Search

Alex Vanopslagh wrote that Liberal Alliance's Mads Strange had asked a person who described himself as a conservative Muslim in the TV 2 program Højskolen on Wednesday if it was a problem that only 16 percent of Muslim men in Denmark believed that homosexuality was acceptable. According to Vanopslagh, the person rejected that it was a problem and would not answer what he personally thought about homosexuality. Vanopslagh wrote that he disagreed and considered homophobia to be among the least Danish things. He believed that Muslims could be Danish if they supported the fundamental values of democracy and had embraced Denmark. As a member of parliament, he claimed to have both the right and the duty to establish the requirements for Danish citizenship. He wrote that applicants should at a minimum acknowledge the precedence of Danish law over religious laws, an individual's right to make choices about his life, and equal rights for homosexuals. They should also not support Islamist regimes or terrorist movements. Therefore, Liberal Alliance would screen applicants and say no to individuals who had praised terrorism, supported Hamas or similar organizations, threatened people who left Islam, or acted hostile towards homosexuals, he wrote. Vanopslagh wrote that the government would reintroduce a bill on citizenship for 2,055 individuals. He referred to the government's own statement that applicants' values should be screened, but that the screening should not apply to the 2,055 individuals. According to him, this risked allowing Islamists, rabid anti-Semites, or anti-democrats to gain citizenship. Liberal Alliance would not vote for more citizenships until the screening was in place, Vanopslagh wrote. He described Danish citizenship as a gift rather than a right. #Danmark #Statsborgerskab #LiberalAlliance (translated)

The Baron of Øresund wrote that a new video, in his opinion, showed a Danish helicopter flying close to a Russian warship, and that the helicopter may have itself been the provocateur in the episode. He referred to Defense Minister Jeppe Bruus calling the video a Russian misinformation campaign and saying that some of the material did not originate from the day in question. The Baron of Øresund asked which parts did, and whether it included the footage of the helicopter near the ship. If it did, he believed that the Russians were justified in reacting as they did, under international law. He wrote that the Folketing and the media should demand answers, but that he did not have high hopes that they would do so. #forsvarspolitik #russiskkrig #modinformation (translated)

Jonatan Pallesen wrote to Rasmus Jarlov that Jarlov voted in 2015 to grant citizenship to 5,365 people from outside Europe as well as 4,210 children who accompanied them. Pallesen wrote that this might have been the largest number ever granted through a legislative proposal. Pallesen suggested that Jarlov could write if he now regretted his vote. He encouraged him to describe that mass grants of citizenship, according to Pallesen, had the serious consequence that career criminals among foreigners could not be deported, and that it had led to many victims of violence and sexual assault. He also suggested that Jarlov call the grant a mistake and expressed hope that the Danish Parliament would avoid repeating it. #statsborgerskab #udlændinge #politikk (translated)

Nadja Natalie Isaksen wrote that she had been in court the day before to see Nkumba Ludovic Tshiembe and hear his explanation. She wanted to assess his body language herself and get a sense of whether he regretted it, as she believed it could not be properly evaluated through the media coverage. She described it as unbearable to see Christian Johan Zedig's family in court and his wife crying. According to Isaksen, the wife said the case had destroyed everything. She wrote that the pain of Christian's family was hard to understand solely through media coverage, and that lawmakers should therefore attend court to see the consequences of the policies adopted by the Parliament. Isaksen called the one-year sentence unfair. She wrote that Tshiembe, in her impression, appeared affected, often looking down at the table or covering his face with his hands, and had difficulty looking at Zedig's wife. She recounted that Tshiembe had said that he felt terrible, but added that it could not bring Christian back. She believed that Tshiembe should be stripped of his Danish citizenship and permanently expelled. She referred to the fact that he had been convicted of aggravated assault and rape in 2014 and attempted murder in 2017, and wrote that the two girls would otherwise have had their father today. #Retten #Uretfærdighed #Justits (translated)

Mona Juul wrote that she rarely gave space to political opponents and colleagues on her side, but this time she thought it was important to highlight their warnings about misinformation. She mentioned, among other things, that Stinus Lindgreen from the Radical Left had written about daily Russian misinformation on social media and his concern that parts of the population had lost trust in the authorities. According to Juul, Karsten Hønge from SF had described lies and manipulations from the Kremlin, while Troels Lund Poulsen from the Liberal party had talked about anonymous profiles, conspiracy theories, and accusations directed at him. Alex Vanopslagh from the Liberal Alliance had written that Russia spread propaganda, and Ida Auken had warned that actors from St. Petersburg influenced who won Danish elections. Juul wrote that she herself saw conspiracy theories, deliberate misinformation, AI-generated lies, and Russian bot accounts on social media. She called the development a challenge for Danish democracy and believed that politicians must stand together because the truth was under pressure. She highlighted Danish news media and journalists as important for democratic information because the media had accountable editors-in-chief and were responsible to the Danish people and the Press Council. At the same time, she warned against videos on X, whose authenticity could not be established. Juul thanked her political colleagues for addressing coordinated misinformation and said that Russia wanted to create distrust among people. In response, she called for solidarity. #Misinformation #Demokrati #Sammenhold (translated)

Magnus Barsøe criticized that the 31-year-old Nkumba Ludovic Tshiembe had supposedly received one year in prison for killing a family man. He wrote that Tshiembe had previously been convicted of rape and attempted murder, and called the sentence, as well as a one-year nightlife ban, insufficient. Barsøe called for minimum sentences inspired by the USA, although he did not advocate for the American legal system. He believed that greater alignment between the court’s sentences and the public’s wishes was necessary to maintain trust in the rule of law, and that the current gap harmed democracy and was deeply unfair to the victims of crime. #retsstat #strafferet #retfærdighed (translated)

Jonas Zuschke wrote that AfD had elected its first ever state parliament president with a broad and secure majority. He claimed that the party's political firewall had been broken, as both BSW, which he said had promised to vote for the AfD candidate Rausch, and others had voted for him. Zuschke described the election as the beginning of a patriotic wave from eastern Germany, which in his assessment would spread to the rest of the country and Europe. #Tyskland #AfD #Politik (translated)

Nadja Natalie Isaksen wrote that the trial against an African man in the case of lethal violence at Islands Brygge began today. She stated that the victim was Christian Zedig, who was a husband and father of two small girls, and that the accused faced 8-10 months in prison. Isaksen also wrote that the case had received extensive media coverage, including from Swedish media, and that she was the only member of Parliament present. #Retssag #Danmark #Dødsvold (translated)

Magnus Barsøe wrote that Denmark should establish an investment fund inspired by Norway together with Mayor Michael Vindfeldt. They presented the proposal in Berlingske and called the fund "Denmark's Generational Fund." Barsøe compared Norway's sovereign fund, which he claimed had nearly 22 trillion Norwegian kroner, with Denmark's economy. He wrote that the treasury had an overall surplus of nearly 500 billion kroner from 2021 to 2025, and argued that the money should be invested instead of being used for political priorities. The proposal included a starting capital of between 100 and 150 billion kroner from the state's account in the National Bank, as well as annual state contributions of ten billion kroner for ten years. According to Barsøe, the investments should be widely spread across foreign stocks and managed independently of politicians. He also suggested a cap of two percent on the fund's annual payouts. If the fund started with 150 billion kroner, Barsøe claimed it could grow to about 500 billion kroner in 20 years and then send nearly ten billion kroner a year to welfare. He wrote that the fund should help pass on values to future generations and noted that Denmark's "oil" was labor. #Danmark #Økonomi #Investering (translated)

Morten Messerschmidt wrote that the blue bloc stood united in rejecting Henrik Frandsen as a candidate for the position of Speaker of the Folketing. After the Alternative also stated that the party would reject him, it was, according to Messerschmidt, the government majority along with the Red-Green Alliance that determined the outcome of today's meeting. He criticized the Red-Green Alliance for overlooking what had recently come to light about Frandsen and called it a sign that the party had become conformist. Messerschmidt wrote that for him, the issue concerned the institution of the Folketing and not Frandsen as a person. He believed that the position of Speaker required parliamentary experience and authority, and that the Speaker should safeguard the independence of the Folketing from the government. Messerschmidt also wrote that, in his assessment, Frandsen would not become the trusted man of the Folketing, but was primarily Lars Løkke Rasmussen's man. This strengthened his belief, according to the post, that it was the right decision to make himself available for the Presidium of the Folketing. He added that the Danish People's Party would ensure the greatest possible resistance to what he described as the government's overreach leading up to the next parliamentary election. #Folketinget #politik #Demokrati (translated)

Mitchel Oliver wrote that the Parliament would open the day after, even though the political season had not yet begun. He mentioned the drone scandal, the CPR scandal, the fingerprint scandal, relaxations of citizenship rules, a proposal for a sneaky tax, L5 taxes on vegetables, and what he described as the worst PISA results ever. Oliver wrote that the government had already grossly failed the Danes. #Folketinget #politik #Danmark (translated)

Klaus Riskær Pedersen criticized the former and current government for the handling of the CPR register. He wrote that systematic data collection could have taken place without being stopped by the security systems and called it a political scandal that required immediate accountability. Pedersen claimed that the problems were due to Minister of Interior and Housing Christian Rabjerg Madsen awarding the operation of the CPR system to the American company DXC Technology in 2022. He also criticized former Minister Kaare Dybvad Bek, stating that the tender in 2021 was carried out under the GPA agreement, which allowed American companies to bid. According to Pedersen, the agreement allowed for the exclusion of foreign bidders on grounds of security and vital national interests, and he believed that the CPR register, which he described as critical infrastructure, should not have been entrusted to a foreign company. He placed the responsibility for the lack of control systems on the Agency for Digitization and believed that the government's leadership bore political accountability for the appointments. He wrote that Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen had not made the decision herself but had appointed a political leadership that he considered lacking in professionalism and experience. He also claimed that the government had been so preoccupied with the war in Europe by the end of 2022 that it had not concerned itself with the CPR system. Furthermore, Pedersen criticized that the Parliament, in his opinion, would choose Henrik Frandsen from the Moderates as chairman, even though Frandsen had only served in Parliament for four years. He described Frandsen as unworthy of the position and accused him of serious moral shortcomings. Pedersen wrote that all Danish citizens must remain vigilant until those responsible figured out whether new CPR numbers were necessary, suggesting that Russia would be to blame. He alleged that businesses' access to the register had been shut down, causing chaos, and that the lack of identity verification could make it difficult for public institutions to hire educators. He compared the situation to previous problems in the police's data systems. #Inkompetence #Politik #Danmark (translated)

Palle Hyldgård Poulsen wrote that Mette Frederiksen had said in the Folketing in June that Danish citizenships would not be granted until a screening model was ready. He asked whether it was a big lie, or if Frederiksen still stood by her words. #dkpol #dkmedier https://t.co/8T3udmrMWC #dkpol #danskpolitik #statsborgerskab (translated)

Eva Gregersen wrote that the government, according to her information, would reintroduce a bill on Danish citizenship for 2,055 applicants and their 1,039 children without first screening them for anti-democratic views. She believed that the Social Democrats were thus yielding to the value-political left. In a column in Berlingske in February, Gregersen had predicted that at least 600 people with the same ideological standpoint as an applicant, whom Stoklund had allegedly rejected the year before due to their values, would obtain citizenship. She also referred to Wilkes' study for Jyllands-Posten from 2024, which according to her showed that 54 percent of Muslims living in Denmark believed that the dictates of the Koran should be followed fully. Gregersen pointed out that Mette Frederiksen had stated from the podium of the Folketing that it was incompatible with Danish society to take the words of the Koran at face value. Gregersen agreed with that assessment and called it national self-harm to continue granting citizenship to so many people, whom she believed could be expected to follow the dictates of the Koran. #udlændingepolitik #danskpolitik #statsborgerskab (translated)

Madness, axe robbery, assault on a police officer who was left disabled. I warned and shared videos about him back in 2021. But he is still in the country, and why is that? Well, a huge naive majority in the Parliament has granted him citizenship. Remember that Alex Vanopslagh, Inger Støjberg, Mona Juul, and many more have NEVER voted against granting citizenship. I wonder if the parties that have ensured that Danes are forced to encounter him again... actually feel any shame and guilt? They should! #Danmark #politiskdebat #retskriminalitet (translated)

Today, the Parliament showed its ugliest side. Before the election, Pelle Dragsted promised that his first political proposal would be to reinstate Great Prayer Day. An hour ago, when we voted on the Danish People's Party's proposal to reinstate Great Prayer Day now and not in 2030, the Unity List voted against it. Before the election, Pia Olsen Dyhr promised the students that she would not cut their student grants. Now she and the Socialist Party are cutting the student grants to finance the government's budget. Before the election, Mette Frederiksen promised that the punishment should fit the crime. Nevertheless, the Social Democrats voted against it when we voted an hour ago on the Danish People's Party's proposal that murderers like Elias Shegow, who stoned a 13-year-old girl, should not receive a reduced sentence. And do you know what the worst part is? That these arrogant politicians probably don't even feel the slightest shame over their blatant lies and voter deception. Just think... They stand on nationwide TV and promise the Danish people one thing. And when the election is over, they go right down to the Parliament and vote the exact opposite, hoping that the Danes won't notice it. They should be ashamed. #politik #valg #fagforening (translated)

HØJESTERET HAR TALT Den 4. september sad jeg i Højesteret og fulgte sagen om en arabisk kvinde, der havde snydt sig til dansk indfødsret i 2015. I 2013 havde hun i ansøgningsskemaet nemlig afgivet en tro- og loveerklæring på, at hun ikke havde begået kriminelle forhold. I 2016 blev hun og ægtefællen imidlertid sigtet for at have udøvet grov vold mod sin på tidspunktet 4 årige datter. I 2017 blev hun og ægtefællen dømt for volden mod datteren. Det betyder, at kvinden, da hun ansøgte om dansk indfødsret, fortiede, at hun havde begået strafbare forhold og dermed afgav en falsk erklæring til myndighederne. Spørgsmålet for Højesteret var, om frakendelse vil være i strid med Danmarks internationale forpligtelser, herunder EMRK artikel 8. Højesteret har i dag stadfæstet, at hun frakendes sin danske indfødsret. Det glæder mig. Dommen er rigtig. Men efter min opfattelse bør loven ændres. Hvis en ansøger ikke opfyldte betingelserne, da Folketinget vedtog loven om indfødsret, bør indfødsretten anses for aldrig at være gyldigt erhvervet. Nullitet fra begyndelsen, ex tunc. Det bør skrives klart ind i indfødsretsloven og kommende love om indfødsrets meddelelse, så forventnings- og indrettelseshensyn ikke kan bruges til at fastholde en indfødsret opnået på et urigtigt grundlag. For man skal ikke kunne opnå ved domstolene, hvad man aldrig ville have fået af Folketinget, hvis sandheden havde været kendt. Det er alene Folketinget, der efter grundlovens § 44, stk. 1, bestemmer, hvem der kan opnå dansk indfødsret. Sprogkravet og indfødsretsprøven bør samtidig skærpes markant. Ved min overværing af sagen i retten undrede jeg mig meget over, hvordan hun kunne opfylde sprogkravet og bestå indfødsretsprøven, når en arabisk tolk måtte oversætte hele retsmødet for hende. Højesteret bemærker da også i dommen, at hun kun forstår og taler dansk i meget begrænset omfang. For hvis hun efter 27 år i Danmark ikke kan begå sig på dansk, hvordan kunne hun så opfylde kravene for 12 år siden. Måske er der givet dispensation. Det mangler jeg fortsat svar på. Og det leder mig hen til, at det bør være sådan, at ansøgernes identitet kontrolleres biometrisk ved deltagelse i prøven, så myndighederne senere kan kontrollere, om den, der tog prøven, er den samme som den, der får udstedt et dansk pas. Men altså, vi bør bare lade være med at massedele vores indfødsret ud som bolsjer. Jeg minder om, at der pt. er over 19.000 ansøgninger om dansk indfødsret. Det er hovedrystende. #Indfødsret #Danmark #Rettigheder

Det er så mådeligt provokerende at se socialdemokraterne kaste sig frådende over @MadsStrange_, når de selv har bagagen fuld af lyve-bæ og fikumdik! Men sossernes hykleriske helligfranseri bør ikke fjerne fokus fra, at det er et kæmpe problem, når magtfulde politikere siger noget vrøvl eller lyver. UANSET OM DET ER EN SOCIALDEMOKRAT ELLER EN LA’ER, DER GØR DET! Jeg magter næsten ikke længere, hvordan det her vidunderlige lille land drives og hvor stærkt faldende tillid vi efterhånden (med rette!) har til regeringen, Folketinget og myndighederne. Så meget sejler. Så meget fikumdik, ser vi. Så mange ikke-svar, mørklægninger, usandheder, fordrejninger, overdrivelser og underdrivelser. Så mange “jeg kommer ikke til at gå ind i…” og så mange kammerater, der beskytter andre kammerater og så mange “ups, det gik lige for stærkt”. Vi har kratéme brug for at genoprette tilliden i det her land!! Vi har brug for redelighed og omhu - både i regeringen, i hele Folketinget og bredt hos myndighederne. Og hvis ikke de selv vil stille de krav til hinanden, så må vi andre altså tage os sammen og kræve det! Det nytter ikke noget at fortsætte den selvdestruktive vej, hvor man nægter at feje for sin egen, fordi man har travlt med at kaste skidt efter de andre. Så fortsætter palaveret jo bare. Ingen socialdemokrat burde have kastet sten fra sit glashus mod Strange i dag. Samtidig…. Min respekt for - og tillid til - @LiberalAlliance og @MadsStrange_ ville have været styrket i dag, hvis de havde holdt den her sag på egen banehalvdel og taget ansvar for at rette op. Så er det sagt😅 #politik #tillid #hykleri

DRAMA I FOLKETINGET: THOMAS SKRIVER FORSVINDER? På et møde i Folketinget går Socialdemokratiets Thomas Skriver til frontalangreb på Dansk Folkeparti. Han kalder mig og Dansk Folkeparti en “SKAMPLET”, fordi vi viser et billede af Beate, der blev dræbt af en udvisningsdømt kriminel. Straks herefter forsvinder Thomas Skriver ud af mødet. Han undgår dermed at blive konfronteret med, at Dansk Folkeparti selvfølgelig har fået tilladelse til at bruge billedet. Beates død er den sørgelige konsekvens af Socialdemokratiets insisteren på, at udvisningsdømte kriminelle skal have ret til at vandre frit rundt i Danmark. Har man tid til at kalde andre en “skamplet” på demokratiet, bør man også blive og høre svaret - og måske sætte sig ind i sagerne, før man slynger om sig med anklager. Beate og andre ofre for udvisningdømtes kriminalitet fortjener bedre end disse arrogante Socialdemokratiske vredesudbrud. #Folketinget #Socialdemokratiet #DanskFolkeparti

Jeg er ENIG med @BennyEngelbrech ! Med 9 løgne er man gået langt over grænsen for begynderfejl. Godt at @MadsStrange_ har stået 100% på mål for sine fejl om vil bestræbe sig på at være endnu skarpere i fremtiden. Men Benny.. når nu vi alligevel er ved ‘flirten med sandheden’ Hvor langt fra “begynderfejl” synes du så Mette Frederiksen er? 🚁 Har Mads sagt, at der var russiske droner over danske lufthavne, og at det var hybridkrig? 👴 Har han sagt, at Arne-pensionen er til de mest nedslidte, selvom loven kun handler om anciennitet? 🦠 Har han stået på et pressemøde og krævet alle mink aflivet, som en kommission siden kaldte groft vildledende og uden lovhjemmel? 🔒 Har han sagt, at den hårde coronanedlukning skete på «myndighedernes anbefaling», mens planen kom fra Statsministeriet? 📅 Har han sagt, at idéen om at sløjfe Store Bededag først opstod i forhandlingerne, mens Finansministeriet allerede havde regnet på det før valget? 📱 Har han slettet sine SMS'er automatisk og ladet en backup-computer i Statsministeriet undgå politiet? 🚨 Har han udskudt en droneredegørelse to timer før et valg blev udskrevet? 💰 Har han lovet, at beløbsgrænsen ikke ville blive sænket – og sænket den alligevel? 💧 Har han lovet op til 200.000 hektar sprøjteforbud for grundvandet fire dage før et valg – og droppet det bagefter? 📜 Har han gået til valg på et regelstop og stemt imod det i Folketinget? 🌍 Har han solgt 70 procents klimamål som leverance, mens Klimarådet sagde, at Danmark kun var halvvejs? 🏘️ Har han lovet Randers, at børnehaver og ældre ikke skulle betale for Nordic Waste – og efterladt kommunen med regningen? 🧾 Har han sendt en fødevarecheck ud til alle, også til dem der ikke manglede den, midt i en valgkamp? 📂 Har han lovet opgør med bureaukratiet, mens administrationen voksede med omkring 18.000 årsværk? 🏥 Har han lovet bedre ældrepleje, mens kontorstillingerne voksede hurtigere end hænderne hos de ældre? 🚱 Har han haft syv år og et rødt flertal til at beskytte drikkevandet – uden at levere det lovede forbud? 📖 Har han indført en koranlov, der straffer ytringer, han selv tidligere kaldte en del af ytringsfriheden? ⚖️ Har han siddet som statsminister, mens en 28-årig fik betinget fængsel for vittigheder på nettet? 🕵️ Har han hjemsendt FE-toppen på et grundlag, en kommission siden underkendte? 📌 Har han båret det politiske ansvar for jagten på Claus Hjort og for Samsam-sagen? 📡 Har han udvidet PET-loven, telelogning, aldersverificering og presset på for chatkontrol? 📦 Har han lagt emballageafgift oven i en tid, hvor priserne i forvejen var stukket af? ⚡ Har han solgt den grønne omstilling uden at sige, hvad den ville koste på elregningen? 🕌 Har han lovet hård udlændingepolitik, loft, sharia-stop og lukning af muslimske friskoler – og ladet handlingen halte efter sloganet? 🎯 Har han ladet sit parti svare så forskelligt i kandidattests, at vælgeren ikke ved, hvad partiet egentlig mener? 📵 Har han kørt politisk reklame på TikTok, der blev underkendt som skjult? Jeg tænker efterhånden Mette Frederiksen nærmer sig et dobbelt rødt kort med permanent karantæne? #Politik #Sandhed #Danmark