM. Institutions should, without delay, start clarifying this matter. Paszyk agreed with Biedroń, who emphasized that “institutions should, without delay, start clarifying this matter.” #MichałKołodziejczak #KoalicjaObywatelska #przemoc (translated)

The author of the post objected to public insults directed at him. He wrote that he does not know the author of those insults, has not engaged in a discussion with him, and does not recall ever addressing him in a similar manner. He pointed out that he accepts criticism of his assessments and arguments, but he deemed personal attacks as a departure from the debate. He called on the interlocutor to stop insulting him and added that he does not intend to participate in such exchanges, but will not tolerate them. #debatypubliczne #szacunek #kultura_dialogu (translated)

The Prosecutor's Office in Przemyśl is awaiting the third opinion from psychiatric experts regarding Ihor M., who is suspected of a fatal attack at the abbey in Jarosław, following two earlier assessments indicating serious mental disorders that affect his ability to be interrogated. #IhorM #psychopatologia #prawo (translated)

The author accused Marcin Przydacz of inconsistency in statements regarding the embassy's staffing in Washington. He reminded that on October 5, Przydacz had written that Nikodem Rachoń might not have been the agreed candidate and that another name was considered. In a later statement, Przydacz claimed that Minister Radosław Sikorski met with the person proposed by the Presidential Palace, checked their qualifications, including language skills, and accepted them. The author requested the name of that person. He noted that the meeting itself and the positive assessment of the candidate do not prove that a final agreement regarding the embassy in Washington or the entire package of nominations was reached. He added that Przydacz's repeated claim that Donald Tusk blocked the agreement does not become a fact just because it was stated. The author also reminded that, in his opinion, the president appoints ambassadors but does not conduct foreign policy. He cited a ruling by the Constitutional Tribunal in case Kpt 2/08, which — as he wrote — indicated that foreign policy is conducted by the Council of Ministers, and the president cooperates in this area with the prime minister and the relevant minister. He asked who, when, and to what extent agreed on the candidacy and on what basis Przydacz claimed that Tusk personally blocked the entire agreement. He characterized his account of the behind-the-scenes negotiations as presented to the public in a way that suggested it was an established fact. #Polityka #Ambasadorzy #Polska (translated)

The author of the entry accused Bogucki of attacking the government, the prime minister, and ministers after declaring the need to end the political war, and then criticized the sitting Marshal of the Sejm. As he wrote, Bogucki referred to him as a "blemish on Polish democracy," undermined his right to hold this office, and accused him of disrespect. The author also reminded that Bogucki presented himself, Nawrocki, and the Presidential Chancellery as democrats and statesmen. He considered the way Nawrocki exercised his office as the main blemish on democracy. He assessed that the president constantly participated in the political dispute, publicly attacked those in power, and exacerbated conflicts between state bodies while simultaneously calling on others to end the dispute. He noted that this was his private opinion and wrote that he did not take sides in the party conflict but evaluated the matter from the perspective of the state and its institutions. He announced that he would remind Bogucki and Nawrocki of their subsequent statements about responsibility and calming the dispute. In the end, he asked to send regards to Przydacz. #PolskaDemokracja #WojnaPolityczna #Polityka (translated)

Jarosław Królewski appealed for an end to frequent changes in the national team coaches and a focus on long-term work. He wrote that after the victories of players and coaches, there is excessive praise, while after defeats, the assessment tends to be too harsh. In his opinion, players should be developed also between training camps, and the staff should make use of data regarding their form, development, workloads, and suitability for specific roles. Królewski assessed that the coach should primarily be a leader and motivator, while tactics, analysis, and preparation should be a collaborative effort of the staff, supported by AI and Big Data. He also regarded the creation of a coherent development plan for the upcoming age groups of the national team, at least from U18 level, as important, along with regular cooperation between coaches, analysts, and those responsible for player development. He wrote that in Poland, long-term planning often gives way to immediate reactions: after victories, monuments are built, while after defeats, blame and successors are sought. He added that accountability for results is necessary, but it should not mean constantly starting over. He also appealed for a reduction in disputes and stated that someone else's defeat is not automatically one's own success. Królewski noted that despite the market, capital, talents, and potential of a country with nearly 40 million people, Polish companies with domestic capital tend to spend more on promotional pens than on long-term support for sports, education, technology, or culture. He added that the sporadic presence of Polish clubs in the Champions League is, in his opinion, a problem for the entire ecosystem, not just the owners, coaches, or players. He mentioned Wisła, Legia, Lech, and Raków, emphasizing that regular competition of Polish clubs at the highest European level should be a shared goal. #PiłkaNożna #Sport #Edukacja (translated)

The commentator criticized the explanation of the "Lie Detector" program on TVP regarding Tusk's words about fuel costing 5.19. He wrote that the program presented it as an assessment of the current situation, rather than an election promise or one of the "100 specifics." According to the author, Tusk did not announce that fuel would cost 5.19 after a victorious election but referred to the moment when he made those words. The commentator charged that such an interpretation made people look like idiots. #Polska #Polityka #Wybory (translated)

The author wrote that Moody's downgraded Poland's rating to A3, equating it with the ratings of Fitch and S&P. According to him, the agency pointed out the deficit and debt, as well as political barriers hindering their reduction. The author added that the draft budget for 2027 assumes 695 billion PLN in revenues and mentioned presidential vetoes regarding increases... #Polska #finanse #rating #PL (translated)

The author wrote that Moody's downgraded Poland's rating to A3, aligning it with the ratings of Fitch and S&P. According to him, the agency pointed out in its justification the deficit, debt, and political barriers hindering their reduction. The author added that the budget for 2027 assumes 695 billion zlotys in revenue and mentioned presidential vetoes regarding increases. #rating #Polska #budżet #PL (translated)

Ciril wrote that he had heard rumors that someone had threatened a woman, among other things, that they had threatened to push her off the road. He believed that the threats could be real if the new leadership team in healthcare endangered the interests of the supplier mafia, as large sums of money circulate in healthcare, according to him. As another possibility, he mentioned that a criminal group, which he said was running the country from behind the scenes and stealing public money, might act against the Democrats after a failure with Resnica. If the rumors were true, it would be understandable, in his opinion, that the woman was afraid for her life. In this context, he recalled the death of Dušan Konda, which he labeled a suspicious suicide after the failed attempt to bribe members of parliament from Resnica. Ciril also wrote that people might not realize the seriousness of the intervention in the flow of public money into private pockets. According to estimates by experts and institutions he referred to, Slovenia is said to have lost about 3.5 billion euros a year due to corruption, or 10 million euros a day. #korupcija #politika #Slovenija (translated)

Ewa referred to A. Domański's assessment that the president posed a threat to the Polish economy. She stated that it was a modest evaluation because, in her opinion, the president endangered all of Poland. She called him the worst president in the country's history and asserted that even Jaruzelski had more support. #Polska #gospodarka #prezydent (translated)

Mr. Grzegorz, I read the entire justification. And I agree with one thing – legal analysis cannot be replaced with the label of a "neo-judge," because that is not an argument 🤷‍♂️ However, the justification itself, although extensive and internally organized, in my opinion leaves two very serious legal problems. The first concerns Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision states that in preparatory proceedings, a "blanket warrant" can be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of their objection. Here, the prosecutor filed an objection. The court does not challenge the wording of the provision. It consciously deviates from it, considering that the binding objection of the prosecutor would violate the court's jurisdictional independence. It references Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 178 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 47 of the KPP, and part of the case law of appellate courts. This is a legal argument. But there is also an opposing line of case law, based precisely on the linguistic interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the court itself notes in the justification. I wrote about this yesterday. So it is not the case that there is no problem. There is a very serious dispute about the limits of interpretation contra legem and whether the court can practically deprive the premise, which the legislator explicitly included in the provision. The second problem I have is with the prognostic assessment. The court acknowledges that Romanowski left Poland, did not appear for the hearing concerning the temporary arrest, was outside the reach of Polish authorities, and even informed in his own application that he has a passport issued under a different identity 🤷‍♂️ The court considers these circumstances to be burdensome but then assumes that they cannot determine the assessment because one should look at it primarily prospectively. 🤔 And this is where I have the greatest doubt. The prediction of a suspect's future behavior does not occur in a vacuum. Its foundational material is, after all, their past behavior. 🤷‍♂️ If a person involved in the proceedings previously did not comply with procedural mechanisms, left the country, and remained outside the reach of the authorities, then their later declaration that from this moment they will comply with the conditions of the "blanket warrant" must be subjected to particularly rigorous assessment. The court may conclude that despite this, the risk has currently diminished. But it should convincingly demonstrate why specific past behaviors have lost their prognostic significance. Because if we are to predict a person’s future behavior while disregarding their past behavior, then a rather fundamental question arises - on what basis are we actually building this prediction? 🤷‍♂️ Therefore, I would not dismiss this ruling with the label of a neo-judge, but I would also not say that the problem ends with the justification sounding rational. A rationally constructed justification can still lead to a legally debatable result. In my opinion, this is exactly the kind of case we are dealing with here. The argumentation of the court is clear and can be recounted, but both the way of breaking the literal wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the prognostic assessment of the suspect's behavior leave significant legal doubts. If I were to rule on this matter, I would not grant the application. Firstly – due to the prosecutor's objection and the content of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Secondly – even accepting a different interpretation of this provision, I would not find sufficient grounds for a positive prognostic assessment. This is not about punishing Romanowski for the past. It is about assessing whether his past behavior allows rationally to assume that from this moment he will respect the obligations arising from the "blanket warrant." In my opinion – it does not allow 🤷‍♂️ And that is precisely why there is an appellate review. #prawo #justycja #analizaprawna (translated)

‼️ What is happening around UKEN raises very serious legal doubts. Just two days after the WSA ruling overturning the decision to dismiss Prof. Piotr Bork, the Minister of Science again suspends the Rector from performing duties. ❗️The court's ruling and the legal assessment contained in it cannot be #prawo #uczelnia #polska #UK (translated)

The control of the National Health Fund reveals that local politicians of the Civic Coalition in Piaseczno bypassed the queue at the municipal clinic, which resulted in a penalty being imposed on the facility and a negative assessment of its activities. #NFZ #KoalicjaObywatelska #Piaseczno (translated)