Search

Max Hübner used an offensive term towards Donald Tusk and wrote that the prime minister was speaking unclearly. He also accused him of a lack of logic in his statements about security in schools: first, as he reported, Tusk spoke about preventing disturbing phenomena, and 10 seconds later about an immediate response. Hübner stated that such a contradiction occurred in the government. https://t.co/RsjsTCvFQ6 #Polityka #Bezpieczeństwo #Logika (translated)

NeoJudgeTuleya wrote that in recent hours, information about a possible attack on the prime minister and deputy prime minister was conveyed through special services, and urgent meetings were held at the Anti-Terrorist Center. The author suggested that the threat had been communicated via email and its publicity was an operation intended to divert attention from government problems. As a background, he pointed to the collapse of public finances and record state debt, knife attacks in schools, and scandals at the ministerial level, including the affair of Deputy Minister Kołodziejczak. He wrote that the authorities intentionally directed media attention to the topic of the attack in order to limit the debate on taxes, the budget deficit, and government actions. The author accused the ruling camp of fueling polarization, shifting the blame for mistakes onto political opponents, and appointing individuals who are loyal but, as he assessed, lacking competence. He also claimed that the alert about the attack was intended to provide the government with political benefits, justify state operating costs, and silence the opposition. He mentioned the creation of enemies, including the opposition and President Nawrocki. #polityka #manipulacja #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the entry assessed that Donald Trump believed he was entitled to eight Nobel Peace Prizes, and that their non-awarding was seen by him almost as an insult to the United States. He criticized Karol Nawrocki and his political entourage for, as he wrote, their almost unbounded admiration for Trump. He questioned how one could base Poland's security on his declarations and trust them uncritically, since — in the author's opinion — Trump placed his own ego above the seriousness of the office. He added that foreign policy should not be based on the cult of an individual, and that the security of the state cannot depend on the whims and wounded ambitions of one person. He also stated that he was concerned about the uncritical fascination with Trump among Polish politicians. #Polityka #Trump #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Lawyers for Poland criticized Marcin Kierwiński's statement, noting that the police identified and arrested the author of the recording concerning the knife attacker from Przasnysz, despite President Karol Nawrocki vetoing the law which — as indicated by Kierwiński's statement — was supposed to be the basis for such actions. The organization called this argumentation convoluted. The authors also wrote that Donald Tusk, Barbara Nowacka, Waldemar Żurek, and Kierwiński had known about the ABW report on the radicalization of youth and the increase in violent behavior six months earlier. In their opinion, the safety of Poles was secondary to issues such as "neo-judges," planetary diet, pursuing Marcin Romanowski and Zbigniew Ziobro, as well as actions aimed at Nawrocki. #Polska #bezpieczeństwo #przemoc (translated)

The author referred to Zbigniew Bogucki's statements about the seriousness of politics, contrasting them with the behavior of Karol Nawrocki. He wrote that Bogucki considered the Prime Minister's walking on the pavement next to Belweder to be grotesque, while he deemed Nawrocki's entrance into the ring and boxing demonstration during an official foreign visit to be serious politics. He emphasized that Nawrocki represented the Republic of Poland, not the fan community or the boxing section. He accused Bogucki of applying double standards and inconsistent logic. #Polska #Polityka #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Karol Michalak referred to Tomasz Włodarczyk's comments on the Meczyki program, stating that on Sunday, there may be a lack of fans in the stands, and only later will it be revealed what penalty will be imposed on Legia. Michalak considered such a scenario realistic but questioned its logic. He wrote that if Legia is breaking the rules, and the PZPN knows about it, the reaction should occur before the match; if the club is not breaking the rules, there should be no penalty for the absence of fans. He compared this situation to the police passively observing a theft to the detriment of an elderly woman, and only taking action after a month. #LegiaWarszawa #kibice #PZPN (translated)

"The logic of the 'war party' begins where war is considered an alternative future for Ukraine. I disagree with this. The ability to defend should serve to preserve the country and its inhabitants. The desire for peace does not require justification." The mayor of Kharkiv, Ihor Terekhov, also supported the end of the war through negotiations. #Ukraina #pokój #wojna (translated)

The author accused Marcin Przydacz of inconsistency in his statements about who decided on Donald Tusk's assumption of the office of Prime Minister. He wrote that after Mateusz Morawiecki's government failed to secure a vote of confidence, the Sejm elected Tusk in a constitutional parliamentary procedure, and Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz and Szymon Hołownia had no power to transfer to him. The author stated that by Przydacz's logic, one could argue that Hołownia also decided on the assumption of office by Karol Nawrocki because he convened the National Assembly and enabled the swearing-in. However, he pointed out that in Nawrocki's case, he saw a constitutional problem related to the validity of the elections, the handling of protests, the determination of the validity of the election, and the swearing-in despite objections. He assessed that Hołownia's decision had constitutional significance in this matter. The author also rejected the accusation that Kosiniak-Kamysz prioritized party interests over state interests, claiming that Przydacz equated the interests of the state with preventing Tusk from coming to power. #Polityka #Konstytucja #Debata (translated)

Wojciech Jakóbik wrote that Carlson's interlocutor, by asking him — as he assessed — pertinent questions, caused Carlson to lose his voice in the discussion about Ukraine. Jakóbik called him a Russian propagandist and used an offensive term against him. https://t.co/cWW5bim1K9 #Ukraina #propaganda #dyskusja (translated)

The author of the post compared the government's argument to a situation in which a burglar accuses the homeowner of taking his money by installing a lock. He wrote that the government claimed that lowering excise duty and VAT on fuels caused a budget loss that needed to be compensated. #polityka #gospodarka #prawo #PL (translated)

Sir Ciecióra, The President did not veto either the EU SAFE instrument or the EU Council's decision to provide financing to Poland, so please do not manipulate. He vetoed the Polish act on the Financial Instrument for Increasing Security SAFE – that is, the act that creates a national mechanism for managing these funds at BGK and the rules for their use, control, and audit. This is really not the same as your: "Tusk bypassed the veto and took out a loan" 🤷‍♂️ If you want to raise a constitutional or financial allegation, you should first precisely clarify which act was vetoed and what legal consequences this veto caused. And to do that, you first need to read the law that the President actually vetoed with understanding and check what mechanisms it introduced. Only then can one build a political narrative on it. And now the second part of your entry. You are comparing two completely different legal procedures and from this difference, you are making hypocrisy; I am shocked by your logic in this regard. SAFE is a EU law instrument. Financial assistance for Poland was made available by a decision of the EU Council based on the SAFE regulation, and the financing conditions are then specified in a loan agreement with the Commission. On the other hand, lowering Polish taxes requires a change in Polish law. And the law – according to the Constitution – after being passed by parliament goes to the President 🤷‍♂️ It is not - sometimes you can bypass the President, and other times you need to ask for his consent. These are simply two different legal regimes and two different modes of state action. Turning the constitutional difference of competences into proof of the greatest hypocrisy in history looks impressive for the audience, but legally, not much comes of it 🤷‍♂️ #Polska #UE #Prawo (translated)

Mr. Wójcik, I think you are adding too much to a single court ruling. Firstly – we do not yet know the full written justification. From public reports, it appears that the court at this stage did not notice any fear of tampering and deemed the issuance of a travel ban appropriate. That is not the same as erasing the entire procedural history of Mr. Romanowski. Secondly – you are contrasting the explanation of the case with the position of the prosecutor's office. However, the prosecutor's office is currently conducting proceedings to clarify this matter. The dispute is not about whether to clarify it, but under what conditions the suspect should participate in the proceedings 🤔 And finally – can we really say today without any qualification that there is no fear of hiding, aside from the wanted list, the EAW, the many months spent outside Poland, and the current course of the proceedings? In my opinion, no, of course, the court may conclude that the grounds currently look different. That is the court's role. But that does not yet support your narrative that the court wants to clarify the matter, while the prosecution merely wants to chase. The prosecution is pursuing the suspect precisely so that the proceedings can be conducted and the matter clarified 🤷‍♂️ Do you really not see a problem with the logic here? #prawo #sprawiedliwość #sąd (translated)

One of the most primitive goons @tvn24, a walking show-off mixed with complexes, a mediocrity @rafal_wojda, invited a lawyer expert with the intention of smashing the "neosedzi pisowski," and the expert mercilessly smashed @w_zurek and @PK_GOV_PL, pointing out their actions contrary to the legal interest of the public prosecutor and procedural logic. The expert directly said that the court's decision is exceptionally reasonable and justified, and the iron list in no way prevents the issuing of a verdict, and a harsh one at that. In short, Egon @w_zurek is putting on a circus for #silnirazem and is afraid of the trial, which is why he wants to chase the rabbit and file a complaint to avoid the trial. #polityka #prawo #TVN24 (translated)

111 000 PODPISÓW 15 000 roboczogodzin wolontariatu 20+ punktów zbiórki w 18 dzielnicach Warszawy Bez gotowych struktur. Bez zawodowych działaczy. Bez potężnego finansowania. Bez realnego wsparcia partii politycznych i mediów Każdej organizacji społecznej życzę takiego „fiaska” W ciągu zaledwie 60 dni stworzyliśmy z niczego sprawną organizację miejską, która zdołała zebrać 111 000 podpisów Warszawiaków i Warszawianek. Wznieciliśmy skalę społecznej mobilizacji, której Stolica nie widziała od lat. Nasza akcja była przede wszystkim wyrazem sprzeciwu wobec sposobu zarządzania Warszawą: partyjniactwa, kumoterstwa, niegospodarności oraz traktowania urzędu prezydenta miasta jako trampoliny do najwyższych urzędów w państwie. I widzimy, że już teraz nasza akcja przyniosła w tym zakresie pozytywny efekt. W Prezydenta @trzaskowski_ w ostatnich tygodniach wstąpił zadziwiający, niespotykany przez ostatnie 8 lat zapał do zajmowania się problemami miasta i jego mieszkańców. Należy mieć nadzieję, że wraz z końcem zbiórki ta energia nie wyparuje nagle i nie powróci znany tryb „bywania w Ratuszu raz-dwa razy w tygodniu” Przez ostatnie dwa miesiące byliśmy w całej Warszawie. Także tam, gdzie wielu uważało, że naszego wniosku nikt nie będzie chciał podpisywać -chociażby w Miasteczku Wilanów. A jednak ludzie podpisywali. Wielokrotnie słyszeliśmy przy tym: „Głosowałem na Trzaskowskiego, ale mam już dosyć”. I to jest właśnie jeden z najważniejszych rezultatów naszej akcji. Warszawiacy zobaczyli, że można i należy otwarcie dyskutować o sposobie zarządzania miastem, krytykować jego władze i oczekiwać od nich znacznie więcej. Czasy biernej akceptacji dla standardów rodem z oddziału ratunkowego w Szpitalu Południowym bezpowrotnie minęły. Jestem niezwykle dumny z tego, co zbudowaliśmy. Szczególnie dumny jestem z naszych wolontariuszy, którzy poświęcili swój czas pro publico bono - często angażując się społecznie po raz pierwszy. Jestem pewien, że tego potencjału nie zmarnujemy. 🟨Stołeczna Operacja Referendalna się skończyła. 🟥Stołeczna Organizacja Rozwoju właśnie się zaczyna. Będziemy patrzeć władzom Warszawy na ręce. Będziemy wskazywać problemy. Będziemy proponować rozwiązania. Będziemy zabiegać o interes WSZYSTKICH mieszkańców Warszawy. Tymczasem warszawska opozycja, na czele z Prawem i Sprawiedliwością, pokazała bierność, apatię i - najwyraźniej - zadowolenie z obecnego stanu rzeczy. Kierując się kunktatorską logiką, zdecydowali się zignorować oddolny, obywatelski ruch sprzeciwu. Trudno. Ich czas i tak się skończył. My dopiero się rozkręcamy. Dziękuję wszystkim STU JEDENASTU TYSIĄCOM mieszkańców Warszawy, którzy poparli naszą inicjatywę. Działamy dalej. Dla Was ✌️🇵🇱 #Warszawa #Społeczność #AkcjaObywatelska

Tak na spokojnie, bo to pismo zawiera kilka ciekawych kwiatków. 1. "Nie ma możliwości zapewnienia korzystania z sektora gości w sposób odpowiadający wymaganym standardom". Prosta logika: albo problem jest nowy, albo standardy wcześniej nie były spełnione. Która wersja? Jeśli nowy, jest jakiś protokół zniszczeń po meczu Legii z Widzewem? Jeśli zaś stary, to czy Legia przyjmowała gości na niesprawnym sektorze i się do tego przyznaje? Jedno z powyższych musi być prawdziwe. 2. Kwestia działki - problem nowy, czy Legia nielegalnie korzystała z gruntu nienależącego do niej? Tak czy siak, ZZW daje możliwość podpisania umowy dzierżawy do 7.10. Przed meczem z Wisłą. W czym problem? 3. Zakres prac: monitoring, wymiana siatki i ekstra brama. Nic, czego nie da się naprawić w kilka tygodni. Tym bardziej absurdalne wygląda ten termin "do końca 2026 roku", bo oczywiste, że uda się naprawić dużo szybciej. Generalnie baaardzo zawoalowane kłamstwa i gierki mają to do siebie, że łatwo się w nich pogubić. Śląsk przynajmniej wprost przyznał, w czym jest rzecz. Ciekawe, czy Legia na wszystko ma papier. Tak czy siak wielki wysiłek, aby przypodobać się kibolom. Oczywiście znam realia i wiem, że w tym kraju i z tym związkiem Legii nic nie grozi. A powinno grozić co najmniej bardzo szczegółowe dochodzenie. #Legia #kibice #sport

Ta sama logika działa w drugą stronę w przypadku metali ziem rzadkich — Pekin nie ma zbytniej motywacji, by rezygnować z przewagi, która jego zdaniem może okazać się przydatna w przyszłym sporzeTe pominięcia są wymowne — chipy, sprzęt półprzewodnikowy i kontrole eksportowe w ogóle nie pojawiają się w zestawieniu faktów, ponieważ kwestie te w coraz większym stopniu wpisują się w rywalizację w zakresie bezpieczeństwa narodowego, a nie w zwykłe negocjacje handlowe— mówi Craig Singleton, były urzędnik ds. bezpieczeństwa narodowego posiadający dogłębną wiedzę na temat stosunków amerykańsko-chińskich. #XiJinping #handel #StanyZjednoczone

U izjavi nakon dolaska koju je prenijela kineska novinska agencija Xinhua, Xi je izrazio nadu u stabilnije odnose sa SAD-om, poručivši da bi Peking i Washington trebali biti "partneri, a ne suparnici" te da se "povijesna logika mirnog suživota" dviju zemalja nije promijenila. #Kina #SAD #Trump

"Kina i Sjedinjene Američke Države dvije su velike nacije s velikim narodima. Ovdje sam kako bismo nastavili njegovati naše prijateljstvo, proširili suradnju i unaprijedili dobrobit obaju naših naroda. Interesi Kine i SAD-a duboko su isprepleteni i bez naše međusobne suradnje bilo bi iznimno teško riješiti mnoge od gorućih svjetskih problema. Naše dvije zemlje nose povijesnu odgovornost za promicanje ljudskog napretka i spreman sam surađivati s predsjednikom Trumpom kako bismo zajednički upravljali kormilom kinesko-američkih odnosa. Moramo jačati komunikaciju; iskren, dubok i kontinuiran dijalog najbolji je put prema jačanju razumijevanja i međusobnog povjerenja. Između mene i predsjednika Trumpa postoji duboko osobno poštovanje i razvili smo kvalitetan odnos. Moramo osigurati mirnu koegzistenciju, a natjecanje između naših gospodarstava mora ostati pozitivno i u jasnim okvirima. Naše vojske trebaju održavati redoviti dijalog i ne smijemo prijeći granicu sukoba, Kina i SAD imaju sve za dobiti iz suradnje, dok bi u slučaju sukoba obje strane pretrpjele poraz. Kao vodeće sile u području umjetne inteligencije, snosimo odgovornost usmjeriti njezin razvoj prema općem dobru te osigurati da AI tehnologija uijek ostane pod ljudskom kontrolom i u službi dobrobiti društva. Također, Kina drži svoja vrata širom otvorena i izražava dobrodošlicu američkim tvrtkama koje žele poslovati i investirati na našem tržištu, a jednako se tako nadamo da će kineske tvrtke ovdje u SAD-u imati pravedan i ravnopravan tretman. Kako bismo dodatno učvrstili veze naših naroda, ovim putem upućujem službeni poziv za 100.000 američkih studenata da u narednih pet godina posjete Kinu radi razmjene i studija. Jednako tako, s ponosom objavljujem da će u sklopu nastavka naše tradicije partnerstva dvije pande, Ping Ping i Fu Shuang, u nadolazećim danima useliti u svoj novi dom u zoološkom vrtu u Atlanti"U izjavi nakon dolaska koju je prenijela kineska novinska agencija Xinhua, Xi je izrazio nadu u stabilnije odnose sa SAD-om, poručivši da bi Peking i Washington trebali biti "partneri, a ne suparnici" te da se "povijesna logika mirnog suživota" dviju zemalja nije promijenila. #Trump #XiJinping #SADKina

U izjavi nakon dolaska koju je prenijela kineska novinska agencija Xinhua, Xi je izrazio nadu u stabilnije odnose sa SAD-om, poručivši da bi Peking i Washington trebali biti "partneri, a ne suparnici" te da se "povijesna logika mirnog suživota" dviju zemalja nije promijenila. #Trump #XiJinping #SADKina