r00t🇪🇺

The author of the entry criticized Bogucki's statement, who — as he wrote — demanded the urgent adoption of regulations implementing the DSA and announced that Nawrocki would sign them on the first day, despite having previously vetoed such a law. The author demanded specific solutions to be indicated and an explanation of how they would differ from those questioned by the president. He assessed that shortening the vacatio legis would not resolve the fundamental dispute over the content of the regulations and the permissible mechanisms for interfering with civil rights. He also accused Bogucki of exploiting the safety of children in criticizing the government, while remaining silent about the president's responsibility for the veto. He called on him to present specific legal proposals instead of lecturing the prime minister about responsibility for the state. #Polityka #PrawaObywatelskie #DSA (translated)

The author criticized Donald Trump for announcing an energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. He wrote that the Ukrainian side had not confirmed the conclusion of an agreement, and two hours after the American president's declaration, Russia once again attacked Ukrainian energy infrastructure. He asked on what basis Trump announced an agreement whose existence was not confirmed by one of the parties to the conflict. The author assessed that Russia once again showed how little political declarations mean without effective mechanisms for enforcing obligations. He also urged Europe to consider how long it wants to base its security on Trump's assurances, which — as he wrote — increasingly diverged from reality. #Trump #Ukraina #Rosja (translated)

The author of the post criticized European leaders, arguing that their fear of Donald Trump's reaction was preventing them from firmly defending Europe's interests. He cited examples such as Venezuela, Greenland, economic pressure on European allies, strategic fuel reserves, interest in Russian oil assets, and decisions regarding Russia and Ukraine. The author emphasized that he understood the importance of the American military presence for Poland's security, but questioned the value of assurances to maintain or expand bases if economic interests or ad hoc political calculations could outweigh commitments to allies. He also assessed that Europe remained too dependent on the United States and Trump's decisions. He stressed that solidarity with Ukraine requires action, not just declarations. He called for open debate in Europe and greater independence on security issues. #Polityka #Europa #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the entry, r00t, questioned on what basis Moźdżonek attributed propaganda intentions to the government since — as he wrote — he did not know the nature of the threat or the premises that guided the services in providing information to the public. He acknowledged that the question of the legitimacy of disclosing the time and place of the meeting was valid, but the accusations of demagoguery and incompetence went too far. He also accused Moźdżonek of using the matter for a political attack, even though he criticized the government for such actions. He added that the security of the state also requires responsibility from those publicly commenting on the actions of institutions, and stated that Moźdżonek did not demonstrate that. #Polska #Bezpieczeństwo #Polityka (translated)

The author of the post expressed outrage, asking how one can be so cynical and deceitful. He addressed Nawrocki, congratulating him on his "political authority," and wrote that he finds it hard to imagine a greater manifestation of moral and political cynicism. #polityka #cynizm #autorytet (translated)

r00t🇪🇺 accused Leśkiewicz of inconsistency: in his opinion, Leśkiewicz criticized those in power for exploiting human tragedy for political gain, and then himself attacked the Prime Minister politically while claiming that the President was not guided by political PR. The author asked what specific guarantees regarding the presence of American troops in Poland Nawrocki had obtained from Donald Trump. He assessed that the discussions alone did not constitute a diplomatic achievement and wrote that Trump’s recent decisions raised his concerns. He reminded that talks with the American side about increasing and solidifying the presence of U.S. troops in Poland had been ongoing since at least 2018. r00t🇪🇺 also emphasized that the Chancellery of the President of Poland should not function as a party propaganda office, but rather represent a constitutional body of the state and adhere to standards of reliability, seriousness, and accountability for words. He expected information and facts from the President's spokesperson instead of political slogans. #Polityka #Bezpieczeństwo #Dyplomacja (translated)

The author turned to Pobożny, pointing out that introducing term limits for deputies and senators requires changing the Constitution, which — as he wrote — results from Article 99 and the opinion of the Bureau of Expertise and Impact Assessment of the Chancellery of the Sejm from February 27, 2025. He noted that Stefaniak announced his intention to change the Constitution, not to bypass it, and criticized Pobożny's irony. He asked whether he and his environment oppose term limits or merely do not believe in the possibility of obtaining a constitutional majority. #Konstytucja #dwukadencyjność #polityka (translated)

The author of the entry assessed that Donald Trump believed he was entitled to eight Nobel Peace Prizes, and that their non-awarding was seen by him almost as an insult to the United States. He criticized Karol Nawrocki and his political entourage for, as he wrote, their almost unbounded admiration for Trump. He questioned how one could base Poland's security on his declarations and trust them uncritically, since — in the author's opinion — Trump placed his own ego above the seriousness of the office. He added that foreign policy should not be based on the cult of an individual, and that the security of the state cannot depend on the whims and wounded ambitions of one person. He also stated that he was concerned about the uncritical fascination with Trump among Polish politicians. #Polityka #Trump #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the entry asked Czarnka whether he would support conducting the same tests on Nawrocki and his close circle. He pointed out that since Czarnka demanded far-reaching control of representatives of power, he should accept the same standards for his own political environment. He also asked whether moral requirements and those concerning transparency would only apply to Czarnka's political opponents and requested an answer from him. #Polityka #Przejrzystość #Testy (translated)

The author criticized Bogucki for publishing flattering posts about the Nawrocki family and accused him of lacking sensitivity towards the tragedies that, as he wrote, were occurring in Poland. He pointed to violence in schools, the persecution of children based on their nationality, and hatred towards Ukrainian families and their children. He asked why Agata Nawrocka, whom he portrayed as engaged in child protection, did not take a decisive public stance on these issues. He reminded that she established a foundation aimed at combating, among other things, hate, participated in international initiatives concerning children's safety, appeared alongside Melania Trump, and visited foreign aid institutions. He noted that he was aware of her earlier statement condemning violence against Ukrainian teenage girls, but he felt that a one-time comment was not a substitute for a response to ongoing tragedies. The author emphasized that he did not hold Nawrocka responsible for school violence but criticized the discrepancy between her declared commitment and her public activity in light of recent tragedies. He also wrote that she did not need special constitutional competencies or an invitation from the White House to condemn violence and advocate for the safety of Ukrainian children in Poland. He accused Bogucki of idealizing the presidential family and ended with a question of what further tragedy is needed to hear a decisive voice from the First Lady. #Polska #PrzemocWszkołach #ObronaDzieci (translated)

The author of the entry criticized some Polish politicians for their excessive focus on Donald Trump. He wrote that alliances are formed between states, not around individuals, and he assessed that political declarations lose significance when economic interests arise. He added that American presidents come and go, but the effects of political submissiveness remain. #Polska #Polityka #Sojusze (translated)

The author of the entry criticized Andrzej Duda for his arguments, comparing them to party propaganda. He accused the former president of accusing Donald Tusk of inciting hatred and deliberately destroying social bonds, although he — according to the author — did not present evidence for these accusations or a causal link between the cited events. The author reminded that Duda held office for ten years and suggested that he should account for his own statements and involvement in deepening political divides. He noted that the former president had the right to criticize the government, but he should not expect that his accusations would be taken as proven facts merely because of his previous office. He also criticized his moralizing tone and pointed out the responsibility for the way he conducted the presidency. #Polityka #DebataPubliczna #Prezydentura (translated)

The author assessed that Donald Trump's recent decisions might have been aimed at rebuilding Republican support before the Congress elections on November 3. He pointed to the promise of a $5,000 payout, Trump's change of stance on mail-in voting, and the energy agreement with Vladimir Putin, which was purportedly meant to help lower fuel prices. According to the author, the supply of Russian oil could have had a minimal impact on prices but serious political consequences. The author wrote that Europe is bearing the costs of sanctions, and Ukraine continues to face Russian aggression, while Trump presented the agreement as a way to combat inflation. He also noted a decline in support for the president and growing social discontent, as well as some Republican politicians publicly distancing themselves from the administration's decisions. According to the author, Trump's actions did not fit into a long-term economic strategy but were aimed at regaining voters and maintaining a Republican majority in Congress. He argued that the president was primarily concerned with his own political survival and the interests of his family and friends. He warned that the security of allies, sanctions, and the international credibility of the USA should not be used to achieve such goals. The author concluded that Trump should not be trusted or relied upon for long-term agreements. In his view, cooperation with him should be limited to the bare minimum, as his position could change depending on current political interests. #Trump #Polityka #Geopolityka (translated)

The author of the post objected to public insults directed at him. He wrote that he does not know the author of those insults, has not engaged in a discussion with him, and does not recall ever addressing him in a similar manner. He pointed out that he accepts criticism of his assessments and arguments, but he deemed personal attacks as a departure from the debate. He called on the interlocutor to stop insulting him and added that he does not intend to participate in such exchanges, but will not tolerate them. #debatypubliczne #szacunek #kultura_dialogu (translated)

The author referred to Zbigniew Bogucki's statements about the seriousness of politics, contrasting them with the behavior of Karol Nawrocki. He wrote that Bogucki considered the Prime Minister's walking on the pavement next to Belweder to be grotesque, while he deemed Nawrocki's entrance into the ring and boxing demonstration during an official foreign visit to be serious politics. He emphasized that Nawrocki represented the Republic of Poland, not the fan community or the boxing section. He accused Bogucki of applying double standards and inconsistent logic. #Polska #Polityka #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the entry criticized Bogucki for calling Prime Minister Donald Tusk's walk near the Belvedere a grotesque "sidewalk and lawn" politics. He pointed out that Tusk was following his usual route between Parkowa and the Prime Minister's Office and recorded a several dozen-second material. The author accused Karol Nawrocki's entourage of inflaming the conflict with the government and then blaming the other side for it. He reminded that in his address, Nawrocki had opposed the ongoing political war and then called on the government to cease it. As examples of what he called a lack of "serious politics," he mentioned, among others, using nicotine bags during official events, weightlifting shows, historical statements, reactions to journalists, vetoes and conflicts with the government, as well as participation in boxing galas. He argued that criticizing the Prime Minister's walk while justifying similar actions of one's own camp meant applying double standards. #Polityka #Premier #Społeczeństwo (translated)

The author accused Marcin Przydacz of inconsistency in statements regarding the embassy's staffing in Washington. He reminded that on October 5, Przydacz had written that Nikodem Rachoń might not have been the agreed candidate and that another name was considered. In a later statement, Przydacz claimed that Minister Radosław Sikorski met with the person proposed by the Presidential Palace, checked their qualifications, including language skills, and accepted them. The author requested the name of that person. He noted that the meeting itself and the positive assessment of the candidate do not prove that a final agreement regarding the embassy in Washington or the entire package of nominations was reached. He added that Przydacz's repeated claim that Donald Tusk blocked the agreement does not become a fact just because it was stated. The author also reminded that, in his opinion, the president appoints ambassadors but does not conduct foreign policy. He cited a ruling by the Constitutional Tribunal in case Kpt 2/08, which — as he wrote — indicated that foreign policy is conducted by the Council of Ministers, and the president cooperates in this area with the prime minister and the relevant minister. He asked who, when, and to what extent agreed on the candidacy and on what basis Przydacz claimed that Tusk personally blocked the entire agreement. He characterized his account of the behind-the-scenes negotiations as presented to the public in a way that suggested it was an established fact. #Polityka #Ambasadorzy #Polska (translated)

The author wrote that TVN should not be treated like an ordinary production company, as it is one of the largest media entities in Poland and — as indicated — the media influence the flow of information, public debate, and the informational security of the state. He explained that the station is subject to a statutory mechanism for controlling investments concerning protected entities, which allows the state to assess whether a change of ownership could threaten public order or security. He noted that the transaction was not blocked, and the minister was supposed to evaluate it. He added that the fact that both the seller and the buyer are American companies does not negate Poland's interest in who controls a large television station operating on its territory. #media #Polska #TVN (translated)

The author of the post accused Daniel Obajtek of confusing the company's financial result with the loss resulting from a specific decision. He emphasized that the accusation concerning ORLEN was not related to the accounting loss of 4.1 billion PLN in the third quarter of 2023, but rather to the damage that, in his opinion, could have been caused by a specific pricing policy. The author pointed out that the company could have made a billion-dollar profit while also suffering a loss if, without that decision, its result would have been higher. He added that an increase in sales volume did not rule out losses on margin from lowered prices. He assessed that a person who publicly struggles to distinguish these concepts should not have been in charge of the largest Polish corporation. Obajtek's subsequent posts also prompted him to ponder how the former CEO of ORLEN ended up in that position. #ORLEN #finanse #polityka (translated)

The author of the post reminded Jarosław Bogucki that Jarosław Kaczyński mentioned in 2011 the possibility of lowering excise taxes to reduce gasoline prices, which then exceeded 5.40 PLN. He wrote that PiS raised alarms at that time due to this price. He added that when the party was in power in 2021 and prices rose again, Kaczyński argued that excise taxes should not be lowered as they represent an important source of state revenue. The author asked whether this declaration will also be consistently enforced from now on and whether archived statements will apply only to Donald Tusk. #Kaczyński #PiS #benzyna (translated)