Search

Yaron Nadbornik criticized Heikki Hiilamo's column published in Yleisradio, stating that it presented a one-sided image connecting the actions of Israel's leadership, Finnish Christian groups, and Minister Antti Häkkänen's visit to the structures of oppression. Nadbornik argued that the column's treatment of Israel and Zionism made Jews collectively responsible and expanded the criticism to also include Israel's supporters and Jews in general. According to Nadbornik, Hiilamo's text divided the parties into white and Christian oppressors and non-white and Muslim victims. He said this framing overlooked the Jewish roots, history, and vulnerability in the Middle East, as well as the fact that millions of people from various backgrounds lived in Israel. He also believed that the framework wrongly fit the conflict into a narrative of Western colonialism and racism and presented Israel as a refuge for a people without another homeland. Nadbornik wrote that the prejudices against Jews were based on their otherness. He noted that studies had shown that Jews living in the diaspora were unjustly held accountable for the actions of the state of Israel. He argued that Hiilamo's rhetoric, which connected Christian groups and ministerial visits with the suffering in Gaza, reinforced this framework. Nadbornik recalled the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, describing it as a massacre involving rapes, mutilations, and the abduction of civilians, including babies, festival-goers, and the elderly, into Israel. He called it the largest single act of violence against Jews since the Holocaust. According to Nadbornik, Hiilamo overlooked the fact that Hamas and Hezbollah openly sought the destruction of Israel in connection with Israel's military actions. He believed that framing the terror attack merely as a security threat or comparing it to Russia's invasion of Ukraine ignored the rights of Israeli citizens to exist and be protected. https://t.co/PFvBFdaoiQ #Israel #Juutalaiset #Rasismi (translated)

The author stated that Muslims would incite against him because as a former Muslim, secular humanist, and gay man, he clearly supports Israel. He referred to Israel as the only real democracy in the Middle East and as a rule of law with a separation of powers in the judiciary and free elections. #Israel #Menschenrechte #Toleranz #IL #DE (translated)

Tuulia Alanko wrote that the imam's statement about Finnish law applying to Muslims did not, in her opinion, answer the question of the status of sharia law nor did it exclude the possibility of considering it important. She described the response as misleading. Alanko claimed that Aw-Musse had not distanced himself from sharia law or the idea of separate sharia courts in Finland. She suggested that this was related to both the imam's role and the fact that messages pleasing to Finns might be beneficial in the long term. According to Alanko, Aw-Musse could have directly stated that he did not want to replace Finnish laws with an Islamic legal system. Alanko finally referred to Jari Sarasvuo's statement that sharia or a parallel culture was not needed in Finland. #Suomi #Islam #Šaria (translated)

The Listener podcast announced in episode #107 that it had interviewed Hannele Al-hamzawi, who, according to the podcast, had lived as a member of the Muslim community for 16 years and was now sharing her experiences in the Finnish Muslim community for the first time. The episode also discussed how Al-hamzawi prevented an honor killing, the visibility of Islam in the daily lives of Muslims, parallel societies in Finland, as well as Muslims' perceptions of Finnish men and women. The podcast stated that the episode was scheduled to be released on Sunday at 12 PM on Spotify and other platforms. It also claimed that the imams did not want people to listen to the episode. #kuuntelija #podcast #muslimiyhteisö (translated)

Snicklink claimed that the emerging civil war-like situation in Europe, characterized by oppositions between right and left, Christians and Muslims, as well as supporters and opponents of migration, was not the unintended consequence of various events and developments. He wrote that it was rather their actual and sole purpose. #Europa #Gesellschaft #Spaltung (translated)

The author expressed that they were shocked by the discussion surrounding Imam Sharmarke Said Aw-Mussen. They wrote that Muslims were constantly required to assimilate, respect Finnish values, and participate in social discourse, noting that the imam was now trying to do just that. #kotoutuminen #yhteiskunta #keskustelu #FI (translated)

According to the author, there was an uproar over Prime Minister Petteri Orpo's meeting with the imam, even though meetings with leaders of religious communities were part of the Prime Minister's duties. The author stated that the imam said that Finnish law applied to everyone, including Muslims, but according to him, he was still pressed on sharia as if it were a crime. The author found this repugnant and racist. #uskonto #rasismi #Suomi #FI (translated)

Susanne Schröter reported that after a discussion between Alice Schwarzer and Constantin Schreiber about his new book at the Frankfurt Book Fair, she was with Schwarzer. Schröter wrote that the significance of Islam will increase worldwide as well as in Europe and Germany. Therefore, it must be urgently recognized what this means. Fundamentalism and extremism are on the rise, also because they are downplayed, while liberal and secular Muslims continue not to be perceived as a democratic resource. In her opinion, this must change quickly. #Europa (translated)

Nasir Ahmad wrote that the German perpetrator was a police officer and asked what M. Ostermann would say about it. He claimed that Ostermann's outrage only applied to foreigners or Muslims and that he ignored German perpetrators. Ahmad summarized the accusation with the words "No foreigner = no outcry." https://t.co/4pqIoK5oZH #Deutschland #Polizei #Gesellschaft (translated)

Linnéa wrote that her first clear image of Islam had been shaped by the September 11 attacks, as she was born in the 1990s, and claimed that Muslim actions since then had not been positive. She objected to Richard Jomshof from the Swedish Democrats shaping Westerners' first image of Islam and asked why, in her view, Muslims seemed to lack humility and what they expected her to think. #Ödmjukhet (translated)

Lars Andersen wrote that he wanted more TV where Muslims were asked about their views on freedom, gender, and society. He believed it would pave the way for remigration by showing the Danes what a large minority in Denmark believed. https://t.co/S1QPKPzazu #Danmark #Frihed #Samfund (translated)

David Tarp described what he referred to as a significant strawman argumentation. He wrote that nearly 80% of Muslim men did not accept homosexuality and that there were about 300,000 Muslims in Denmark. He asked how many members the Pentecostal Movement and Inner Mission had. #Danmark #Muslimer #Homoseksualitet (translated)

HWL wondered why more Muslims described as integrated did not speak out about the spread of Islamism in Europe. HWL claimed that they had fled from that very oppression, but questioned whether that was really true and wrote that the situation was difficult to understand. #Islamism #Integration #Muslimer (translated)

The writer wondered why the right was upset that the imams in Järva had urged everyone to vote. The post stated that Frida Sundkvist had gone to Rinkeby to clarify the debate about election fraud and asked if anyone had actually cheated, or if the right did not want the poor, immigrants, and Muslims to vote. https://t.co/pULJjI77OQ #valfusk #röstning #Järva #SE (translated)

Eva Gregersen wrote that the government, according to her information, would reintroduce a bill on Danish citizenship for 2,055 applicants and their 1,039 children without first screening them for anti-democratic views. She believed that the Social Democrats were thus yielding to the value-political left. In a column in Berlingske in February, Gregersen had predicted that at least 600 people with the same ideological standpoint as an applicant, whom Stoklund had allegedly rejected the year before due to their values, would obtain citizenship. She also referred to Wilkes' study for Jyllands-Posten from 2024, which according to her showed that 54 percent of Muslims living in Denmark believed that the dictates of the Koran should be followed fully. Gregersen pointed out that Mette Frederiksen had stated from the podium of the Folketing that it was incompatible with Danish society to take the words of the Koran at face value. Gregersen agreed with that assessment and called it national self-harm to continue granting citizenship to so many people, whom she believed could be expected to follow the dictates of the Koran. #udlændingepolitik #danskpolitik #statsborgerskab (translated)

Linnéa wrote that Emma could not know this, as no such survey had been conducted among Swedish Muslims. She referred to the fact that 38 percent in France, according to her, believed that sharia was more important than French law and claimed that a similar level in Sweden would mean that a significant proportion were Islamists. She added that the issue was uncomfortable to raise. #Sverige #Muslimer #Sharia (translated)

Claus Mathiesen wrote that some commentators during Tucker's interview had argued that it would have been better if Germany had won, as there would then be fewer Muslims in the UK. He believed that the education system and democratic upbringing had failed, and that the situation could only get worse. #samfund #uddannelse #diskurs (translated)