Search

Bartosz Lewandowski ironically wrote that Michał Kołodziejczak, in terms of respect for women, was supposed to cultivate the best traditions of the Coalition Civic's strict leadership. He added that prestigious British universities surely taught how one should behave towards women. https://t.co/9TGVTFl6mu #szacunek #kobiety #tradycje (translated)

The author wrote that something terrifying was happening before his eyes. He assessed that the situations described by the media will be discussed for a long time, and among the questions that will arise is whether they could have been prevented. In a conversation with GoniecPL, he spoke, as he emphasized, as a father, teacher, and lecturer, not as a former politician. (translated)

BPM Chief Marcin Przydacz summarized the ongoing visit of the President of the Republic of Poland and his spouse to the Philippines. He wrote that it included a conversation with President Marcos about bilateral relations, especially economic ones, and about Poland's future in the G20 group. He noted that the Philippines chaired ASEAN this year and was set to host a summit of the organization with the participation of the President of the United States in a few weeks. According to Przydacz, Poland's voice before this meeting was important. Przydacz wrote that the President took a group of entrepreneurs to the Philippines, and during the visit, a Polish-Filipino business summit in the IT sector took place, which was patronized by President Nawrocki. He expressed hope that the meeting would yield positive results. He also mentioned the President's lecture at the University of Santo Tomas, aimed at young Filipinos, which was intended to present the potential of Poland and its economy as well as the country's growing political role. Przydacz assessed that the President's contacts with Manny Pacquiao, an eight-time world champion, former senator, and then minister for poverty alleviation, helped promote Poland and the Polish brand in the Philippines and Southeast Asia. He wrote that he considered this aspect of the visit to be particularly effective and emphasized that Poland should be promoted in a modern way. #Polska #Filipiny #dyplomacja (translated)

Hanna Shen wrote that critics of Karol Nawrocki's participation in the boxing training with Manny Pacquiao expected a lecture, but saw the president in the ring instead. In her opinion, the recording published by Pacquiao could have reached millions of Filipinos and served as effective promotion for Poland. She reminded that Pacquiao was a former senator and the only world champion in eight weight classes in history. Shen noted that Nawrocki also spoke at the Catholic University of Santo Tomas in Manila, founded by Dominicans in 1611. According to her, the university was older than Harvard and was considered the oldest functioning university in Asia. She wrote that José Rizal studied there, and Nawrocki laid a wreath at his statue. She also mentioned Pope Francis's meeting with young people at the university in 2015. According to Shen, the president spoke to students about the shared experiences of Poland and the Philippines, such as foreign domination and the struggle to preserve identity, as well as about faith, family, solidarity, freedom, and sovereignty. He also recalled the Russian invasion of Ukraine and hybrid attacks on Poland, emphasizing that deterrence requires strength. Shen believed that this message could be understood in a country dealing with Chinese pressures at sea. She added that serious discussions, a lecture, and training with a boxing legend could have been elements of the same diplomatic visit. https://t.co/O6JtNM19h7 #Polska #Filipiny #dyplomacja (translated)

Damian Urbaniec wrote that he performed for the first time in the role of lecturer and started "Press Spokesperson Workshops" at UKEN in Krakow. He thanked the students for participating in the first class and expressed hope for interesting discussions and knowledge useful for their future work. https://t.co/meQ6VVh5ZJ #wykładowca #warsztaty #Edukacja (translated)

The spokesperson for the President of the Republic of Poland, Rafał Leśkiewicz, said on Radio Jedynka that the United States conducted a review of its military forces in Europe. Its results were to be included in a document that would first go to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and likely be presented to Donald Trump around the turn of November and December. According to Leśkiewicz, a decision about the deployment of American forces in Europe would then be made. He added that Poland should strive to have a base located in the country and assessed that the statements of Prime Minister Donald Tusk suggesting a different course for the conversation between Trump and Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz did not help in this regard. Leśkiewicz stated that the president hoped until the end for the ruling party to prepare a solution in accordance with the constitution but did not want Poles to remain hostages of Tusk's politics. He accused the prime minister of using fuel prices in political disputes and attributed the responsibility for their high prices during the summer period to the ruling party. The spokesperson also argued that the laws vetoed by the president left several billion zlotys in the pockets of Poles, which they could manage in a difficult economic situation. Speaking about the president's visit to the Philippines, Leśkiewicz described it as the first historic visit of a Polish president to that country. He informed that Karol Nawrocki opened the Polish-Filipino business summit dedicated to the IT industry, organized since 2022, and delivered a lecture at the University of Santo Tomas in Manila. He added that the Philippines bought Polish Black Hawk helicopters and were to acquire more, and he regarded the development of economic cooperation with this country as important. The spokesperson said that the international actions of the president conducted since the beginning of the year aimed to support Poland's permanent presence in the G20 group, develop economic cooperation, attract capital, and facilitate Polish companies in obtaining contracts. He emphasized that Poland was interested in ensuring that the invitation to the G20 was not a one-time event. He pointed out that good relations with the United States were key, reminding that it was Donald Trump's decision that invited Poland to the group. He added that President Karol Nawrocki sought further allies, and the government should support these efforts. At the same time, he described the economic situation as a deepening crisis, indicating a high deficit and budget gap. #Polska #G20 #USA (translated)

The commentator described the exchange of opinions between Witold Zembaczyński and Ferek regarding the opposition's projects and President Karol Nawrocki. Zembaczyński reportedly stated that the opposition's projects would not be passed and would remain in limbo, adding that he did not know if they were useful for anything. Ferek defined this as the Civic Coalition's approach to parliamentarism, to which Zembaczyński replied that this is what democracy is about. In the end, the author used an offensive nickname and claimed that his addressee understands democracy only in its Chinese and North Korean versions. #demokracja #opolityce #parlamentaryzm (translated)

The Investor Profession wrote that he calmly demonstrated in one of the episodes that the stock market in the long term is a positive-sum game. He accused Robert Gwiazdowski of having given a lecture titled "Casino Royale" at the WallStreet conference several years ago on a topic he—according to the author—was not knowledgeable about, and investors pointed out his mistakes. According to the Investor Profession, that criticism hurt Gwiazdowski's professorial ego, and from then on he periodically returned to the anecdote and boasted about the outrage it had provoked. The author added that a scientist should seek ways to overturn their own theses and change them in light of evidence. He also crudely suggested that Gwiazdowski should publicly compromise himself during his next television appearance, claiming that it would provoke similar controversies and substantive effects but would create a less socially harmful anecdote. #inwestycje #rynekakcji #finanse (translated)

"When they arrive, I will confirm that I really believe" I am one of the few commentators who, to journalists' questions about whether I believe in a permanent base and various beneficial moves for Poland, have always responded: "When they arrive, I will confirm that I really believe," because there is still a bit more smoke than fire in all this - assessed Bogusław Pacek, a retired major general, professor, director of the Polish Army Museum, and also a lecturer at the Firefighting Academy. #USA #wojsko #Polska (translated)

The District Prosecutor's Office in Warsaw has charged former lecturer at the Academy of Justice, Jarosław Sz., accusing him of five sexual offenses, including rape, which are said to have taken place from December 2022 to February 2025. #Gwałt #PrawoKarne #AkademiaWymiaruSprawiedliwości (translated)

In 2025, thanks to my swift reaction and the initiation of an investigation, this lecturer was dismissed from the Academy of Justice. Unfortunately, today Maria Ejchart and Sławomir Cudak reinstated Dr. Jakub Czarkowski, who at that time protected this lecturer, to the position of prorector. Meanwhile, the disciplinary spokesperson who effectively prosecuted this lecturer was dismissed by Messrs. Cudak and Czarkowski. #sprawiedliwość #edukacja #etyka (translated)

President Karol Nawrocki at the inauguration of the academic year like Barack Obama in his heyday. "I got a bit carried away, but I'm landing now because I'm waiting for Professor Czabański's lecture on very important issues. There are 5 million suicides in the world, and in Poland, 5,000. I wish students academic freedom and responsibility for our beloved Republic." PERFECTION. There are few politicians who can do this. A master of this was Barack Obama years ago. First, breaking the serious character of the ceremony with humor, immediately drawing the attention of all of Poland to an important social problem, building pride in that academic community by praising their professor, and at the very end, wishes for students for the new academic year, extending that to the entire Republic. Such skillful maneuvering of emotions and political vectors in such a short time is really not easy. Especially when it has to come out as naturally as it did for Karol Nawrocki at the Academy of Jakub from Paradyż in Gorzów Wielkopolski. #Polska #Edukacja #KarolNawrocki (translated)

Mr. Grzegorz, I read the entire justification. And I agree with one thing – legal analysis cannot be replaced with the label of a "neo-judge," because that is not an argument 🤷‍♂️ However, the justification itself, although extensive and internally organized, in my opinion leaves two very serious legal problems. The first concerns Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision states that in preparatory proceedings, a "blanket warrant" can be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of their objection. Here, the prosecutor filed an objection. The court does not challenge the wording of the provision. It consciously deviates from it, considering that the binding objection of the prosecutor would violate the court's jurisdictional independence. It references Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 178 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 47 of the KPP, and part of the case law of appellate courts. This is a legal argument. But there is also an opposing line of case law, based precisely on the linguistic interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the court itself notes in the justification. I wrote about this yesterday. So it is not the case that there is no problem. There is a very serious dispute about the limits of interpretation contra legem and whether the court can practically deprive the premise, which the legislator explicitly included in the provision. The second problem I have is with the prognostic assessment. The court acknowledges that Romanowski left Poland, did not appear for the hearing concerning the temporary arrest, was outside the reach of Polish authorities, and even informed in his own application that he has a passport issued under a different identity 🤷‍♂️ The court considers these circumstances to be burdensome but then assumes that they cannot determine the assessment because one should look at it primarily prospectively. 🤔 And this is where I have the greatest doubt. The prediction of a suspect's future behavior does not occur in a vacuum. Its foundational material is, after all, their past behavior. 🤷‍♂️ If a person involved in the proceedings previously did not comply with procedural mechanisms, left the country, and remained outside the reach of the authorities, then their later declaration that from this moment they will comply with the conditions of the "blanket warrant" must be subjected to particularly rigorous assessment. The court may conclude that despite this, the risk has currently diminished. But it should convincingly demonstrate why specific past behaviors have lost their prognostic significance. Because if we are to predict a person’s future behavior while disregarding their past behavior, then a rather fundamental question arises - on what basis are we actually building this prediction? 🤷‍♂️ Therefore, I would not dismiss this ruling with the label of a neo-judge, but I would also not say that the problem ends with the justification sounding rational. A rationally constructed justification can still lead to a legally debatable result. In my opinion, this is exactly the kind of case we are dealing with here. The argumentation of the court is clear and can be recounted, but both the way of breaking the literal wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the prognostic assessment of the suspect's behavior leave significant legal doubts. If I were to rule on this matter, I would not grant the application. Firstly – due to the prosecutor's objection and the content of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Secondly – even accepting a different interpretation of this provision, I would not find sufficient grounds for a positive prognostic assessment. This is not about punishing Romanowski for the past. It is about assessing whether his past behavior allows rationally to assume that from this moment he will respect the obligations arising from the "blanket warrant." In my opinion – it does not allow 🤷‍♂️ And that is precisely why there is an appellate review. #prawo #justycja #analizaprawna (translated)

This statement by the current Minister of Justice (and former civil judge!) is shameful. The representative of the executive authority essentially suggests that judges appointed after 2017 are less intelligent, and that if @RomanowskiPL were judging the case, it would not have been dismissed "for substantive reasons" if an alleged old judge were presiding. Mr. Minister @w_zurek, before you go telling the media about the lack of substantive grounds for issuing an iron letter, please familiarize yourself with the jurisprudence of the Appeal Courts in Kraków (e.g., II AKz 523/22), Gdańsk (e.g., II AKz 222/22), or Warsaw (e.g., II AKz 1175/25), and then say that the prosecutor's objection blocks the possibility of issuing the letter. You have dedicated many years of your professional life to fighting against @ZiobroPL and you had the Constitution on your lips, yet now you find the "Ziobro" provision suitable, and you dislike the pro-constitutional interpretation of the regulations, although before 2023 your circle spoke completely differently than you do today. And for how you allow yourself to "ride" on judges publicly due to the fact that you do not like their rulings, you should simply be sued by them. If they do, I will cheer them on. #Sprawiedliwość #Prawo #Sędziowie (translated)

Mr. Minister, here I have a serious problem with your entry - and I'm not talking about Mr. Romanowski, but about the law. Article 281 § 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code indeed states that in preparatory proceedings, a closed list may be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of his objection. However, that is where, in this case, the legal analysis does not end. The Court of Appeals in Gdańsk already on March 29, 2022, II AKz 222/22, ruled that the prosecutor's objection does not bind the court. The same position was held by the Court of Appeals in Szczecin. What is particularly important - the Court of Appeals in Warsaw in the case II AKz 1037/24 indicated that despite the wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court is not bound by the prosecutor's objection. The same applies to the Regional Court in Warsaw, XII Kp 2497/25. So we are not dealing with an interpretation invented today for Romanowski. This dispute has existed in the jurisdiction since 2022 🤷‍♂️ The prosecution can appeal the ruling and present its own arguments. However, the Minister of Justice, a former judge, should perhaps be particularly careful before labeling the court's decision political after an unfavorable ruling for the prosecution, describing the judge as from Ziobro's stable, and reducing his ruling to the principle of "our own protect their own." I would not engage in the rhetoric of the other side here, for which we consistently criticize it 🤷‍♂️ Because this is no longer a polemic with the interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This is attributing political motivation to the judge in a specific, ongoing case 🤷‍♂️ And one more thing - the Constitution is not a shield behind which a judge can hide. It is the highest law of the Republic, Mr. Żurek. Appeal the ruling. Present legal arguments. Let the appellate court decide - this is just the way I would like to see it. This is how the rule of law should look - also when we do not like the court's ruling 🤷‍♂️ #praworządność #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)