Search

Yaron Nadbornik criticized Heikki Hiilamo's column published in Yleisradio, stating that it presented a one-sided image connecting the actions of Israel's leadership, Finnish Christian groups, and Minister Antti Häkkänen's visit to the structures of oppression. Nadbornik argued that the column's treatment of Israel and Zionism made Jews collectively responsible and expanded the criticism to also include Israel's supporters and Jews in general. According to Nadbornik, Hiilamo's text divided the parties into white and Christian oppressors and non-white and Muslim victims. He said this framing overlooked the Jewish roots, history, and vulnerability in the Middle East, as well as the fact that millions of people from various backgrounds lived in Israel. He also believed that the framework wrongly fit the conflict into a narrative of Western colonialism and racism and presented Israel as a refuge for a people without another homeland. Nadbornik wrote that the prejudices against Jews were based on their otherness. He noted that studies had shown that Jews living in the diaspora were unjustly held accountable for the actions of the state of Israel. He argued that Hiilamo's rhetoric, which connected Christian groups and ministerial visits with the suffering in Gaza, reinforced this framework. Nadbornik recalled the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, describing it as a massacre involving rapes, mutilations, and the abduction of civilians, including babies, festival-goers, and the elderly, into Israel. He called it the largest single act of violence against Jews since the Holocaust. According to Nadbornik, Hiilamo overlooked the fact that Hamas and Hezbollah openly sought the destruction of Israel in connection with Israel's military actions. He believed that framing the terror attack merely as a security threat or comparing it to Russia's invasion of Ukraine ignored the rights of Israeli citizens to exist and be protected. https://t.co/PFvBFdaoiQ #Israel #Juutalaiset #Rasismi (translated)

Anne Nevgi wrote that she had read Hiilamo's column and found it full of ideological and anti-Israel interpretations. According to her, the bias of the column was evident in that the facts presented were interpreted in an anti-Israel way and events were framed through colonialism, racism, and whiteness. Nevgi argued that Hamas's brutality was not addressed and the origins of the Gaza conflict were not considered. She stated that the column created a misleading picture and inaccurately equated two different wars. #IsraelinKonflikti #Ideologiat #Propaganda (translated)

The author pondered what energy security meant in a situation where dependence on Russia decreased but electricity consumption increased. He wrote that a recent report by EU inspectors showed that there was still much to be done to ensure energy security and referred to his column addressing the topic. https://t.co/6rEHE50Rp1 #energiaturvallisuus #energia #EU #FI #RU (translated)

The Christian persecutors during the Inquisition were convinced that they honored Jesus; today's greens are convinced that they promote the cause of anti-racism, while they persecute, slander, and shame a small minority. This includes the author and columnist Jonathan Freedland, who calls Polanski's arguments empty and illogical. #GreenParty #Sionism #Antisemitism (translated)

Viktor Barth-Kron criticized a DN columnist who, according to him, lamented the existence of political conflicts in the Swedish parliament. He questioned the description of the time after the speaker election as a "bloodthirsty spiral of revenge" and wrote that the Social Democrats had been grumpy for a couple of days and that Ida Gabrielsson had talked about coffee. https://t.co/amlhFicfSw #politik #Sverige #DNkolumnist (translated)

Iman Sefati accused columnists and Islamists of attempting to prevent the Freedom Prize of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom for the Iranian people, while simultaneously remaining silent on executions and human rights abuses in Iran. He asked where their tweets on these topics had been in recent days. The prize is awarded to the Iranian people – including conservatives, leftists, liberals, Baluchis, Azeris, Kurds, and other groups. Prince Reza Pahlavi accepts it on their behalf, Sefati wrote. It is not about a single person, but about a people fighting for freedom. In conclusion, he said that those criticized should be ashamed. #Iran #Menschenrechte #Freiheit (translated)

Keijo Kaarisade wrote that Sixseven Korkboy did not make it to the finals of the high school economic guru competition. According to Kaarisade, Korkboy had stated that adjustments were necessary, but had focused on listing things that should not be cut. He mentioned that Helsingin Sanomat had offered Korkboy a consolation prize of columnist work and called him a moral winner. #talous #kilpailu #voitto (translated)

Heikki Pursiainen criticized Finnish economic discussion as limited based on two recently published columns in Helsingin Sanomat. According to him, Korkman described what should not be cut and believed that adjustments were necessary but did not propose any cuts. Pursiainen claimed that Korkman also criticized the government’s policies without offering alternatives. Pursiainen wrote that he found Teittinen’s reflections good in themselves but believed they underestimated Finns' ability to impact matters. He argued that Teittinen suggested that adjustments would probably be politically impossible and that Finland's fate depended on economic conditions and Russia. Pursiainen assessed that there could be many actions: he mentioned more encouraging social security, cutting business subsidies, tuition fees, and abandoning incentives for staying home as a parent. He added that for conservatives, a smaller public sector was a goal and not a reason for lamenting, and in his view, adjustments did not threaten the foundations of the welfare state. Pursiainen indicated that economists should also present their own solutions for discussion and negotiation. #Suomi #Taloustiede #Politiikka (translated)

Arto Koskelo wrote that Soviet propaganda depicted Israel as a stronghold of American imperialism and that Zionism was portrayed as a racist and imperialistic ideology, which was sometimes likened to fascism. He asked how this depiction differed from the tones of Yleisradio or Timo's columns. #propaganda #sionismi #imperialismi (translated)

Mikko Vuorenpää wrote that the content of Timo R. Steward's column demonstrated, in his opinion, that the title was accurate. Vuorenpää described Steward as having been dismissed from the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. https://t.co/AuGi2gxNWq #Ulkopolitiikka #Suomi #Kolumnit (translated)

Mikko Välimaa proposed that Yle allow selected writers to comment on their columnists' articles. He assessed that Timo Stewart's column contained at least five major logical fallacies and believed that they explained why the writing stirred controversy in X. Välimaa described his proposal as in the spirit of "Feasts at Aulanko." https://t.co/TxhlLYa3JX #yle #kolumni #mielipide (translated)

Matti H. Virtanen wrote that he finds it special that people labeled as racists do not need to be named, even though problems in journalism are usually identified in order to solve them. He pondered whether racism would then be seen as an abstract evil residing in everyone. Virtanen referred to Timo R. Stewart's column in Yle, which stated in its title that a racist has nothing useful to say about social issues. According to Virtanen, religions, beliefs, and cultures are not related to skin color or other racial characteristics, and comparing and evaluating them is acceptable civic discourse. He argued that "From the River to the Sea – all Women shall be Free" is not a racist appeal, even though opponents of equality might claim otherwise. #journalismi #kulttuuri #yhteiskunta (translated)

Jari Mäkäräinen criticized Timo R. Stewart's column, stating that Stewart had already decided in advance that those who disagree are stupid and racist. According to Mäkäräinen, Stewart defined racism as evaluating individuals based on their ethnic or religious background and concluded that such individuals had nothing useful to say about international politics. Mäkäräinen mentioned that the column likened the observation of group differences to climate denialism, young Earth creationism, vaccine resistance, and reptilians. He also claimed that it had asserted that the Finnish media, researchers, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had adopted their Middle Eastern stance from Hamas. Mäkäräinen argued that the claim about the absence of pure races did not refute the phenomena indicated by statistics, attitude surveys, and street views. He highlighted religion, cousin marriages, concepts of honor, fertility, and renouncement of religion, adding that the common goals of Muslims could be examined from their own polls. According to Mäkäräinen, explaining unpleasant phenomena solely with prejudices and labeling dissenters as racists was essentialism. He criticized a sense of moral superiority and argued that it led to a lack of fact-checking, distinguishing between immigrant groups, or noticing that one's own media repeated Hamas's casualty figures. He believed that placing morality above observations weakened empathy. https://t.co/dglVfEEw2o #rasismi #media #ilmasto (translated)

„Der Strandkorb steht ja für Freizeit, also für Nicht-Arbeiten. Deswegen erlaube ich mir den Rückschluss, dass Philipp Amthor vielleicht nicht weiß, was Arbeit heißt“, sagt NIUS-Kolumnist Gunnar Schupelius @GSchupelius bei NIUS Live. Dies und mehr in den Schlagzeilen des Tages. https://t.co/GcySKTADrA #Freizeit #Arbeit #Gesellschaft

Es ist immer wieder FANTASTISCH, wie Robert #Habeck mit einem einzigen reflektierten öffentlichen Auftritt zuverlässig einen zweiwöchigen Totalausfall der deutschen Populismusindustrie auslöst. Ein paar ruhige, differenzierte Sätze – und schon werfen sich Kolumnisten, Kulturkämpfer und Empörungsunternehmer im Schichtbetrieb auf jedes einzelne Wort, bis auch der Letzte bewiesen hat, warum diese Art von Öffentlichkeit inzwischen so erbärmlich berechenbar ist. #Politik #Öffentlichkeit #Populismus

Viktoria Ladõnskaja-Kubits käsitleb oma kolumni kaudu hiljutiste Venemaa riigiduuma valimiste tagajärgi, sealhulgas opositsiooni läbikukkumist, sõdurite tõusu uueks eliidiks, kommunistlike ideede naasmist ja elektrooniliste valimiste anomaaliaid. #VenemaaValimised #Opositsioon #Poliitika