Search

NeoJudgeTuleya wrote that in recent hours, information about a possible attack on the prime minister and deputy prime minister was conveyed through special services, and urgent meetings were held at the Anti-Terrorist Center. The author suggested that the threat had been communicated via email and its publicity was an operation intended to divert attention from government problems. As a background, he pointed to the collapse of public finances and record state debt, knife attacks in schools, and scandals at the ministerial level, including the affair of Deputy Minister Kołodziejczak. He wrote that the authorities intentionally directed media attention to the topic of the attack in order to limit the debate on taxes, the budget deficit, and government actions. The author accused the ruling camp of fueling polarization, shifting the blame for mistakes onto political opponents, and appointing individuals who are loyal but, as he assessed, lacking competence. He also claimed that the alert about the attack was intended to provide the government with political benefits, justify state operating costs, and silence the opposition. He mentioned the creation of enemies, including the opposition and President Nawrocki. #polityka #manipulacja #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Mateusz Morawiecki criticized the morning briefing convened by Prime Minister Tusk, which involved ministers, heads of services, and representatives of state institutions. He wrote that less information was shared after the meeting with the public than before and called for concrete actions for the safety of children. Morawiecki expressed concern regarding the tragic events and extended condolences to the families of the victims and those affected. He also thanked teachers, rescuers, and officials. He claimed that for three years he has been warning about the harmful influence of smartphones, algorithms, and social media on children, highlighting access to hate, violence, manipulation, and dangerous content. He described the ban on phones in schools as insufficient, as children still use devices after classes. He informed that Rozwój Plus proposed a ban on social media usage for individuals under 15 years of age, to be enforced by platforms, as well as severe financial penalties and legal liability for digital companies regarding harmful content and deceptive advertisements. He also advocated for support for parents, teachers, and educators. Morawiecki emphasized that protecting children should not lead to the restriction of adults' freedom of speech, and he opposed solutions that would allow for preventive censorship. He demanded from the Prime Minister specific draft laws, deadlines for their implementation, and identification of those responsible for their execution. He assessed that the safety of children would not be ensured by further briefings, but by decisions and responsibility. #BezpieczeństwoDzieci #Polska #Rodzice (translated)

John Bingham described the ruling team as cynical and claimed that it based its maintenance of power on manipulation and political PR. He expected the media to ask about the issue of the "assassination attempt on the prime minister": whether the threat signal was confirmed before the announcement was published, who decided to make it public, and what effect it was supposed to have on security. He also asked whether the decision was consulted with the ABW (Internal Security Agency) and SOP (Government Protective Bureau), whether an update was to be provided after assessing the credibility of the threat, and what operational or protective benefit announcing the possibility of an assassination on the highest representatives of the authorities gave before presenting the verification results. #polityka #media #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The Institute of Truth wrote that in December 2014, Daniel Obajtek testified as a witness in the trial of Roman and Józef Lis, who were accused of fraudulently obtaining around 200 thousand złoty in EU subsidies. According to the institute, Obajtek denied at that time that he was a silent partner of TT Plast and stated that he owned shares briefly, many years before assuming the office of the mayor of Pcim. He was also said to have testified that as mayor he did not hold any positions in the company nor managed it, and did not collaborate with an employee named Szymon. The institute reminded that in February 2021, "Gazeta Wyborcza" published recordings of conversations from 2009 in which Obajtek allegedly discussed clients, taking over contracts from Elektroplast, and matters concerning TT Plast. The newspaper reported that employees of the company referred to Obajtek as a silent partner. In 2016, Roman Lis filed a report of suspected false testimony and attached recordings. The prosecutor's office refused to initiate an investigation after about a month, finding that there were no signs of a prohibited act. According to the Institute of Truth, Obajtek denied breaking the law, admitted that he had once been a shareholder and knew the owners, but maintained that as mayor he did not work for TT Plast or any other company, and the recordings did not prove a crime. Orlen's office described the publication as a manipulation based on recordings of undetermined integrity. The institute assessed that the testimonies about the lack of professional relations with the company and not managing it did not withstand confrontation with the recordings. #InstytutPrawdy #Obajtek #prawo #korupcja (translated)

Dr. Coolfonpl assessed that the draft law 3003 created a system of repression that could threaten anyone. According to him, sanctions could be imposed for serious violations of human rights, recognizing someone as a threat to democracy or the rule of law, foreign interference, or manipulating information. He wrote that decisions could be made by 10 state institutions, they would be immediately enforceable, and the possibilities for appeal would be limited. He described the draft as a "supercensorship" system and justified this assessment by saying that the threat to democracy can be defined in various ways. #PrawaCzłowieka #Demokracja #Cenzura (translated)

The author wrote that there was a discussion in Poland about the alleged pressure from the Americans to change the prime minister, although — as he noted — there was no confirmation that this topic was raised during the conversation of the Minister of National Defense in the USA. He added that externally funded campaigns to manipulate Poles were an element of an attempt to exert influence. #Polska #Polityka #Manipulacja #PL #US (translated)

Kamil Zaradkiewicz wrote that candidates for judges supported by a specific environment are not, in his opinion, even subjected to verification of formal criteria, such as professional experience. He added that when the "guardians of the system" consider a candidate to be on the opposite side, they are capable of vilifying him, spreading lies, and using manipulations that he compared to Goebbels' methods. #sędziowie #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Pan Diabeł Stockton wrote that lies and manipulation were the last, yet still dangerous weapon of PiS and its media allies. He announced the publication of another list, covering over 100 trolls and bots, which he attributed to the Szefernaker farm. It was supposed to be released that day around 6 PM. He also thanked for every coffee offered to him and emphasized that this support meant a lot to him. https://t.co/dwmGJYuZdH https://t.co/p4nV8Gaoe6 #kłamstwo #manipulacja #media (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that the only established information was that Radosław Sikorski demanded a note regarding the conversation between Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz and Donald Trump. In his opinion, the request for the note alone did not prove that Kosiniak-Kamysz did not inform the government about the conversation, did not trust Sikorski, or doubted Bogdan Klich's competence. The author accused Marcin Przydacz of presenting such interpretations and the suggestion of "some game" as conclusions drawn from the facts. He stated that building the message about the political conflict in this way constitutes manipulation of public opinion and is unbecoming of an employee of the Chancellery of the President. He called on Przydacz to provide evidence for his claims. #fakty #polityka #manipulacja (translated)

Chrzanik described the conversation between Gawkowski and Rymanowski, in which the question was raised about how the government intends to fight misinformation, since according to Demagog, 38 percent of the prime minister's statements and 23 percent of the government's spokesperson's statements were true. Gawkowski replied that a Center for Combating Disinformation had been established, which is supposed to deal with manipulation coming from Russia rather than political opponents. Chrzanik ironically added that the center would probably first focus on correcting the statements of opposition politicians. #dezinformacja #manipulacja #polityka (translated)

Michał Szczerba accused Nawrocki's people of more evasions, lies, and manipulations. He wrote that the horses had been in the stable since the 1990s, but they were bought in the last year, and the stableman earned more than the prime minister. He added that PiS politicians believed that everything was owed to them and described them as greedy and insatiable people he had known for years. #polityka #manipulacja #kłamstwo (translated)

The author of the post thanked Marcin Przydacz for the special distinction and wrote that he feels obliged by it. He stated that the block will not change his actions: he still intends to tag Przydacz and show the Polish and foreign public his manipulations, untrue assertions, and messages that do not withstand confrontation with facts. He added that he accepts the block as a response to correcting Przydacz's statements, but emphasized that facts cannot be blocked. #polityka #manipulacja #dyskurspubliczny (translated)

The author of the entry accused Bogucki of manipulating the message about Nawrocki's decisions and questioned the claim that each of them stemmed solely from concern for Poles. He pointed out that political calculations, ideological disputes, and his own strategy could also stand behind the vetoes. He requested clarification on, among other things, the veto against the wind farm bill combined with solutions concerning energy prices, and then the presentation of his own project containing some of those solutions; the veto against the SAFE act regarding financing security and defense; and the referral of the act on extraordinary profits of fuel companies to the Constitutional Tribunal. He also asked about the vetoes against laws about the active farmer, the principles of practicing the profession by some doctors from outside the EU, the status of a close person, regulations of the cryptocurrency market — which were vetoed twice — and the amendment of the so-called Lex Kamilek. The author noted that Nawrocki had the right to use the veto power and conduct his own policy, although he still had fundamental doubts about the constitutional basis of his office's functioning. In his opinion, however, it was necessary to openly discuss the political, constitutional, economic, ideological, and strategic motives behind decisions, rather than presenting one's own actions as serving Poland, while portraying the government's actions as blackmail or a political game. He compared such a narrative to Trump's politics, where — as he wrote — one's own actions are presented as the state's interest, while opponents' actions are depicted as betrayal or blackmail. He added that Poland's system differed from the system of the United States and emphasized that he had provided just a few examples, without a detailed analysis of subsequent vetoes, laws, and statements. #Polska #polityka #demokracja (translated)

The author of the entry questioned Kania's claim about "hundreds of scientific publications" by Karol Nawrocki. He referred to the official IPN biography, according to which Nawrocki wrote seven books and several dozen scientific and journalistic articles, as well as to the biography on the website of the President of Poland, which mentions several dozen scientific and popular science publications. He indicated that Nawrocki's leadership of the Museum of the Second World War and the IPN does not justify, in his opinion, defining these institutions as the largest educational and research facilities in Poland. The author accused Kania of exaggerating Nawrocki's achievements and reducing Radosław Sikorski's accomplishments to his estate in Chobielin and his wife Anne Applebaum. He pointed out Oxford, Sikorski's international activities, and his roles as Minister of Defense, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Speaker of the Sejm, and Member of the European Parliament. He added that Sikorski's statement could be criticized, but he did not believe that its history was fabricated. He also criticized Kania for basing the correction on what he called hyperboles and omissions. #nauka #publikacje #Polska (translated)

A forty-member team of PR specialists unanimously decided to dip the President's thumb in an inkwell to rule out any assumptions of using AI, but also to identify the leaders of embarrassment and the king of manipulation. The team's idea proved effective. P.S. Such things happen to people who are not afraid of work. #PR #liderzy #manipulacja (translated)

Javier Tebas, president of La Liga, strikes back at the content of Real Madrid TV on social media: "I respond to the user AdriiRM33, who posted a video from Real Madrid TV, in which he lies, distorts facts, and hides the motivation and purpose of the AUDIOVISUAL NEW AGED operation, and moreover ignores dozens of explanations regarding this matter. As a source, he cites La Galerna – another portal spreading the same version of events. I am attaching two examples of transfers from Real Madrid to AUDIOVISUAL NEW AGED. Between 2011 and 2013, the club's transfers to this company totaled 7,513,333.55 euros. Yes, to the same company that FC Barcelona was depositing money into. What a surprise! Ask JAS and Chitín del Valle why these transfers were made and what their purpose was. Let Chitín explain the content of the email from May 9, 2018, and who instructed him to send that message. Pass these documents to RM TV and let them shoot another film. This time explaining what they are currently hiding. To be continued... No more lies, manipulations." #LaLiga #RealMadryt #Futbol (translated)

Donald Tusk testuje nową formę „podcastowego orędzia”. Zamiast konferencji, mównicy czy kilkunastosekundowej riposty na X - usiadł przy mikrofonie i spokojnie wyjaśnił mechanizm wysokich cen paliw oraz rozwiązanie proponowane przez rząd. Sam materiał szybko przekroczył milion wyświetleń na X. To istotne, bo nośnikiem nie jest KPRM ani konkretna platforma - jest nim premier dysponujący milionowymi zasięgami na różnych platformach. W przypadku paliw było co tłumaczyć. Rząd wiąże wzrost cen z sytuacją na światowych rynkach i zakłóceniami dostaw, a proponowany podatek od nadzwyczajnych zysków firm paliwowych ma przynieść ok. 4 mld zł i finansować działania osłonowe, w tym obniżenie obciążeń podatkowych paliw. Opozycja i otoczenie prezydenta przedstawiają sprawę inaczej - wskazują https://t.co/qPNdq9HYaR. na możliwość obniżenia cen innymi instrumentami i krytykują przerzucanie odpowiedzialności na prezydenta. Podcast daje premierowi przestrzeń, żeby zamiast odpowiadać sloganem na slogan przedstawić obywatelowi cały mechanizm i własne argumenty. Potencjał tego formatu bierze się również ze sposobu działania współczesnych platform. Już wcześniejsze analizy aktywności europejskich liderów na TikToku wskazywały Tuska wśród polityków osiągających bardzo wysokie liczby wyświetleń, a treści “humanizujące” polityków należą do formatów generujących duże zaangażowanie. Jeden kilkuminutowy podcast może jednocześnie być pełnym wyjaśnieniem na YouTube czy X i źródłem kilkunastu krótkich klipów na TikToka, Reels czy Shorts. To potencjalnie viralowe orędzie przystosowane do internetu zamiast telewizji. Jest jeszcze drugi efekt - wizerunkowy. PiS przez dwie dekady konsekwentnie budował negatywny obraz Tuska manipulacjami i zwykłymi kłamstwami. Podcast nie unieważnia tej wieloletniej narracji, ale omija jej filtr. Odbiorca przez kilka minut obserwuje premiera mówiącego własnym głosem, spokojnie i współczesnym językiem medialnym. Dla części obywateli może to być kontakt nie z groźnym wizerunkiem premiera stworzonym przez jego przeciwników, lecz bezpośrednio z Tuskiem jako człowiekiem. Co więcej, Tusk już w exposé w 2023 r. obiecywał comiesięczne otwarte spotkania, podczas których miał zdawać obywatelom raport z tego, co rząd zrobił, co się udało i gdzie pojawiły się problemy. Późniejsza odpowiedź KPRM na interpelację dotyczącą realizacji tej zapowiedzi wskazywała przede wszystkim inne kanały komunikacji rządu, zamiast wykazać realizację cyklu takich comiesięcznych spotkań. Podcast nie zastąpi rozmowy twarzą w twarz i pytań obywateli, ale może realizować część pierwotnej idei znacznie szerzej: regularnie tłumaczyć milionom ludzi decyzje i działania państwa - bez pośredników i zewnętrznej narracji. Z perspektywy walki z dezinformacją najważniejsze jest właśnie połączenie zasięgu z czasem. Fałszywa lub uproszczona narracja może zmieścić się w jednym zdaniu, podczas gdy jej sprostowanie często wymaga pokazania przyczyn, danych i zależności. Premier posiadający własną dużą publiczność może stworzyć stały punkt odniesienia: jeden temat, kilka minut, źródła, decyzja rządu, jej koszty i ograniczenia. Warunek jest jeden - materiał musi pozwalać odbiorcy sprawdzić przedstawiane informacje, bo inaczej podcast stanie się po prostu kolejnym kanałem politycznego przekazu. Wniosek: pojedynczy film jest eksperymentem. Regularny podcast premiera mógłby stać się nowoczesnym odpowiednikiem orędzia - mniej ceremonialnym, bardziej osobistym i zaprojektowanym pod mechanikę mediów społecznościowych. Może również zmieniać sposób, w jaki część obywateli postrzega samego Tuska, bo daje mu możliwość bezpośredniego kontaktu z odbiorcą po latach intensywnego negatywnego przekazu jego przeciwników. To nie gwarantuje zmiany opinii, ale zmienia warunki, w których obywatel ją wyrabia. Ocena Doświadczeń Obywatela: 8/10 ✅ Rekomendacja: jeśli rząd uzna ten format za wartościowy, powinien wdrożyć go konsekwentnie jako regularny kanał informacyjny premiera: jeden aktualny problem, spokojne wyjaśnienie, dane i źródła widoczne na ekranie, wskazanie tego, co rząd zrobił, czego nie zrobił i dlaczego. W kampanii taki format może mieć dużą wartość komunikacyjną, ale z perspektywy państwa jego istotniejszą funkcją byłoby skrócenie dystansu informacyjnego między władzą a obywatelem. — #PolitycznyUX @PolitycznyUX #Polityka #Podcast #Tusk