The jury marks a sign for international law by honoring the Nobel Peace Prize winner Navanethem Pillay. #Friedensnobelpreis #InternationalesRecht #NavanethemPillay (translated)
Sane Malang wrote that Morocco insisted on the application of articles 82 and 84 of the CAF regulations. According to internal information he reported, the Moroccan defense believed that the referee had been influenced by the president of the referees' commission, which would explain why he did not stop the match. They also mentioned images showing Safari giving instructions to the referee. Sane Malang added that Senegal was invoking the referee's autonomy of decision, in accordance with law 5 of IFAB and article 9 of FIFA's disciplinary code, since the match had reached its conclusion. He also indicated that Senegal was raising procedural flaws in the CAF appeal jury's decision and mentioning suspicions of corruption. #Maroc #Sénégal #CAF (translated)
The jury of the Renaudot prize has decided to keep the novel "C'était ça ou mourir" by Thélyson Orélien in its selection despite accusations of plagiarism and suspicions of using artificial intelligence. #ThélysonOrélien #IntelligenceArtificielle #PrixLittéraires (translated)
The jury of the Renaudot prize has revealed its second list of nine novels in the running for 2026, including Thélyson Orélien, who, although controversial for his alleged use of artificial intelligence in his novel, remains in the competition. #PrixRenaudot #ThélysonOrélien #Littérature (translated)
Actu Foot relayed, citing Marca via RMC Sport, the account of Pascal Ferré, former director of France Football and head of the Ballon d'Or. According to Ferré, an agent representing a player had asked him to advocate for his client's candidacy to the jury members. He had refused. After Ferré had stepped away to take a call, the agent left, leaving an envelope on the table. Ferré indicated that he had handed it over to reception without knowing the contents. He later encountered the agent again, but the agent did not mention the envelope. The identity of the agent and the player, as well as the contents of the envelope, remained unknown. #BallonDor #Football #Scandale (translated)
Nicolas Ullens de Schooten was found guilty of the murder of his mother-in-law Myriam Lechien, with a jury concluding that it was premeditated, which satisfied the civil parties involved in the case. #AffaireUllens #Assassinat #Préméditation (translated)
During his trial for the murder of Myriam Lechien, Nicolas Ullens expressed his regrets and addressed the Belgian public, stating that his fate was now in the hands of the jury, before the deliberation began. #ProcèsUllens #JusticeBelgique #BrabantWallon (translated)
Stingbase wrote that Alex Schulman's film *Arkipelag* had been chosen as Sweden's Oscar entry before the jury had seen it and stated that the lead roles were played by Wahlgren, Fares, and Skarsgård. The author rhetorically asked if this was exciting and unusual and claimed that something fundamental was wrong with what they called the establishment. #Oscar2024 #SvenskFilm #Filmtips (translated)
The jury for the Daphne Caruana Galizia journalism prize 2026 has selected ten reports as finalists, representing a diversity of important journalistic contributions from across Europe, and the winner will be announced at a ceremony on October 21, 2026, in the European Parliament. #DaphneCaruanaGalizia #Pressfrihet #GrävandeJournalistik (translated)
The author wrote that Suraj Mailitafi, spokesperson of Widersetzen, has been nominated for the taxpayer-funded German Engagement Prize 2026. In the event of a win, Mailitafi intends to donate a portion of the prize money to a Palestinian organization. The author reacted to this with disbelief. #Engagementpreis #Spenden #Palästina #PS #DE #PS (translated)
"Hatred of Jews is also a topic in the stadiums - 'Jew' is an insult, and Jewish players and clubs are being excluded. The DFB is fighting against this, for example with the Julius Hirsch Prize. I myself was on the jury for many years and know how many great projects against hatred the clubs and fan clubs are putting in place. These people support our democracy. This is exactly what is needed today more than ever." Knobloch: "Hatred of Jews is also a topic in stadiums" #Antisemitismus #DFB #Judenhass (translated)
Apollo News reported that opposition spokesman Suraj Mailitafi has been nominated for the taxpayer-funded German Engagement Award 2026. In the event of a win, Mailitafi plans to donate the prize money, among other things, to a Palestinian organization. The jury also includes climate activist Luisa Neubauer. https://t.co/1YZXCgGx6e #Engagementpreis #Spenden #Klimaaktivismus (translated)
An American judge has rejected the acquittal request from Lindsay Clancy, accused of killing her three children, thus bringing this mother closer to a possible new trial after a jury that failed to reach a decision. #LindsayClancy #Justice #SantéMentale (translated)
"My responsibility is to enforce the sentences pronounced by the juries of Tennessee, even when it is difficult, and that is exactly what we intend to do," said Bill Lee on Thursday. #PeineCapitale #ChristaPike #ExécutionInfructueuse (translated)
Downfall tableaux. Reputation resuscitation. Immediately. Merz is presenting the International Peace Prize of Westphalia to Rutte today, a day after Mark's fiddling with his papers because he was lying about the threat from Russia. But NATO brings "stability and reliability," according to the jury. 🤡 #politiek #vrede #NAVO (translated)
A few days ago, the collection of proposals for the Youth Word of the Year 2026 started. Theoretically, the jury chooses them from all the proposals. After publishing this map in August, I received hundreds of comments like "now everyone says that" from young people outside my bubble of followers. https://t.co/wrxVRRqfbk #MłodzieżoweSłowoRoku #słowo #język (translated)
A psychiatrist mentions temporary dementia in Nicolas Ullens, accused of killing his mother-in-law, which could lead to his acquittal if the jury accepts this defense. #Justice #DémenceTemporaire #AffaireUllens (translated)
Mr. Grzegorz, I read the entire justification. And I agree with one thing – legal analysis cannot be replaced with the label of a "neo-judge," because that is not an argument 🤷♂️ However, the justification itself, although extensive and internally organized, in my opinion leaves two very serious legal problems. The first concerns Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision states that in preparatory proceedings, a "blanket warrant" can be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of their objection. Here, the prosecutor filed an objection. The court does not challenge the wording of the provision. It consciously deviates from it, considering that the binding objection of the prosecutor would violate the court's jurisdictional independence. It references Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 178 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 47 of the KPP, and part of the case law of appellate courts. This is a legal argument. But there is also an opposing line of case law, based precisely on the linguistic interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the court itself notes in the justification. I wrote about this yesterday. So it is not the case that there is no problem. There is a very serious dispute about the limits of interpretation contra legem and whether the court can practically deprive the premise, which the legislator explicitly included in the provision. The second problem I have is with the prognostic assessment. The court acknowledges that Romanowski left Poland, did not appear for the hearing concerning the temporary arrest, was outside the reach of Polish authorities, and even informed in his own application that he has a passport issued under a different identity 🤷♂️ The court considers these circumstances to be burdensome but then assumes that they cannot determine the assessment because one should look at it primarily prospectively. 🤔 And this is where I have the greatest doubt. The prediction of a suspect's future behavior does not occur in a vacuum. Its foundational material is, after all, their past behavior. 🤷♂️ If a person involved in the proceedings previously did not comply with procedural mechanisms, left the country, and remained outside the reach of the authorities, then their later declaration that from this moment they will comply with the conditions of the "blanket warrant" must be subjected to particularly rigorous assessment. The court may conclude that despite this, the risk has currently diminished. But it should convincingly demonstrate why specific past behaviors have lost their prognostic significance. Because if we are to predict a person’s future behavior while disregarding their past behavior, then a rather fundamental question arises - on what basis are we actually building this prediction? 🤷♂️ Therefore, I would not dismiss this ruling with the label of a neo-judge, but I would also not say that the problem ends with the justification sounding rational. A rationally constructed justification can still lead to a legally debatable result. In my opinion, this is exactly the kind of case we are dealing with here. The argumentation of the court is clear and can be recounted, but both the way of breaking the literal wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the prognostic assessment of the suspect's behavior leave significant legal doubts. If I were to rule on this matter, I would not grant the application. Firstly – due to the prosecutor's objection and the content of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Secondly – even accepting a different interpretation of this provision, I would not find sufficient grounds for a positive prognostic assessment. This is not about punishing Romanowski for the past. It is about assessing whether his past behavior allows rationally to assume that from this moment he will respect the obligations arising from the "blanket warrant." In my opinion – it does not allow 🤷♂️ And that is precisely why there is an appellate review. #prawo #justycja #analizaprawna (translated)
Yo. Allow me to introduce: The "jury" of a €100,000 prize! We live in a system-power bubble. 🥲 https://t.co/BFDaPQtHna #Preisverleihung #Jury #Systemkritik (translated)
Today the "Westphalian Peace Prize" will be awarded to the (🥁) @NATO. Reason: The #NATO would "perform continuous peace work." Now guess who is on the jury 🫣: 1. @bundeskanzler #Merz, 2. @sigmargabriel (Chairman @atlantikbruecke), 3. Federal President Steinmeier, 4. @cem_oezdemir, 5. Alexander Graf Lambsdorff (Ambassador in Israel), 6. NRW-MP Hendrik Wüst, 7. Georg Friedrich Prince of Prussia et al. PS: The "International Prize of the Westphalian Peace" probably deserves an award itself: For the most biased jury ever... #Frieden #NATO #Politik (translated)
