The author accused Marcin Przydacz of inconsistency in statements regarding the embassy's staffing in Washington. He reminded that on October 5, Przydacz had written that Nikodem Rachoń might not have been the agreed candidate and that another name was considered. In a later statement, Przydacz claimed that Minister Radosław Sikorski met with the person proposed by the Presidential Palace, checked their qualifications, including language skills, and accepted them. The author requested the name of that person. He noted that the meeting itself and the positive assessment of the candidate do not prove that a final agreement regarding the embassy in Washington or the entire package of nominations was reached. He added that Przydacz's repeated claim that Donald Tusk blocked the agreement does not become a fact just because it was stated. The author also reminded that, in his opinion, the president appoints ambassadors but does not conduct foreign policy. He cited a ruling by the Constitutional Tribunal in case Kpt 2/08, which — as he wrote — indicated that foreign policy is conducted by the Council of Ministers, and the president cooperates in this area with the prime minister and the relevant minister. He asked who, when, and to what extent agreed on the candidacy and on what basis Przydacz claimed that Tusk personally blocked the entire agreement. He characterized his account of the behind-the-scenes negotiations as presented to the public in a way that suggested it was an established fact. #Polityka #Ambasadorzy #Polska (translated)
