Search

Chrzanik described the exchange of words between Kołodziejczak and Rutkowski, in which a question was raised about whether it is a matter of slander or if the interlocutor feels guilty. In response, the interlocutor reportedly said that what happens behind closed doors is more important to him than in front of the cameras. Chrzanik commented that even Bareja would not have invented such a duo. https://t.co/ZJqjGNtozi #kołodziejczak #rutkowski #polityka (translated)

Pope Leo XIV wrote that the death penalty violates the inviolability and dignity of man, and the common good and justice can be protected without its application. He pointed out that there are effective prison systems that protect citizens while also allowing the convicted the opportunity for improvement and redemption. #NieDlaKaryŚmierci #NoDeathPenalty #KaraŚmierci #PrawaCzłowieka #Sprawiedliwość (translated)

Professor Penguin ironically assessed the reaction shown in the recording as excellent, adding that it was not at all evident that the person was guilty. He expressed hope that the material would be included in every crisis management manual. https://t.co/FqgSqRBJZr #zarządzanie #sytuacjekryzysowe #wideo (translated)

Michal Rachoń claimed that the preparations for the crimes took a long time, and the evidence available on the internet indicated that the perpetrators were using international patterns. He assessed that the services subordinate to Donald Tusk and Marcin Kierwiński did not notice this information because they were busy pursuing political opponents. Rachoń wrote that Kierwiński was looking for those responsible but blamed journalists who had reached information overlooked by him. He announced that Republika TV would continue to inform about threats and warn viewers, accusing Tusk and Kierwiński of concentrating on fighting the media and opposition instead. #polityka #media #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The President wrote that in her criticized message, blame was placed on Tusk and leftist ideology, while curator Nowak was said to propose a return to the Christian model of civilization. As examples of her statements, she mentioned stories about masturbation rooms in Swedish kindergartens, referring to vaccinations as experiments, and prayers for the healing of gay people. The author accused Nowak of inconsistency: she contrasted her condemnation of students' lawlessness with Nawrocki, who — as she wrote — invoked freedom. She also asked whether the presence of Skolim and Kubańczyk at Nawrocki's in Jurata fit into the vision of education promoted by Nowak. The President added that PiS allocated zero for the children's support line 116 111, and asked whether this was a sign of concern or if prayer was sufficient. She also reminded Nowak that the prohibition against bearing false witness belongs to Christianity. #Polska #Tusk #cywilizacja_chrześcijańska (translated)

Piotr Stanisław Wielgucki wrote that Donald Tusk convened a special government meeting to deliver good news. He used an offensive term referring to the Prime Minister's German origins, and blamed Karol Nawrocki for the situation, who vetoed the law regarding internet censorship. He added that the same law will soon be back on the President's desk, and if signed, fuel will cost 5.19 PLN. #Polska #cenzura #paliwo (translated)

The commentator wrote that Adam Bielan admitted to seeking a meeting between Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz and Donald Trump, as well as meetings with many other important European politicians. The author stated that such politicians are exactly what is needed and that this is how diplomacy is conducted. #dyplomacja #polityka #SpotkaniaPolityczne (translated)

Gutab wrote that after the topic of the conversation between Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz and Donald Trump was revealed, panic broke out. He claimed that they were looking for those to blame, attacking the opposition, and demanding something without specifying what. He compared shifting responsibility to a game of "hot potato" and asked if the evacuation backpacks were already packed. #polityka #Trump #opozycja (translated)

This was just what this series was missing: ALAB is back in the game, searching for those responsible for its leak from its infrastructure. And demands that UODO appoint experts 🫠 What absolute cinema. #seriale #ALAB #UODO (translated)

Former world snooker champion Graeme Dott, convicted of sexual offenses against children, has been found guilty of "lascivious, indecent and immoral behavior," which has ended his sports career and leads to his permanent removal from the Snooker Hall of Fame. #GraemeDott #snooker #grooming (translated)

Mr. Czarnek, since we are already making this a bill for the government's policy, let's check the entire bill, not just the politically convenient items. Is inflation rising? Yes, but from the fact that fuel prices drive up CPI, it does not automatically follow that the increase in fuel prices is a result of the Polish government's decisions. 🤦‍♂️ That is simply a mistake in your reasoning or a deliberate manipulation of public opinion, because the effect of fuel prices on inflation does not determine the cause of fuel prices themselves. 🤷‍♂️ The Central Statistical Office indeed indicated transport, especially fuel, as a significant factor in price growth. I read that too, but it did not state anywhere: that is Donald Tusk's responsibility. You keep reminding us of Mr. Tusk's words, that he promised 5.19 zł. Yes. In June 2022. However, if statements from several years ago are to be an indefinite guarantee of fuel prices regardless of oil prices, war, sanctions, the dollar exchange rate, and the situation on the world market, then I propose to apply this method consistently. 🤷‍♂️ In 2011, Jarosław Kaczyński said: "The excise tax can simply be lowered. If it is lowered, the price of gasoline will also fall." At that time, the price of Pb95 was around 5.14 zł. Ten years later, already under the PiS government, the same Jarosław Kaczyński explained that the excise tax should not be lowered because it limits the state's revenue. 🤦‍♂️ So I understand that old declarations are valid forever, but only for politicians from the opposing camp? 🙂 Later you again claim that high fuel prices are the government's policy. No, Mr. Czarnek. The government influences taxes, some regulations, and support instruments - and that's all. However, it does not determine the world price of oil, does not control the supply of fuel, the dollar exchange rate, or the geopolitical situation. 🤷‍♂️ And since we are so eager to find politicians responsible for the current tensions in the energy market, it might be worth taking a look at Donald ... but Trump, your idol, and his policy towards Iran. Only then does your narrative become a bit less convenient. You claim that more expensive fuel means more expensive transport, production, and pressure on prices. Yes. That is actually true. But again - describing the effects of expensive fuel does not prove that the cause of expensive fuel is Tusk. Professor, you can really criticize the government; there are plenty of such issues or decisions. But maybe without equating: fuel is getting more expensive -> inflation is rising -> therefore Tusk is to blame. 🤦‍♂️ It is really becoming very irritating. #Polityka #Inflacja #CenyPaliw (translated)

Mr. Bogucki, it's just that this story is already starting to contradict itself. First, for months we hear about a record deficit, an incredible budget hole, and a government that supposedly cannot manage the state's finances 🤷‍♂️ And now the solution is a project that includes, among other things, exempting fuel sales from the retail sales tax and the ability to lower excise duties. In other words, put simply—reducing public revenues 🤷‍♂️ And that's where the magic begins. Because if the budget gets less money, then this shortfall has to be either covered by other revenues, or cut somewhere in expenditures, or increase the deficit. There is no fourth way and a drawer labeled "money from nowhere" (the NBP also doesn't have it) And I can already see the next conferences of people from the office's surroundings: the government raised other taxes - bad; the government cut expenditures - bad; the government increased the deficit - scandal, budget hole - government should resign! So regardless of the solution, the government and Tusk will of course be to blame. At the same time, when the government proposes a temporary tax on extraordinary profits of fuel companies, with revenues expected to be around 4 billion PLN and intended precisely to compensate for the loss from VAT and excise duties in protective measures, we also hear - no! So let's finally establish: drivers should pay less, concerns should not pay tax on extraordinary profits, other taxes should not be raised, expenditures should not be cut, the deficit should also not be increased. So could you please specify where exactly these missing billions should come from 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ Because economics, unlike your flowery statements, unfortunately has to balance 🤷‍♂️ #ekonomia #budżet #Polska (translated)

Good morning! If I may lie a little. Someone recently asked me what government scandal would have to come to light for that metaphorical Jagodno with Wilanów to let go of Tusk? I answered that a drunken Tusk would have to run over Kacprzyk's Porsche at a crosswalk while holding a transcript of the marital act in his hand, going on a date with Berk. And please forgive me for my lack of delicacy, but the German media have raised 30% of unconscious idiots among us, for whom there is no chance for any processes of thought anymore. For these people, there is simply no hope. They still count the votes after all. This is a diagnosis. Simply. And not to take it into account, but to never make that mistake again and not let the Germans create media in Poland. Oh right! The media! Since we live in a country of miracles and smiles, I was surprised by a certain subversive piece of information from Polsat about a 52-year-old lady Agnieszka from Piła, who had a serious accident a year ago. The woman underwent hand surgery, but over time her fingers began to stiffen. Today she has problems performing the simplest tasks, and a doctor from the Dega Hospital in Poznań allegedly recommended finger reconstruction. She received the referral urgently. The date of the operation? October 1, 2035. Yes. In 9 years. I simply do not believe it. We have fuel at 5.19 zł, and Professor Markowski insists it should be much more expensive because the poorest are losing out on how cheap it is. After all, Doctor Kacprzyk, as part of the "serious consequences" announced by Prime Minister Tusk and spokesman Szłapka after the Southern Hospital scandal, not only has to drive a Mazda, but also has to have it all in his ass. And finally, Minister Cienkowska allocated 148 thousand zł for a fashion show in which she herself performed, and at the end disgusted everyone with a statement that her participation aimed to promote the work of a designer from Ukraine and support an aid program for people with migration experience. Dear Minister! The Prime Minister of the government in which you serve has caused over a million young Poles to benefit from migration experiences through previous governments. It truly disgusts me that you had the audacity to say something like that to Poles right in the face, although I understand due to intellectual deficits. Your Germanization of our politics is manifesting itself in your ordinary, simple blatantness. However, let's get down from the theater roof to the ground. It's not easy in heels. If a person with a malfunctioning hand hears: "operation in nine years," politicians should be aware that every photograph from the next publicly funded event will simply irritate people. Not because culture is unnecessary. Because a person expects basic things from the state above all. A doctor. Security. An efficient office. A school. A court. A road. A hospital where the word "urgent" means urgent, not "maybe in the next decade." And who is to blame for this? I have bad news. Us. Let’s finally start to take our own state seriously. Not like a show, where it's enough for a politician to look good on television, post a spiteful tweet, strap a mole down in a plane, and for the next four years can do whatever he wants. The state is our money, our taxes, our hospitals, our security, and our lives. Democracy has one brutally simple rule: politicians get as much impunity as citizens are willing to give them. And when I hear that the constitutional minister will starve the Constitutional Tribunal, that the police, at the Prime Minister's command, will enter institutions, and that Ms. Agnieszka from Piła has to wait 9 years for surgery, I throw up my hands because obviously Poles do not want their own state but rather a regional EU entity. 👉 However, if you would like to have a normal state, not a Kacprzykokracja: Buy me a coffee: https://t.co/8NPL5yAO8g https://t.co/8NPL5yAO8g #Polska #media #demokracja (translated)

Panie Leśkiewicz, mam nadzieję, że w końcu zdobędzie się Pan na odwagę i odpowie mi publicznie. W końcu "po pierwsze Polacy" - tak? Skoro Kancelaria twierdzi, że ten projekt "doprowadzi do realnej obniżki cen paliw", to postanowiłem pokrótce przedstawić opinii publicznej jego rzeczywistą treść. Nie konferencję prasową. Nie hasła. Nie marketing polityczny jak macie państwo w zwyczaju robić a: Projekt ustawy. Bo mam wrażenie, że właśnie tego elementu w państwa wypowiedziach konsekwentnie brakuje. Bo z samego tekstu ustawy wynika coś znacznie mniej efektownego 🤷‍♂️ Po pierwsze: maksymalne marże nie zostają ustalone ustawą. Projekt stanowi jedynie, że po spełnieniu określonych przesłanek Rada Ministrów MOŻE wydać rozporządzenie i dopiero w nim określić wysokość marż. Sam projekt nie mówi, czy będzie to 20 groszy, 50 groszy czy 1 zł. Nie mówi też, że rozporządzenie musi zostać wydane 🤷‍♂️ Po drugie: z akcyzą jest dokładnie tak samo. Minister Finansów MOŻE ją obniżyć. Nie musi. Państwa własne uzasadnienie przyznaje wprost, że skali skutków finansowych nie da się dokładnie oszacować, bo zależy ona od tego, czy minister w ogóle skorzysta z tej możliwości, na jak długo i w jakiej wysokości.🤦‍♂️ Po trzecie: projektodawca - pan Nawrocki, sam przyznaje, że obniżenie podatków pośrednich nie gwarantuje pełnego przełożenia korzyści na ceny detaliczne. Mimo to Kancelaria publicznie mówi o "natychmiastowej" obniżce i operuje kwotami rzędu 1,70–2,60 zł na litrze, choć takiej gwarancji w ustawie po prostu nie ma 🤦‍♂️ Po czwarte: Projekt automatycznie zmniejsza dochody budzetu z podatku od sprzedaży detalicznej, według własnego uzasadnienia nawet o 600 mln zł. Ewentualna obniżka akcyzy oznaczałaby dalszy ubytek dochodów, którego projektodawca sam nie potrafi dziś określić 🤦‍♂️ I tu zaczyna się problem zasadniczy. Art. 118 ust. 3 Konstytucji wymaga przedstawienia skutków finansowych projektu. Regulamin Sejmu wymaga ponadto wskazania źródeł finansowania, jeżeli projekt pociąga za sobą obciążenie budżetu 🤷‍♂️ Nie wystarczy więc napisać: minister może obniżyć akcyzę, rząd może ograniczyć marże, a następnie ogłosić obywatelom, że Prezydent obniży ceny paliw 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Bo Prezydent w tym projekcie cen paliw NIE OBNIŻA !. Tworzy instrumenty, których użycie pozostawia innym organom ! Rządowi. Ministrowi Finansów. Organom wykonawczym. A potem powstaje bardzo wygodna konstrukcja polityczna: Prezydent chciał. Rząd nie zrobił, Minister Finansów nie obniżył. Cena nie spadła? Winny rząd ! Cena spadła, ale kosztem kolejnego ubytku dochodów państwa? Prezydent może ogłosić sukces, a odpowiedzialność za deficyt nadal pozostaje po stronie rządu 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ W mojej opinii właśnie dlatego ten projekt jest tak zle skonstruowany, ja nawet nie nazwałbym tego "projektem ustawy". Odpowiedzialny projektodawca powinien pokazać realny mechanizm, realny koszt, realne źródło jego pokrycia i realny skutek prawny. A nie napisać ustawę, w której najważniejsze decyzje mają później podejmować inni, po czym już na etapie kampanii informacyjnej przypisywać sobie przyszły sukces. Tak się nie pisze dobrej ustawy. Tak się pisze bardzo wygodny polityczny alibi. I naprawdę nie trzeba wierzyć mi na słowo. Wystarczy przeczytać art. 34b projektu oraz jego własne uzasadnienie 🤷‍♂️ Więc mam jedno małe, ale zasadnicze pytanie, panie Leśkiewicz: czy Pan w ogóle czytał ten projekt, czy ktoś po prostu kazał Panu powtarzać takie bzdury? Odpowie Pan merytorycznie, czy znowu schowa głowę w piasek ? #Polska #prawo #polityka